RobbieReverb
Joined: Feb 28, 2006
Posts: 2388
San Jose, Ca.
|

Posted on Sep 23 2011 08:24 PM
Not exclusively surf, but this applies to nearly all working musicians. An interesting discussion of music pirates, and illegal downloading by guitarist "Mahavishnu " John McLaughlin, on his website....
http://www.johnmclaughlin.com/news/2011/09/21/pirates/#more-612
Bob
— Bob
|
Squid
Joined: Aug 22, 2010
Posts: 1019
Portland, Oregon with Insanitizers
|

Posted on Sep 23 2011 10:59 PM
With software such as Audials ( http://audials.com/en/start/ ) being "legal" the profitability in selling recorded music has faded from the past. I have been trying to understand this matter and a longitudinal view seems most understandable. Inexpensive mass replication of intellectual works started with Gutenberg's printing press. Since then industries have developed profiting from mass replication. Now the pendulum is swinging in the other direction, as the integrity of mass replication is undermined by digital electronics. This applies to all sorts of media. Technology taketh away what technology giveth, in this case the ability to sell mass replicated content such as music.
Eventually music may appear on a more complex medium that prevents easy replication, analogous to blu-ray discs for movies. However, given that MP3s are widely accepted as listenable, this does seem unlikely.
— Insanitizers! http://www.insanitizers.com
|
JakeDobner
Joined: Feb 26, 2006
Posts: 12159
Seattle
|

Posted on Sep 23 2011 11:03 PM
Piracy didn't kill the music industry. The younger generation doesn't pirate music, they don't know how, same goes with older generations. Piracy is a select group, and it happened widespread in the day of the cassette tape. It was easier to duplicate a cassette than to rip a CD.
Who killed the music industry? Now what does one mean by industry? The big labels? Yeah, they are certainly seeing reduced profits. You know who is seeing increased profit and unprecedented exposure? Independent labels. Music still lives on everyone! Fear not. A mid-level independent band can chart in the top 20 and a top independent band can top the charts. It just isn't something that happened 10-20 years ago. Some bands are even going platinum without becoming household names.
The biggest detriment to what I consider "the music industry" is singles. We are in a singles generation. People love to download the latest songs. They will gladly pay $0.99 for them. They don't want to buy entire albums anymore. They like to create mixes instead of immerse themselves in an album. I'm a huge album guy, but you can't blame them. It takes a lot of time to get into some albums and all the songs aren't always hits. This has really damaged record sales and I can't imagine it would do anything but decrease profits.
Record stores... They got too big, too unpersonal. And the big-box stores are probably the biggest culprit. How can a record store survive selling only music you can't get at Walmart or Best Buy?
People. I have downloaded an immense amount of music in my days. Have I paid for all of it? No. Have I spent vast amounts more than I ever would because I was able to download music and discover new genres and new artists? You bet! I don't even want to think how much I've spent on music. If I couldn't have downloaded music to try it out ahead of time... I can't imagine all the stuff I'd be missing out on. I'd probably be buying one album a month at Best Buy and not having the appreciate for music that I do. I know I can't be the only one. And this shows as the aforementioned independent artists doing incredibly well. Even fledgling bands can self-release with a distribution deal. I've seen this in several instances, and top bands are abandoning their labels for independent labels are starting their own labels.
So, no, John McLaughlin. Pirates are not to blame. If anything, more people know of John McLaughlin because of the current digital music culture. And John... try adapting yourself!
How many recording studios have closed their doors forever?
This is because of the huge technological leap of the quality of home studios and portable recording gear. You don't have to step foot in a recording studio to make a top notch recording. He acknowledges this, but doesn't quite grasps how much it has changed. Bands can spend more time recording for less money and with more freedom.
I don't think many people are pirating John McLaughlin albums. I listened to him on Youtube, and I will never ever buy one of his albums. I consider his music unoriginal, unmusical, and soulless.
|
JakeDobner
Joined: Feb 26, 2006
Posts: 12159
Seattle
|

Posted on Sep 23 2011 11:06 PM
Squid wrote:
Eventually music may appear on a more complex medium
that prevents easy replication, analogous to blu-ray
discs for movies. However, given that MP3s are widely
accepted as listenable, this does seem unlikely.
MP3s can be great. What is bad... is the bit rate they are mostly ripped at and people who listen to music on their laptops. As a result... I don't think we are going to start seeing 24-bit music anytime soon, and we should be getting it...
|
RobbieReverb
Joined: Feb 28, 2006
Posts: 2388
San Jose, Ca.
|

