ElectricLimnology
Joined: Nov 20, 2017
Posts: 111
Southeast MIchigan
|
Posted on Oct 28 2018 03:11 PM
Has anyone ever built the Surfybear with a short reverb tank? If so what tank did you use? This shouldn't be that weird of an idea given that the original Fender Reverbs had short tanks. Obviously they are tube driven rather than transformer driven etc... I understand that the character of the reverb will be different. Specifically I'm curious about empidence because I can't find a short tank that directly matches that of the recommended long tanks.
— The Vicissitones
Diesel Marine
The Rasputones
|
j_flanders
Joined: Jun 28, 2017
Posts: 162
|
Posted on Oct 28 2018 04:47 PM
The input impedance of the short tank is close enough. (10 Ohm vs 8 Ohm)
That figure is also only at 1kHz. It will drop a little at lower frequencies and rises almost exponentionally towards higher frequencies.
If the longer tank is 8 Ohm at 1000 Hz, I guess the short tank will be 8 Ohm around 800 or 900 Hz. So, it doesn't matter all that much as far as the driving circuit is concerned.
I mounted a long and a short tank (Accutronics 4AB3C1B and 8AB3C1B) in one enclosure and they're wired to a 4PDT toggle switch, so I can easily switch between the two.
The long tank is bright and drippy and is the best choice surfy tones. When people talk about spring reverb, they generally mean this tank and its typical sound and tone.
The short tank sounds very lush, darker, fuller, less metallic, a lot less drippy. It sounds more like a hall reverb. It is also a lot louder (much more output), probably because it has 3 springs and 3 transducers.
Last edited: Oct 28, 2018 16:54:09
|
ElectricLimnology
Joined: Nov 20, 2017
Posts: 111
Southeast MIchigan
|
Posted on Oct 28 2018 05:51 PM
J_flanders, thank you for the response. You answered many of my questions surrounding tank size. I have two old toolboxes that could be used to house the Surfybear. One is shorter, too short for a long tank, but looks a lot cooler than the other. This got me thinking about the short tank. In a way, the characteristics of the short tank are appealing because I like the idea of not sounding quite like everything else. But if it is significantly less drippy than the long tank I'll probably build it with the ugly tool box after all.
Now my question is, does it make sense to say that "drip" is a factor of spring length? If so why do the Fender Reverbs drip so much? Does it have to do with tube circuitry? If not, is it possible that there is a drippier sounding short tank?
— The Vicissitones
Diesel Marine
The Rasputones
Last edited: Oct 28, 2018 17:52:55
|
j_flanders
Joined: Jun 28, 2017
Posts: 162
|
Posted on Oct 28 2018 06:29 PM
I really cannot get a drippy, surfy tone out of that short 3 spring tank.
A while ago I modded my Vox Pathfinder 15R and Marshall MG15CDR. They both have a rather cheaply made, short, two spring tank inside and despite the length I could make them very drippy by adjusting the recovery circuit.
I recently also added a spring tank to a Marshall MG10CD and created the drive and recovery circuit from scratch and I was (again) surprised how much the drip depends on the drive and recovery circuit rather than the tank itself.
But there's no denying that the long tanks are easier to make them drip and their drip definitely sounds 'better' (or maybe just more familiar)
I think though that the longer the spring the harder it becomes to make it not drip, while the shorter the spring the harder it is to make it drip.
I once made an 8 meter longer spring reverb in my basement and the only sound it made was "piew... piew...", a very high pitched drip.
It looked and sounded similar to this:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-6J0hacr1WU
Last edited: Oct 28, 2018 19:06:13
|
ElectricLimnology
Joined: Nov 20, 2017
Posts: 111
Southeast MIchigan
|
Posted on Oct 28 2018 07:48 PM
That's fantastic! It's the Star Wars x-wing fighter cannon sound! Did you ever try running an audio signal though it?
Anyway, it's sounding even more like the ugly long tool box for me and the Surfybear.
