Photo of the Day
Shoutbox

Bango_Rilla: Shout Bananas!!
343 days ago

BillyBlastOff: See you kiddies at the Convention!
327 days ago

GDW: showman
278 days ago

Emilien03: https://losg...
200 days ago

Pyronauts: Happy Tanks-Kicking!!!
194 days ago

glennmagi: CLAM SHACK guitar
179 days ago

Hothorseraddish: surf music is amazing
159 days ago

dp: get reverberated!
110 days ago

Clint: “A Day at the Beach” podcast #237 is TWO HOURS of NEW surf music releases. https://link...
43 days ago

Pirecords: Matthew Clark is keeping it old school and revelling in badassery.
3 days ago

Please login or register to shout.

IRC Status
  • racc

Join them in the #ShallowEnd!

Need help getting started?

Current Polls

No polls at this time. Check out our past polls.

Current Contests

No contests at this time. Check out our past contests.

Donations

Help us meet our monthly goal:

24%

24%

Donate Now

Cake June Birthdays Cake
SG101 Banner

SurfGuitar101 Forums » Surf Music General Discussion »

Permalink Who still has a turntable? or wishes they had one?

New Topic
Goto Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next

ravcon wrote:

I've got one but never use it. I just don't buy into the whole revival, and I work at a record store. I prefer the large artwork format, but it ends there. I've still got a bunch of records though, or as the kids call them "vinyls" (cringe).

The revival is not actual a revival! It's a death knell. Way too expensive...

With that said... I love the tactility of the format combined with the larger art. I'm not in it for the sound, more the physical touching and beauty.

I agree Jake, the industry is bent on killing it. Prices go up all the time. I do like the format, and I have fond memories of the experience. It has its charms, no doubt.

Mike

manfromravcon.com

ravcon wrote:

I agree Jake, the industry is bent on killing it. Prices go up all the time. I do like the format, and I have fond memories of the experience. It has its charms, no doubt.

Yep, I don't view it as a revival either, just have a significant closet full of records & may want to still play some of 'em. The tactile aspect of an album can't be ignored; kinda like the difference between reading something on a 'device' vs. holding, reading, & marking a book.

Wes
SoCal ex-pat with a snow shovel

DISCLAIMER: The above is opinion/suggestion only & should not be used for mission planning/navigation, tweaking of instruments, beverage selection, or wardrobe choices.

A friend in San Diego has a high end Stereo
And 5000k dollar turntable. He has A/B'd the cd n vinyl
Of the Bambi Molestors as the dark wave swells.
Wow, night n day. I was dumbfounded by how much better the vinyl sounded.

Jeff(bigtikidude)

Last edited: Feb 09, 2015 16:36:26

Vinyl does sound better but I'm not spending a dime to convert formats again. Records to 8 tracks to cassettes to cd's?? No way buddy. Too expensive and time consuming! But I do miss the artwork! Agree

Enjoying the surf,sun and sand!!

I have my primary turntable and a couple of backups.... the sound is not only less mechanical but you can feel the motion and actually visualize where the musicans were when they recorded it. It has depth, and is a true listening experience. The tacticallity of having a gate fold album , with a poster, post cards etc... is hard to beat.
AS well there is a whole bunch of really great material that never made it to CD, MP3 etc.....
My 2 cents worth.....lol

I am not obsolete, I am RETRO.... Cool

I do love gatefolds.

Mike

manfromravcon.com

I don't think I've ever been without a turntable. I'm spinning a record right now, as I do several times a day. I frequent a local record store once a week. Lately I've been buying a lot of old Sinatra albums.

You might say vinyl and I have a sort of relationship.

I have one, nothing crazy, but I do like playing records. Meanwhile, I have a friend who went from having no records to having several walls full of mostly new vinyl. I didn't realize you could GET several walls full of mostly new vinyl!

Matt Heaton & the Electric Heaters
Boston's Premier Surf/Noir Combo
http://www.heatonsurf.com

I have a Fisher that I bought in 1986. I used it to convert all the lp's to cd years ago. I haven't had it turned on for a few years so there is the chance that it's dead. I have bought 2 usb units and sent both of them back. Too cheap comes to mind. The difference in sound is very noticeable. Analog is "all points addressable" and digital is in steps on 10 like the metric system. There are fractions of numerical sequences that can't seem to be duplicated. Never forget that records were wore out by the needles. I read somewhere that there is a laser reader for records now. Little pricey but maybe the best ever? Smile