Posted on Sep 23 2011 11:41 PM
JakeDobner wrote:
Piracy didn't kill the music industry. The younger
generation doesn't pirate music, they don't know how,
same goes with older generations. Piracy is a select
group, and it happened widespread in the day of the
cassette tape. It was easier to duplicate a cassette
than to rip a CD.
Who killed the music industry? Now what does one mean
by industry? The big labels? Yeah, they are certainly
seeing reduced profits. You know who is seeing
increased profit and unprecedented exposure?
Independent labels. Music still lives on everyone! Fear
not. A mid-level independent band can chart in the top
20 and a top independent band can top the charts. It
just isn't something that happened 10-20 years ago.
Some bands are even going platinum without becoming
household names.
The biggest detriment to what I consider "the music
industry" is singles. We are in a singles generation.
People love to download the latest songs. They will
gladly pay $0.99 for them. They don't want to buy
entire albums anymore. They like to create mixes
instead of immerse themselves in an album. I'm a huge
album guy, but you can't blame them. It takes a lot of
time to get into some albums and all the songs aren't
always hits. This has really damaged record sales and I
can't imagine it would do anything but decrease
profits.
Record stores... They got too big, too unpersonal. And
the big-box stores are probably the biggest culprit.
How can a record store survive selling only music you
can't get at Walmart or Best Buy?
People. I have downloaded an immense amount of music in
my days. Have I paid for all of it? No. Have I spent
vast amounts more than I ever would because I was able
to download music and discover new genres and new
artists? You bet! I don't even want to think how much
I've spent on music. If I couldn't have downloaded
music to try it out ahead of time... I can't imagine
all the stuff I'd be missing out on. I'd probably be
buying one album a month at Best Buy and not having the
appreciate for music that I do. I know I can't be the
only one. And this shows as the aforementioned
independent artists doing incredibly well. Even
fledgling bands can self-release with a distribution
deal. I've seen this in several instances, and top
bands are abandoning their labels for independent
labels are starting their own labels.
So, no, John McLaughlin. Pirates are not to blame. If
anything, more people know of John McLaughlin because
of the current digital music culture. And John... try
adapting yourself!
How many recording studios have closed their doors
forever?
This is because of the huge technological leap of the
quality of home studios and portable recording gear.
You don't have to step foot in a recording studio to
make a top notch recording. He acknowledges this, but
doesn't quite grasps how much it has changed. Bands can
spend more time recording for less money and with more
freedom.
I don't think many people are pirating John McLaughlin
albums. I listened to him on Youtube, and I will never
ever buy one of his albums. I consider his music
unoriginal, unmusical, and soulless.
Jake, I agree with just about everything that you're saying here about the piracy, and the record business.
But I don't agree with "his unoriginality, unmusicality and soullessness"" as far as his overall career goes. I haven't heard his recent stuff, so I can't comment on that. But his stuff with Miles Davie, Tony Williams, Mahavishnu Orchestra, and Shakti was groundbreaking at the time (late 60's through late 70's). Some of this other stuff, while maybe not ground-breaking (the Trio with Paco De Lucia & Al DiMeola) was very good.
Bob
— Bob
|
JakeDobner
Joined: Feb 26, 2006
Posts: 12159
Seattle
|

Posted on Sep 23 2011 11:52 PM
I was unfair to say that, I was just watching some recent videos at the Crossroads music festival. He was just another Clapton/SRV wannabe in those videos.
|
RobbieReverb
Joined: Feb 28, 2006
Posts: 2388
San Jose, Ca.
|

Posted on Sep 24 2011 12:14 AM
JakeDobner wrote:
I was unfair to say that, I was just watching some
recent videos at the Crossroads music festival. He was
just another Clapton/SRV wannabe in those videos.
McLaughlin's stuff has historically varied A LOT. I don't always like it, but most of the time I respect him because he's not standing still. I, too, was unimpressed with his Crossroads videos.
— Bob
|
elreydlp
Joined: Sep 04, 2009
Posts: 1800
Temecula, CA
|

Posted on Sep 24 2011 12:38 AM
I think Seal Team Six should be dispatched to put the same hurt on music pirates that they put on the Somali Pirates!
|
crumble
Joined: Sep 09, 2008
Posts: 3158
Guildford England
|