And once again thanks for your tremendously helpful input.
— The Vicissitones
Diesel Marine
The Rasputones
|
edwardsand
Joined: Jun 29, 2018
Posts: 764
|
Posted on Oct 28 2018 09:24 PM
I've been working on my Surfybear/Surfy Trem project for a while now, and because I'm using the cabinet of an old radio, I have to use a short tank. It definitely gets drippy (to my ears), but I also find that it is too much reverb. Perhaps there's no such thing as too much reverb, but it really is overwhelming and I have to turn mix and dwell down quite low to the range of 2-3 to have it be a nice saturated level rather than way more reverb than guitar.
So j Flanders comment on the short tanks makes sense. My question is whether there is any way to tame this, like by changing pot values, throwing a resistor or capacitor into the circuit somewhere, or who knows what. I am building it so that I can hook up a long tank externally, so at some point I can A/B the tanks, and if I need to add some other switch in the circuit, that's not big deal.
|
Humpelhuhn_Todesstern
Joined: Aug 01, 2017
Posts: 3
|
Posted on Nov 02 2018 08:15 AM
Hello there, I have some questions.
I would like to know how much ohm the trim poti has, can somebody tell me? It seems like mine is broken unfortunately.
Could somebody tell me how I could change the mix regulation so that I can adjust it from 100% dry (and 0 wet) to 100 wet (0 dry), and so that in
mid position its 50-50?
And also: is there a schematic of the surfy verb? I couldnt find it.
|
Taifighter
Joined: Oct 31, 2018
Posts: 225
Indiana
|
Posted on Nov 02 2018 08:45 AM
I've been waiting to post this up for so long... I didn't want to join the forum until I had some more content to share. You can look at my profile to see my other posts that talk about my gear and the band that I use it in.
This pedal is brought into the chain with an effects loop pedal, and had the tank mounted under my pedal board. It's awesome.
I use a clean boost after the reverb pedal (not shown in this photo) to be able to match the volume of the pedal to the amp when the reverb is engaged. Again, these two pedals are brought into my signal by the small black effects loop pedal on my board.
|
bjoish
Joined: Jul 06, 2010
Posts: 596
Stockholm
|
Posted on Nov 02 2018 12:44 PM
Humpelhuhn_Todesstern wrote:
Hello there, I have some questions.
I would like to know how much ohm the trim poti has, can somebody tell me? It seems like mine is broken unfortunately.
Could somebody tell me how I could change the mix regulation so that I can adjust it from 100% dry (and 0 wet) to 100 wet (0 dry), and so that in
mid position its 50-50?
And also: is there a schematic of the surfy verb? I couldnt find it.
Hello Humpelhuhn_Todesstern
Normally we dont recommend adjusting the trimpot. It is factory set to the same gain as the 6G15 reverb.
If you are sure you want to replace the trimpot, please contact me and I will give you advice.
The Mixer control is the same as for the Fender 6G15 and works in a little peculiar way. It doesnt work in a fully linear way and as you increase the wet sound it replaces some of the treble of the dry signal with treble from the wet signal.
/Björn
|
mrflood
Joined: Nov 29, 2017
Posts: 14
|
Posted on Nov 02 2018 12:52 PM
Taifighter wrote:
I've been waiting to post this up for so long... I didn't want to join the forum until I had some more content to share. You can look at my profile to see my other posts that talk about my gear and the band that I use it in.
This pedal is brought into the chain with an effects loop pedal, and had the tank mounted under my pedal board. It's awesome.
I use a clean boost after the reverb pedal (not shown in this photo) to be able to match the volume of the pedal to the amp when the reverb is engaged. Again, these two pedals are brought into my signal by the small black effects loop pedal on my board.
I would be curious to see how you have it mounted under your pedalboard as I have thought of doing something similar...
|
Taifighter
Joined: Oct 31, 2018
Posts: 225
Indiana
|
Posted on Nov 02 2018 01:20 PM
I would be curious to see how you have it mounted under your pedalboard as I have thought of doing something similar...
