Photo of the Day
Shoutbox

dp: dude
346 days ago

Bango_Rilla: Shout Bananas!!
301 days ago

BillyBlastOff: See you kiddies at the Convention!
285 days ago

GDW: showman
236 days ago

Emilien03: https://losg...
158 days ago

Pyronauts: Happy Tanks-Kicking!!!
151 days ago

glennmagi: CLAM SHACK guitar
137 days ago

Hothorseraddish: surf music is amazing
117 days ago

dp: get reverberated!
67 days ago

Clint: “A Day at the Beach” podcast #237 is TWO HOURS of NEW surf music releases. https://link...
16 hours ago

Please login or register to shout.

IRC Status
  • racc

Join them in the #ShallowEnd!

Need help getting started?

Current Polls

No polls at this time. Check out our past polls.

Current Contests

No contests at this time. Check out our past contests.

Donations

Help us meet our monthly goal:

35%

35%

Donate Now

Cake April Birthdays Cake
SG101 Banner

SurfGuitar101 Forums » Gear »

Permalink Great News! Revisit brand reverb tanks

New Topic
Page 1 of 1

Happy New Year Reverb brothers and sisters!

I purposefully stay out of most gear talk around here, but this discovery is too good to refrain from sharing... You have got to check out Revisit brand reverb tanks!

http://amprepairparts.com/reverb.htm

There have been a scant few references to them here that I've found anyhow, which is a misfortune worth fixing (exhibits a, b, c were all I found.)

Like many of you, I've been through my share of tanks once the original one started acting up in my G-Spring. I know many enjoy the hunt of vintage pans and whatnot. For the sake of reliably being able to get another, I've chosen to limit my hunt to current production.

In my experience the Korean made Accutronics pans can be a little on the bright/thin(er) side, the Belton branded version (presumably same factory) slightly more so. MOD, a little too cavernous and, in my specific setup, tough to get the 'just right' brightness and drip (favors warm/dark side). TAD and Mojotone much in the MOD camp (presumably made in the same factory as MOD).

The Revisit pan is presumably made in the same factory/factories as MOD too (not confirmed, just speculating from personal pan inspections), however, they aren't like the MOD etc - not too cavernous, aren't too dark. They are just right in all the right ways. Goldilocks!

I've tried 3 models from Revist... the commonly used 4AB3C1B (despite it technically being the wrong orientation to mount on the front baffle of a stand alone reverb unit), the 4AB3C1C (technically correct orientation), and for kicks, I also tried the 4AB3A1B which is a replacement for the Gibbs Type F reverb tanks.

The 4AB3C1B works the best in my specific application. It sounds really, really close to the 4AB3C1C, which I actually liked slightly better, however on select frequencies I got a faint but noticeable bit of fizz/sizzle on the decay of the C1C.

IMPORTANT NOTE: Like tubes and pretty much everything guitar/effects/amps, every application and setup/context is different. Your experience ~will~ be slightly (or a lot) different than mine. And if I had multiple reverb units to swap with everything else held constant, I am sure each would behave differently again.

Aside from the fizz issue on the C1C, BOTH the C1B and C1C sound fantastic in all the right ways - instrument and signal tone/spacial sound and feel, overtones/reverb harmonics, reverb depth/warmth/lushness. You name it, they were pretty great!

!Attention rhythm guitar surfers out there! ...the A1B "Gibbs F type" was very nice too. Slightly shorter tail, ~ever so slightly~ less 'reverbness' overall. Otherwise it had the same quality sonic/musical characteristics mentioned above. Now it isn't my first recommendation for rhythm guitarists if your primary objective is spending all of your time playing Pyramids style Penetration 'tick-a,tick-a' parts (I'd still recommend C1B or C1C for that), but for anyone mostly complimenting a drenched lead or even a lead player who likes it ever so slightly tamed, the Gibbs F type replacement 4AB3A1B is a real interesting tank to try!

