Photo of the Day
Shoutbox

SHADOWNIGHT5150: Bank accounts are a scam created by a shadow government
274 days ago

sysmalakian: TODAY IS MY BIRTHDAY!
260 days ago

dp: dude
241 days ago

Bango_Rilla: Shout Bananas!!
196 days ago

BillyBlastOff: See you kiddies at the Convention!
180 days ago

GDW: showman
131 days ago

Emilien03: https://losg...
53 days ago

Pyronauts: Happy Tanks-Kicking!!!
46 days ago

glennmagi: CLAM SHACK guitar
32 days ago

Hothorseraddish: surf music is amazing
12 days ago

Please login or register to shout.

Current Polls

No polls at this time. Check out our past polls.

Current Contests

No contests at this time. Check out our past contests.

Donations

Help us meet our monthly goal:

64%

64%

Donate Now

Cake January Birthdays Cake
SG101 Banner

SurfGuitar101 Forums » Gear »

Permalink Fender Tonemaster is now a stompbox. No brownface again,

New Topic
Goto Page: Previous 1 2 3

synchro wrote:

CaptainSensible wrote:

I’m not against modeling. Have had a ton of them, and currently just use three UA amp pedals (Dream, Ruby, and Woodrow) through stereo monitors as my home setup. But I’ve just never been a fan of multi-effects setups for stomp boxes. The modeling may be quite good, but I still just prefer individual boxes with knobs I can see and turn easily. Plus for the stuff I play 95% of the time, I just don’t need access to a ton of different effects. Reverb, tremolo, two delays, and a little grit and I’m good to go.

One thing Fender did which appears to be interesting, is to set this up like a pedalboard with separate controls for each effect, although the switches also can be rotated like a knob, and have dynamic labels. I haven’t seen one in person, so I withhold judgment for or against. I wasn’t entirely clear on whether it meant to be used as a pedalboard, and operated by foot.

The vast majority of the time, I play through a board with a delay, a reverb + tremolo and a Surfy Industries Blossom Point. This is all I use, pretty much all of the time.
image

For gigs, I use a somewhat more complicated board, but mostly because I want to make all of my options foot-switchable, so I don’t have to fiddle with settings, during a gig. This uses a Stanley Blue Nebula, which I use as a setlist manager and use the presets within (mostly plate reverb and delays) for many songs, but the Source Audio Vertigo gives me tremolo which I can control with a tap tempo switch, separate from the reverb. The True Spring is my Surf reverb (used with a preamp-only patch on the Blue Nebula) and the blue and white pedal is setup for hall-reverb and a light slap-back, for sort of a Chet Atkins sound. There’s also a Nobels ODR-1 Drivd pedal which I use only to take the edge off, if I feel that the sound may be too harsh. I can actually get most of the same sounds out of the small board, but it requires changing settings, which I don’t care to do during a gig.

So I agree, I don’t use a lot of effects, but I can see there being an advantage to having a Phase Shifter, a Flanger, or a Chorus on tap, without losing any pedalboard real estate. These are things I use very rarely, but for one song per set, they might come in handy.

image

The artist formerly known as: Synchro

When Surf Guitar is outlawed only outlaws will play Surf Guitar.

Tqi wrote:

synchro wrote:

I just watched Ryan’s demo of this on 60 Cycle Hum. He had it goi g directly into an audio recorder. I was pleasantly surprised by some of the amp models. The Fender Blackface models were quite good, along with the ‘59 Bassman model.

Sounds great in his hands to be sure. Though, I'm pretty sure a Mooer Skyverb into an MG10CD would sound like surf heaven in his hands. The man made a Jag-Stang into a surf guitar for crying out loud.

I did see the same touch screen issues others have reported while watching him, so there's definitely some work for Fender to do on bugfixing even after the launch day patch suite. I wonder if you need to have a lab coat and pocket protector to manage the firmware process? Or, if you need to have specific computer gear? - reads - no actually, it switches into a target disk mode and you drag and drop over USB mass storage. So, in theory you should be able to do that from most (Android) phones. Pretty good.

Ryan’s JagStang amazes me. It makes me want a JagStang. He’s a good player, and I’m a firm believer that sound is greatly controlled by technique. You seldom hear discussions of pick attack, but it has a major effect on sound. Likewise, good LH technique that allows each note to ring out and develop a full, “round”, sound. But I think that a well-played JagStang with enough brightness at the amp should sound decent for Surf.

Touchscreens always concern me. I’ve used iPads since they came out, and have noticed that after some matter of years, the touchscreens don’t always behave as they should. I’d had to see this product be a life-limited device which is not economically repairable after 5 years or so.

Tqi wrote:

If in a few updates it has a fixed interface and a comprehensive Fender amp list with 4-5 Tweed; 4-5 Brownface; 4-5 Silverface; a couple of the interesting 80's amps; some of the less readily (and cheaply) available modern amps like the Pawn Shop set, SuperSonic, and more 90's treasures like the DeVille and the Hot Rods; and a suite of bass stuff like the Bassman 100T, Super Bassman and some matching pedals - then it might be worth the price tag.

I agree, the list of amp models seemed pretty predictable, when it came to the Fender amps. I would love to have seen a ‘62 Dual Showman, a ‘57 Twin (plus other Tweed amps), the Chris Stapleton ‘62 Princeton, and a few more, but I’m hardly their target market, and it may be that there is only room for so many models. If that’s the case, perhaps some future software release would allow the user to choose from a list of models. I’d never use the EVH amp, but I’d use the three I mentioned, all the time.

