Now that the local music shop closed down I should have money to spare soon, so I think I'll be getting one of these bridges.

I really hope it will make the Jazzmasters a little more resonant. My '66 is quite resonant as it is. haven't decided if I'll use it on the '66 or '73. '73 has a '64 bridge on it and the '66 has a MIJ bridge on it(works better than the AV I had).

Pyronauts
I've had a mastery on one of my Jazzmasters for over 6 months, and I dig it! Extremely well built with super nice metal, hand machined, awesome quality! Yes, it is expensive, but highly reliable!

Paul, what tonal/feel differences did you notice once you started using the MB?

Ryan
The Secret Samurai Website
The Secret Samurai on Facebook

I'd like to chime in with a few points about the Mastery Bridge. Yes, I had a prototype that had a built in roller bar. The final design without the roller is the superior version. It caused tuning issues, as does the BuzzStop. The added contact point causes the strings tuning to be flat, or sharp, depending on which side of the "zero" point you let go of the trem bar. I never realized how much I subconsciously flicked the trem bar to keep myself in tune when I had a BuzzStop on until I removed it. Still, without a Mastery Bridge, I would still use a BuzzStop.

Regarding tightness/looseness of posts fit with a Mastery Bridge. The posts should be loose, kind of wobbly when you place it in the cups. Then, tighten them with the Allen wrench opening on the top side of the bridge plate. That locks the bridge into the guitar.

The sound of my guitars using these Mastery Bridges is really a great improvement. Somebody recently shot a video of Slacktone at the Purple Orchid doing Miserlou, and, for me, the difference can really be heard when I play the high"E" string melody. Even with all the reverb, it's just more solid, hard hitting sound. I think that before it was more of a struggle to make that sound good. Even compared to when i used a BuzzStop.

The bridge intonates for me perfectly with both flatwounds and roundwounds. Wound, or plain "G" strings. I was skeptical until it worked for me.

This bridge, combined with Nut Sauce on the saddles and nut, is just very successful for me.

And No More Rust! I have replaced bridges due the rust ruining my old bridges.

If you like exotic tunings, you have A Lot of adjustment room for intonation. Even standard tuning on a stock bridge, low "E" string intonation can be tough. The saddle won't really always go back far enough. On my stock bridges I've cut the springs, and ground down the ends of the intonation screws to get them to work better. No more of that for me.

Hope this helps answer a few questions.

~ dave

SlacktoneDave
The sound of my guitars using these Mastery Bridges is really a great improvement. Somebody recently shot a video of Slacktone at the Purple Orchid doing Miserlou, and, for me, the difference can really be heard when I play the high"E" string melody. Even with all the reverb, it's just more solid, hard hitting sound. I think that before it was more of a struggle to make that sound good. Even compared to when i used a BuzzStop.

That is good to hear. Personally, I've always had to struggle and fight with the bridge to have the high 'e' saddle and string make really solid contact with the rest of the bridge. Kind of resulting in a duller tone.

I guess not. My Jazzmaster bridges don't rock, I was setting them up today, and I had a look at that aspect of them. I think one of them is taped, not sure about the other. It's been ages since I've had the bridges off.

Just put new strings on mine, and all is well. I was able to intonate it perfectly, no problem, and it's staying in tune just fine.

I wouldn't say Fenders have deep tone. I've always thought they are a little on the thin side, which is really part of the appeal. And Jag/Jazz don't really have much sustain, which is something that the mastery improves by having more contact.

Also, I feel too much stock is placed on strings slipping over the tremolo. If you watch your strings, you really can't tell if they are even moving at all, even on a guitar with a fixed tune-o-matic/abr-1 bridge.

And on the Mastery, there really isn't anything for the string to catch on. It is just going to roll over and return, no burs to catch on.

JakeDobner
I wouldn't say Fenders have deep tone. I've always thought they are a little on the thin side, which is really part of the appeal. And Jag/Jazz don't really have much sustain, which is something that the mastery improves by having more contact.

Also, I feel too much stock is placed on strings slipping over the tremolo. If you watch your strings, you really can't tell if they are even moving at all, even on a guitar with a fixed tune-o-matic/abr-1 bridge.

And on the Mastery, there really isn't anything for the string to catch on. It is just going to roll over and return, no burs to catch on.

Jake, my band moan like hell if bring my strat to practice, they've never heard any like the Jazzmaster, they've become mesmerized by it. I even had to check and make sure i hadn't brought a baritone version by mistake!

crumb
Jake, my band moan like hell if bring my strat to practice, they've never heard any like the Jazzmaster, they've become mesmerized by it. I even had to check and make sure i hadn't brought a baritone version by mistake!

Then they'd shit bricks if you brought a Guild, Gretsch, Supro, or even certain Gibson to practice. Those can be deep guitars.

Crumb, I'm far from being right...just offering an opinion like everyone else.

I think most of the 60's surf music that was recorded with Jags and JM's had stock rocking bridges.

Site dude - S3 Agent #202
Need help with the site? SG101 FAQ - Send me a private message - Email me

"It starts... when it begins" -- Ralf Kilauea