Posted on Sep 24 2011 05:19 AM
Hey Jake, try: "Love Devotion Surrender" (1973) athough it might sound crap these days, i used to listen to it a lot.
Piracy: It's sad when you search Google for a band only to be directed to a free mp3 blog (ie: the blog appears at the top of page). They should do something about that, free stuff souldn't be easier to get than pay stuff.
|
djangodeadman
Joined: Jan 25, 2007
Posts: 1568
Brighton UK
|

Posted on Sep 24 2011 06:16 AM
JakeDobner wrote:
Squid wrote:
Eventually music may appear on a more complex medium
that prevents easy replication, analogous to blu-ray
discs for movies. However, given that MP3s are
widely
accepted as listenable, this does seem unlikely.
MP3s can be great. What is bad... is the bit rate they
are mostly ripped at and people who listen to music on
their laptops. As a result... I don't think we are
going to start seeing 24-bit music anytime soon, and we
should be getting it...
24-bit serves no purpose as a delivery medium. It's advatages are to be found in recording, where it allows considerably more headroom (48dBs more) than 16-bit. That headroom is all removed in the mastering proces anyway, so 16-bit is absolutely fine for listening. 24-bit files just take up a lot more hard disk space.
— Los Fantasticos
|
crumble
Joined: Sep 09, 2008
Posts: 3158
Guildford England
|

Posted on Sep 24 2011 06:32 AM
Is CD 16bit though? I've heard it's more like 14bit with 2bits used for other duties.
|
Las_Barracudas
Joined: Apr 24, 2011
Posts: 1087
Surf City, NC
|

Posted on Sep 24 2011 07:51 AM
That genie is out of the bottle imo. You can piss & moan about it all you want but truthfully we have very little control of media once is put out there (cyber space).
The good thing is (as Jake stated) technology has leveled the playing field quite a bit .
The dynamic has changed, the fault has shifted, people need to accept and adjust to it??
— METEOR IV on reverbnation
|
djangodeadman
Joined: Jan 25, 2007
Posts: 1568
Brighton UK
|

Posted on Sep 24 2011 08:03 AM
crumble wrote:
Is CD 16bit though? I've heard it's more like 14bit
with 2bits used for other duties.
My point still stands.
— Los Fantasticos
|
Fady
Joined: Mar 07, 2010
Posts: 2272
North Carolina
|

Posted on Sep 24 2011 08:11 AM
Very well articulated perspective, Jake. I think you speak a lot of truth & reality on this topic.
I'd also push back on McLaughlin's point about where to police. Suggesting service providers/telcos own more enforcement responsibility is equivalent to saying the DOT (department of transportation) should be more accountable for road rage or that Mead (the pencil people) should be more accountable for errors in spelling and grammar.
— Fady
El Mirage @ ReverbNation
|
Ruhar
Joined: Jun 21, 2007
Posts: 3909
San Diego, CA
|

Posted on Sep 24 2011 10:51 AM
JakeDobner wrote:
I consider his music
highly original, extremely musical, and incredibly soulful.
Fixed.
— Ryan
The Secret Samurai Website
The Secret Samurai on Facebook
|
dboomer
Joined: Jan 05, 2009
Posts: 262
Port Hueneme, CA
|

Posted on Sep 24 2011 11:49 AM
crumble wrote:
Is CD 16bit though? I've heard it's more like 14bit
with 2bits used for other duties.
Yes it is 16 bit and whether or not the full bit rate is utilized is a function of drive levels and headroom (during mastering)
|
Ariel
Joined: Aug 29, 2009
Posts: 1556
Israel
|

Posted on Sep 24 2011 12:33 PM
djangodeadman wrote:
My point still stands.
Indeed it does. Completely true.
The problem with modern mastering is not the number of bits, it's good taste, i.e. pushing stuff to or over the limits of digital headroom, insensible EQing etc.
Similarly, the problem with modern delivery is not the number of bits, its... good taste, i.e. ripping the stuff to 128kbs mp3's, bad auto-normalizing alogarithms, bad converters etc...
Last edited: Sep 24, 2011 12:42:14
|
aqualadius
Joined: Aug 30, 2010
Posts: 415
Charlotte, NC
|

