The settings used:
SHADOWNIGHT5150:
I like big reverb and i cannot lie
242 days ago
SHADOWNIGHT5150:
Bank accounts are a scam created by a shadow government
242 days ago
sysmalakian:
TODAY IS MY BIRTHDAY!
229 days ago
dp:
dude
210 days ago
Bango_Rilla:
Shout Bananas!!
165 days ago
BillyBlastOff:
See you kiddies at the Convention!
149 days ago
GDW:
showman
100 days ago
Emilien03:
https://losg...
22 days ago
Pyronauts:
Happy Tanks-Kicking!!!
15 days ago
glennmagi:
CLAM SHACK guitar
20 hours ago
#ShallowEnd is empty.
No polls at this time. Check out our past polls.
No contests at this time. Check out our past contests.
Joined: Jan 04, 2011 Posts: 1588 Berlin L-Berg |
The settings used: |
Joined: Nov 04, 2013 Posts: 58 Balearic Islands |
Nice Sancho! |
Joined: Jun 05, 2010 Posts: 620 at south of |
don't know really who are the them ? for me the E is the Frv1 Last edited: Jan 19, 2015 11:30:53 |
Joined: Mar 07, 2010 Posts: 2254 North Carolina |
SanchoPansen wrote:
I'm glad you posted this. I thought the Dwell on the tube units had to be pretty near the top. Tone a lil on the dim side too - interesting. I'll have to take another listen knowing this stuff now. —Fady El Mirage @ ReverbNation |
Joined: May 20, 2009 Posts: 525 Leipzig |
Now I also know why you like the MOD pan, cause you can't really hear the tail that much with this tone setting —http://www.reverbnation.com/bangmustang |
Joined: Feb 26, 2006 Posts: 12159 Seattle |
LaFleur wrote:
People have been making a big deal about the 'tail' recently but people tend to swap the pan before trying the settings... |
Joined: Dec 11, 2011 Posts: 2121 |
I think the results will tell me that I don't know squat! |
Joined: Jun 26, 2009 Posts: 99 Austria |
Boy, that was quite a challenge! A Gomez Cheers — |
Joined: Dec 17, 2012 Posts: 519 Vienna |
Hi! http://www.surfgrammeln-san.org |
Joined: Oct 18, 2010 Posts: 650 Boston, MA |
where's the answer key? —Matt Heaton & the Electric Heaters |
Joined: Nov 16, 2013 Posts: 4536 Wisconsin |
wfoguy wrote:
Oh man I am soooooo trackin' with ya on that part. Wes DISCLAIMER: The above is opinion/suggestion only & should not be used for mission planning/navigation, tweaking of instruments, beverage selection, or wardrobe choices. |
Joined: Oct 06, 2008 Posts: 550 So Cal |
I compared in immediate succession A1,B1,C1,D1,and E1 and repeated the process for those tracks a few times. They all sound purdy good although B1 wasn't giving much dwell on the melody notes - that may be due to the setting. I preferred the sound of A1 and C1 overall but not by any great measure. -Marty "Hello Girls!" Last edited: Jan 18, 2015 13:42:59 |
Joined: Mar 09, 2014 Posts: 83 The Monadnocks, NH |
Very interesting. Gotta say that "A" was the one that most appealed to me. How much that depends on 1) its settings and 2) how similar it is to what what experience has tuned my ear to desire I cannot say. Looking forward to hearing what was what! -dom —Still rockin' after all these years! |
Joined: Aug 29, 2009 Posts: 1556 Israel |
Badger wrote:
I'm sticking with my 2 cards like a
A nice, thick STICK! |
Joined: Aug 29, 2009 Posts: 1556 Israel |
matt wrote:
Detailed in the 1st post, and by the track names Last edited: Jan 18, 2015 14:26:29 |
Joined: Jan 04, 2011 Posts: 1588 Berlin L-Berg |
Thanks for the nice comments, folks! I'm glad you all enjoy this and we can do a little quizzy with reverbs Some of you will be totally stunned by the results! But as I've mentioned already, this comparison does not show the reverbs performance in a band situation. That's something totally different. Personally I do hit my pan with a booster (which I didn't in the recordings) and I don't play a Jag with 12s (prefer the Mosrite/Hallmark sound when playing live). A short comment regarding the setup: I usually play a part on the higher notes, like the 2nd part of 'Ali Baba' or '02' in the recordings. I try to find a balance between ice-picking and drip. Set up the dwell high, to get a good amount of drip, then the mix up to the point where the reverb starts to become '3D' and finally the tone knob against the icepicking up to the 'sweet spot'. If you do it like this and you go back to the lower strings (while keeping those settings) and you still get a nice drip when playing palm muted, you basically have a nicely set up reverb sound, IMO. I decided to reveal the result in a video, as soon as I find the time. A quick question: Would you prefer to hear the samples in the video in the order of: A1, B1, C1, D1, E1, A2, B2, C2, etc. or A1, A2, A3, A4, A5, B1, B2, B3, etc.? What do you think would display the differences more precisely? —Last edited: Jan 18, 2015 15:11:29 |
Joined: Nov 16, 2013 Posts: 4536 Wisconsin |
DreadInBabylon wrote:
"Ain't nuthin' like a good piece o' hickory." Wes DISCLAIMER: The above is opinion/suggestion only & should not be used for mission planning/navigation, tweaking of instruments, beverage selection, or wardrobe choices. |
Joined: Nov 16, 2013 Posts: 4536 Wisconsin |
SanchoPansen wrote:
The first option, I think, would let folks isolate the difference easier than bouncing back & forth. Great quiz; much fun. —Wes DISCLAIMER: The above is opinion/suggestion only & should not be used for mission planning/navigation, tweaking of instruments, beverage selection, or wardrobe choices. |
Joined: May 20, 2009 Posts: 525 Leipzig |
Yes the first option is good! —http://www.reverbnation.com/bangmustang |
Joined: Jan 04, 2011 Posts: 1588 Berlin L-Berg |
Started making a video. Need to take some pics of all the units, otherwise it will be a very boring video to watch Stay tuned. After all this testing and comparing, all I can say when I hear a dry guitar is: |