Tqi wrote:

Synchro wrote:

There were numerous effects pedal models. Ryan, being who he is, came up with some interesting Surf patches, which sounded pretty good. I would have loved to hear a drippy reverb in front of the ‘59 Bassman model. Something tells me that would sound great.

I do like a Surfy Bear into a '59 Bassman on my VT100, so that sounds pretty nice to me.

The ‘59 Bassman is about as good as it gets. I’ve heard several examples of a ‘59 Bassman for Surf, and they always sound great. From what I understand, the ‘57 Twin shares a lot in common with the Bassman, and looks to be a lot easier to carry. If the Bird of Great Riches ever decides to lay a huge money-egg in my back yard, maybe I’ll buy a ‘57 Twin RI and have a custom tweed piggyback cabinet built for it. Smile Wouldn’t that be absolutely cool; a Tweed Twin head bridged across two fairly large 1x12” tweed, closed-back speaker cabs?

Tqi wrote:

Synchro wrote:

Ryan’s review isn’t about to make me bust out my Visa, which just recovered from my recent vacation, but I see that this product might make sense to some buyers. While $1,700 seems a lot of money, one might be able to use this as an all in one, and not use a pedalboard. My main pedalboard would cost more than $1,700 to duplicate, so the price makes at least some sense.

That's fair, though I don't know how true it is for every guitarist, especially in surf. Even being generous and going high end, a Surfy Bear, Surfy Trem, Surfy Fuzz and a real Carbon Copy is still only $1000 in total, you could shave $100 off that immediately if you prefer Metal or Compact instead of Classic - and there's a lot of room in good Tremolo and Fuzz under the (to be clear, fully justified) Surfy pricepoints. Even before significant shopping around, that leaves you just about enough cash for: a ToneMaster deluxe reverb, a real deluxe reverb, a Milkman The Amp, or quite a lot else. Especially if you need the FRFR for the Tonemaster in your rig.

I did a quick mental cost analysis of my gig board, and including the board itself, the Cioks power supply/distribution, the pedals and the cables, you’re looking at nearly $2,000 to recreate at today’s prices.

That little Temple Audio Duo 17, plus the Cioks power supplies comes to a cool $477, before adding even one pedal. I’m a massive cheapskate Smile but not when it comes to gear. The two Source Audio pedals, plus tap-tempo switches adds about $500 more, and the always-on Blossom Point adds another $200. Figure $119 for the ODR-1, $329 for the Blue Nebula (at today’s £ to $ exchange rate), and $199 for the Dispatch Master and you’re at $1,824, not to mention the foot switch for the tremolo built in to one of my amps, seven George L’s cables, and a patch panel on the side of the board and we’re pushing $2,000. Well, I drive a 13 year old pickup truck, and not a BMW, so I can afford such frivolities in a pedalboard. :j

Tqi wrote:

I don't know that I have any more comment to make on this thing, and I'm not going to get my hands on it anytime soon, so - time for me to stop armchair commentating and go pay for my coil winding machine. As usual, I wish Fender luck and hope it works out for the people who buy this lovely digital recreation of a 63 reverb. Dead Reverb

I’m not rushing to buy one. Perhaps I’ll stop by the local GC during a weekday and try one out, one of these days. I see a place for it, but probably not in my stable of gear.

What I’ve found, in my case, is that with all of the choices available to me, I tend to use pretty much the same handful of options, all the time. I play my Squier Jaguar much of the time, or one of my Gretsch guitars, or a MIM Thinline Tele. I can get great sounds out of any of them, through a 5 watt Winfield Typhoon amp and my simple little board with three pedals.

So while I find the many options offered by some of the models in the Tonemaster, I’d probably end up using a couple of the reverbs, a delay, maybe a compressor and one or two amp models. The bottom line is that the only thing that changes in my settings is the reverb in my True Spring pedal.

The artist formerly known as: Synchro

When Surf Guitar is outlawed only outlaws will play Surf Guitar.

I got a TMP yesterday and am absolutely loving it. Ryan's video really inspired my purchase and I have not been disappointed. I have been using the TM Twin Reverb with a reissue Fender '63 tube reverb unit and loving the combination, but the convolution '63 spring reverb unit in the TMP has me putting the reissue tube unit up for sale- it sounds just as good to my ears. And, I am not in the same league as Ryan.

Now I fully understand how those of you in surf bands that are gigging would want the real deal tube amps, but for my bedroom studio use where cranking a tube amp is not really an option, this is the next best thing and the ability to record without micing is a godsend.

I either own or still own Axe FX III, Kemper and Helix rack units and this blows them all away for Fender sounds and the UI is brilliant and very intuitive to use. I have not even installed the editing software and I never would have attempted to tweak the Fractal, Helix or Kemper without the software.

Now I don't expect everyone in this forum to be running out and buying this thing, but people in the same boat that I am in may want to consider it as an option.

Yes, I would have been much happier with some brownfaces, but I have been participating on a Gear Page thread about the TMP where Max Gutnik, the Fender SVP in charge of the TM amps and the pro, is participating. He said they are committed to updating firmware and adding gear regularly for the next ten years. Could that be BS? Yes, but I am optimistic. I posted that "Max, you and your team hit it out of the park with this- now get back to work and make us some brownfaces." and he replied, "Right-on, Ray". Not a promise by any means but if they truly intend to add amps to this thing over time, some brownfaces would be kind of a no-brainer.

But I could live with it as-is. YMMV

Last edited: Oct 28, 2023 10:21:46

Goto Page: Previous 1 2 3
Top