Also, for the super geeky surf nerds out there who have bookmarked this thread, Studio Sound lists input impedance, output impedance and delay time (sec.) for each model!

But wait, there's more!!!

Besides being what I believe to be thee best sounding current production tank/pan available, these things have a 3 year warranty and the service from Studio Sound Electronics is A grade Numero Uno! I got speedy shipping and incredibly responsive and super helpful support swapping out the pans that didn't work as well for me, in my setup.

Again, I cannot stress enough that the fizz/sizzle issue I had was almost certainly environmental & my specific setup and application, which even if you have the exact same guitar, cables, reverb unit, and amp, there will still be differences in behavior and sound (there is no such thing as exactly the same!). In other words, don't take my situation as tank/pan product quality of Revisit pans - these things are very good quality and very consistent.

So, be it your Surfy Bear project, a need to replace a pan on the fritz, or just that omnipresent reverb fix, I highly recommend trying out Revisit pans from Studio Sound Electronics. They do cost a little more, but given the distinctly better sonic quality, consistency, and incredible customer service & support, it is totally worth it! Oh, and buy 2, get free shipping (orders over $50 shipping to the US)!

Surfs up and current production reverb pans are alive and well! \m/ \m/

PS - throw tomatoes and boooo if you want... I won't be posting video/sound clips. I no longer have the variety of pans to swap and compare - I've just got a few Revisit 4AB3C1B's on hand, so just hearing that one model compared to no others won't do much good. Besides, I can't stress enough how different each setup (and player!) is. Just try for YOURself in YOUR setup. Peace.

Fady

El Mirage @ ReverbNation

Last edited: Jan 03, 2018 10:53:56

Interesting!
Do they mention why their pans are better/closer to originals?

"You can't tell where you're going if you don't know where you've been"

It seems they've given some select (different?) specifications to the manufacturer from others.

Frank @ Sound Stage Electronics said:
"The specs we provided to the manufacturer were based on reverse-engineering the original Accutronics tanks from the late 1960s / early 1970s, trying to recapture the sound..."

Fady

El Mirage @ ReverbNation

Last edited: Jan 03, 2018 12:25:08

Excellent heads up! I'm going to order one for my Dual Reverb Quilty Bear. I've got two mods in there now. Definitely built it to offer two pan styles and I hated the accutronics that I first put in there.

The Kahuna Kings

https://www.facebook.com/pages/The-Kahuna-Kings/459752090818447

https://thekahunakings.bandcamp.com/releases

Thanks for the heads-up re the Revisit branded pans. I just assumed they were just re-badged MOD pans but that appears not to be the case. I recently tried a MOD pan in my outboard unit but found that it just didn't get that "wet drip" and put the stock MIK Accutronics back in. Sounds like the Revisit pans sit right in between the Accutronics and MOD pans...

Very interesting Fady, thanks for the detailed info.
You mentioned you assumed MOD and TAD pans might be the same - I don't think that is the case, as I have several of both, and they are very different.
However, examining the Revisit pans in the pics, they look extremely similar to the TAD pans.
Not that it proves one thing or the other. As you wisely suggested, it's best to experiment.

Best regards and happy new year

Ran

The Scimitars

As I have indicated previously and a few others have agreed, it appears that in general, MOD pans with their deeper more caveness reverb tones and long decays generally work better with on board reverb in combo amps. The Accutronics pans, which are drippier with more high end and shorter decays work better in outboard units. It is possible that the Revisit pans could work equally well in either. As much as I am now curious re the Revisit pans, I think I will stick with the MIK Accutronics in my outboard unit. I found that by mixing the outboard unit with the onboard 'verb in my amp, I can get pretty much the gamut of reverb tones.

Last edited: Jan 03, 2018 21:36:26

I've been touting Revisit pans for awhile now - I'm glad to see them finally get some other recognition here. I've got one in my Surfy Bear outboard and it's superior to the MIK Accutronics and the MOD tank, IMO (and I've had those in there in there as well).