Posted on Sep 24 2011 02:03 PM
I think that the direction music access is going is just wonderful. Thanki God that piracy exists! Because the only thing you can never pirate is actually being there. And if that means people return to the live gigs en masses maybe the majors would ditch this prepackaged electronic crap for real live onstage musicianship.
— Jeremy
|
Las_Barracudas
Joined: Apr 24, 2011
Posts: 1087
Surf City, NC
|

Posted on Sep 24 2011 02:05 PM
aqualadius wrote:
I think that the direction music access is going is
just wonderful. Thanki God that piracy exists! Because
the only thing you can never pirate is actually being
there. And if that means people return to the live gigs
en masses maybe the majors would ditch this prepackaged
electronic crap for real live onstage musicianship.
I concur!
— METEOR IV on reverbnation
|
Double-Crown-Records
Joined: Feb 27, 2006
Posts: 1225
|

Posted on Sep 24 2011 04:52 PM
There's going to be a point though where labels no longer want to release new music due to piracy. With Double Crown, we've been able to stay afloat mainly with our mail order/web catalog, selling CD's from other labels and bands throughout the world. Our recent releases though have not sold well at all. Our new Threesome CD has been out a week and it's sold about 8 copies. Before that, our Surfites 7" has sold about 30 copies and our TomorrowMen CD has sold about 60 copies. These aren't sales figures that are gonna keep a label afloat. Compare this to our earlier releases - our first two 7"s by The Penetrators and the Boss Martians each sold 1,200 copies, the Penetrators Locked & Loaded CD about 2,500 copies, our Trashmen tribute CD about 2,000 (+500 LP's by Kamikaze Records) and the Surfites and Madeira debut CD's each sold about 1400-1600 each. Digital sales have helped, but it's been slowly growing and hasn't come close to matching physical CD sales.
Generally, I think the more popular indie labels are doing okay, but the way things are going, I think things are going to continue to slide over the next few years. Majors are hanging on with tour tie-in deals, and huge, deluxe box set reissues. Indies were doing okay with CD's, but those sales have tapered off and I think the LP/vinyl mini-boom of the last few years is starting to fade. Maybe they're doing okay with digital sales, maybe not.
Thankfully, Double Crown is not my main source of income - it really doesn't even bring in enough to pay for a couple weeks worth of groceries each month. My goal with the label has always been to make enough from each release to pay for the manufacturing of the next release. I do have a few more CD projects left in the release schedule, but after that I'm going to have to give some serious thought to whether I can afford to keep releasing CDs any more.
It really irritates me to find pirate blog sites uploading our music for free download, and then later discovering that hundreds, and sometimes thousands of people, are downloading each of our releases. The people running the blogs say it's free promotion, and say that most people that download music end up buying the CD if they like it. Well, either thousands of people think our music sucks after listening to it for free, or what these bloggers are saying is BS. What sucks further is these bloggers don't ask permission - I would happily allow them to distribute a song or two for free in exchange for a write up and a link to the Double Crown website (or Amazon if they want to collect a referrer's fee). But they never do.
So yes, thank God that piracy exists!
As a music fan, I have to admit that I've downloaded music for free too, but I pretty much stick to out-of-print LP's, live recordings, radio appearances, etc. Most of the music I buy now is digital, through iTunes/Amazon/eMusic, although I do get sucked in by physical box set/CD reissues on a pretty regular basis. I'm also lucky to receive tons of music for review in the Continental Magazine, which allows me to keep my surf music collection up to date. If it was just a matter of everyone buying digitally, instead of CD's and LP's, everything would be fine. But I can guarantee that that's not happening.
Hate to sound like the grumpy old man on a pedestal, yelling at all the young uns about this issue, but unless you've worked in the music industry, you just have no idea how much piracy is going to affect the music world over the next 10-20 years. There will be a point where artists will no longer record new music, because all of the costs that go along with recording will never be recovered through sales. What you'll end up with is music the way it was 100 or more years ago - local musicians that can get a bit of income through playing live.
You could start a whole new thread on the state of rock music, and where it will be in the next 20 years or so. There are fewer and fewer bands with guitars that are touring and releasing albums. It'd be great if guitar bands came back, like they did in the early 80's, but who knows if that'll actually happen.
— Sean
Double Crown Records
www.doublecrownrecords.com
Surf CD's / Vinyl / Fanzines / DVD's
Aloha Screwdriver - Lunar Wobble CD
The Nebulas - Euphorion LP / CD
Supertubos - The Fourth Drive CD
Continental Magazine - Issue #38 w/17 Song CD
|