I'll grab a pic the next time I'm with my band, I'll show you how I'm running it.
|
Taifighter
Joined: Oct 31, 2018
Posts: 225
Indiana
|
Posted on Nov 06 2018 10:58 PM
|
LaFleur
Joined: May 20, 2009
Posts: 525
Leipzig
|
Posted on Nov 07 2018 09:26 AM
Cool! I had the same idea to save some space on the pedalboard. What is the size of the housing for the Surfy Bear circuit?
— http://www.reverbnation.com/bangmustang
http://www.facebook.com/bangmustang
https://soundcloud.com/bang-mustang
|
DerJuicen
Joined: Aug 05, 2017
Posts: 17
Long Beach, Ca
|
Posted on Nov 07 2018 11:20 AM
LaFleur wrote:
Cool! I had the same idea to save some space on the pedalboard. What is the size of the housing for the Surfy Bear circuit?
Some pics of my board are at the top of page 103. I used a double wide housing from Amazon 4.7 x 3.7 x 1.2 inches. After looking again there are pre painted boxes available, I might switch mine out!
|
ankof
Joined: Dec 28, 2017
Posts: 5
|
Posted on Dec 16 2018 03:17 PM
hi. maby this have been up before but its an awfull amount of info in this thread... how much heat do the surfybear produce? is it ok to mount it on a steel plate along the back inside the cabinet? there will be a went hole covered with grill cloth the same size, 80x130mm, as the steel plate.
the steel plate is attached to the chassi/control plate... its from an old solid state bass amp. right now Im using it as is but I can change the steel plate för alloy/copper or a cpu heatsink if its necessary, and/or leave the back more open... the cabinet with control plate is about the same style and size as a fender reverb.
|
j_flanders
Joined: Jun 28, 2017
Posts: 162
|
Posted on Dec 16 2018 06:12 PM
It produces quite a lot of heat.
I mounted it inside a relatively small Hammond box, which I covered with Fender tweed fabric. No vent holes.
I didn't want to drill a hole in the enclosure and have an 'ugly' screw on the outside which normally secures the pcb heat-pad to the enclosure serving as the heatsink.
So, I made a large custom metal plate inside the box and screwed the pcb to that. The metal plate itself acts as the heatsink but the plate is also in contact with the hammond box.
But with the tweed covering and no vent holes the heat builds up inside the pedal and the heat transfer to the surrounding air outside the box is probably poor.
It has been in use on a daily basis for a couple of years without a problem.
Sometimes I forget to turn it off and it has been on for more than 24 hours straight.
Just sharing my personal experience and the 'risk' I took, not recommending it.
Edit: It looks like taifighter above did the same thing. Maybe he screwed it to the bottom of the box? Seems unlikely. I don't see a screw on the front though. Maybe it's just 'floating' inside?
Last edited: Dec 16, 2018 18:36:13
|
charlie_dont
Joined: Aug 28, 2016
Posts: 12
|
Posted on Dec 16 2018 07:14 PM
Speaking of... Can anyone recommend a material to replace the pcb heat pad? Sadly, mine got destroyed while making a repair...
|
Chippertheripper
Joined: Mar 11, 2011
Posts: 819
Semass
|
Posted on Dec 17 2018 03:18 AM
Use proper heat sink tape or compound between the fets and whatever you had dissipating their heat.
|
Gilette
Joined: May 04, 2014
Posts: 734
|
Posted on Dec 17 2018 05:02 AM
A computer repair shop usually stocks this kind of tape.
charlie_dont wrote:
Speaking of... Can anyone recommend a material to replace the pcb heat pad? Sadly, mine got destroyed while making a repair...
|
charlie_dont
Joined: Aug 28, 2016
Posts: 12
|
Posted on Dec 17 2018 05:09 AM
Thanks guys, I searched like crazy and came up empty... mostly because I wasn't sure what the stuff was called.
|