I finally ordered one for the Dual Reverb Quilty Bear. I designed the thing to offer two different reverbs so now it sounds like I will have that. Looking forward to installing it.

The Kahuna Kings

https://www.facebook.com/pages/The-Kahuna-Kings/459752090818447

https://thekahunakings.bandcamp.com/releases

mike_fried wrote:

I've been touting Revisit pans for awhile now - I'm glad to see them finally get some other recognition here. I've got one in my Surfy Bear outboard and it's superior to the MIK Accutronics and the MOD tank, IMO (and I've had those in there in there as well).

Which one did you use in your Surfy Bear tank?

All opinions expressed by this poster are well thought out and based on actual experience and/or scientific experimentation, except for those which are knee-jerk reactions or good sounding fantasies.

I just want to add my experience:

After a first test, I can definitely say it's a great pan compared to the MOD. Where the MOD sounds washed out and less drippy, the Revisit sound drippy and a little more aggressive while keeping a refined and articulate sound (including a more defined attack). I'd say it sound a lot more like 1st wave recordings than the MOD.

I built a SurfyBear (in DIY mini-cab) and was recommended the MOD 4AB3C1B (horizontal mount) by SanchoPansen who did the pedal shootout in this section. I was happy+ with the SB, but the MOD seemed somewhat undefined. Motivated by this threat, I ordered two Revisit 4AB3C1B (planning to do a SB pedal some day).

I have yet to play around with it more, but although this cost me around 60 € per pan (price + overseas shipping + customs) and I had to waut for several weeks, those pans are already worth every penny to me.

I cannot compare to Accutronic or TAD characteristics, though, because I did not want to sink more money into experimenting. I also looked out for old Gibbs/Hammond pans, but they would amount nearly the same IF some ships internationally at all (close to zero chance to find one within the EU), and I'm not enough expert to judge if they are the right type and in good condition. So this was a much safer bet for me having read the recommendations here.

Last edited: Apr 06, 2018 09:09:06

-

Last edited: Feb 02, 2024 13:28:54

I concur with Novamax. My Revisit pan is incredible. The tone and articulation is spot on. Really blows away the MOD.

The Kahuna Kings

https://www.facebook.com/pages/The-Kahuna-Kings/459752090818447

https://thekahunakings.bandcamp.com/releases

Thanks to everyone for the heads up on these. I had some money left on a gift card and decided to try one even though I wasn't really unhappy with my accutronics.
I was really surprised by the difference. Great tone and clarity.
Definitely an improvement over the accutronics and especially the mod pan.

So, if I were to replace the stock reverb pan in my Princeton Reverb Re-issue with a pan from Revisit should I expect a noticeable improvement? I have to say that the onboard reverb of my PRRI is better than no reverb at all but not by much. I've been wondering if I have a bad pan, or a tube related issue. I generally use pedals for reverb but it would be nice to have usable reverb from the amp for those situations where I don't want to use pedals.

I can't guarantee it will improve your Princeton reverb, but it will make you 3 inches taller and prevent hair loss!
I would expect a Princeton reverb to have a pretty good on board. It's worth a try.

Thanks all for the posts. Think I'll give Revisit reverb pan a try. I had 2010 MIK Accutronics pan bust a spring a year ago in my G Spring tank and tried several (new MIK Accutronics, MOD, old Gibbs). I found similar results you did. I'm using MOD now.

I just tried their website and shopping cart has error on smartphone, tablet, and PC. So will try later.

Thanks!

Robert

The GnarlyMen

Pablomago wrote:

mike_fried wrote:

I've been touting Revisit pans for awhile now - I'm glad to see them finally get some other recognition here. I've got one in my Surfy Bear outboard and it's superior to the MIK Accutronics and the MOD tank, IMO (and I've had those in there in there as well).

Which one did you use in your Surfy Bear tank?

I used the "C" version (upright mounting) of the Revisit; no competition, in my mind.

Page 1 of 1
Top