Still have a turntable.
Love the sound but not on all new vinyl.
Some new vinyl is gimmick only. If the recordings weren't captured in a format that can use the bandwidth of vinyl then there will be no difference to the listener between CD and vinyl.
Not all old vinyl is king either.
An original pressing of Derek and The Dominos sounds like shit compared with the re-mastered CD. Great music, great playing, not so great mixing and mastering (and I love Tom Dowd)
The records that are and were recorded in a format that benefits from being distributed on vinyl are beautiful, have dimension and can be very close to being in the room with the musician.
I've never been into trends so that part kind of wears on me and like Mike (Ravcon) I hate when the younger folks use the phrase "vinyls" but I have been known to be a curmudgeon and as long as they are buying and listening to music it's cool with me.

http://www.facebook.com/CrazyAcesMusic
http://www.youtube.com/user/crazyacesrock
http://www.reverbnation.com/crazyacesmusic

The mere marketing of the older vinyl jackets alone outreaches CD's. Look at the awesome Alice Cooper "KIllers" gatefold with the calendar ( took me years to find one that hadnt been ripped out) ...or Pink Floyds "Wish you were here " with the stickers or Kiss " Love Gun" or.....the list goes on...
Whats better than a gatefold....a trifold cover....
It may be a revival for the younger folks but some of us never quit listeneing to it. Big Grin

I am not obsolete, I am RETRO.... Cool

CrazyAces wrote:

An original pressing of Derek and The Dominos sounds like shit compared with the re-mastered CD. Great music, great playing, not so great mixing and mastering (and I love Tom Dowd)

One of my personal favorites, and I can vouch for your statement!

I have an acquaintance who was the engineer for one of the classical nominated Grammys last night. Years ago he played 2 CD versions of the same recording for people (in a blind test), adding the white noise from records on one. More people seemed to prefer the CD with the white noise. Not scientific, but interesting none-the-less.

Rev

Canadian Surf

http://www.urbansurfkings.com/

JakeDobner wrote:

CrazyAces wrote:

An original pressing of Derek and The Dominos sounds like shit compared with the re-mastered CD. Great music, great playing, not so great mixing and mastering (and I love Tom Dowd)

One of my personal favorites, and I can vouch for your statement!

+2; that's a perfect example. Awhile back a friend put that in the player during a trip like he wanted me to listen to something he'd just discovered.
"Holy...!" My record doesn't sound like that; I went & bought the CD.

Wes
SoCal ex-pat with a snow shovel

DISCLAIMER: The above is opinion/suggestion only & should not be used for mission planning/navigation, tweaking of instruments, beverage selection, or wardrobe choices.

Last edited: Feb 09, 2015 20:36:58

That Derek and the Dominos sounds like an exception. For newer stuff I think the main advantage vinyl has is packaging, but older stuff usually sounds better to me. For instance I just got an original Lloyd Thaxton Goes Surfing with the Challengers and finally actually enjoyed it. The CD reissues I'd heard took all the life out of it. So thin sounding, no punch.

Storm Surge of Reverb: Surf & Instro Radio

The early CDs sound bad, all that Beatles, Dylan, Kinks, Elvis Costello, Neil Young(among others).

The reissued version of a lot of these albums sounds amazing, and better than the original vinyl.

Mastering got a lot better in the 80s(from what these ears hear), having improved upon the 60s Mastering throughout the 70s.

Ultimately, it doesn't make an album better or worse. But we, as fans, just want to hear the album in the best possible way possible. Still some of my fondest musical memories was listening to Derek and the Dominos after I discovered the vinyl at a goodwill. I owned 6 copies at one point, having scoured thrift stores across the Seattle area for cheap music to buy in the late 90s/early 2000s.

I just recently moved, and in our new neighborhood was an estate sale and I landed the Exotica collection I had always dreamed of for a meer 7$ I unpacked my turn table to find the arm snapped in two... It's been years since I had room in entertainment cab to hook it up too. My last CD player died and had the space, I was going to go older school... Looks like I'll be waiting yet again to hear a real record.

revhank wrote:

I have an acquaintance who was the engineer for one of the classical nominated Grammys last night. Years ago he played 2 CD versions of the same recording for people (in a blind test), adding the white noise from records on one. More people seemed to prefer the CD with the white noise. Not scientific, but interesting none-the-less.

Rev

That is interesting!
I actually prefer most classical (baroque, romantic, opera etc) on CD unless it's a solo or small ensemble performnace.

Cheers,
Jeff

http://www.facebook.com/CrazyAcesMusic
http://www.youtube.com/user/crazyacesrock
http://www.reverbnation.com/crazyacesmusic

ElMonstroPorFavor wrote:

That Derek and the Dominos sounds like an exception. For newer stuff I think the main advantage vinyl has is packaging, but older stuff usually sounds better to me. For instance I just got an original Lloyd Thaxton Goes Surfing with the Challengers and finally actually enjoyed it. The CD reissues I'd heard took all the life out of it. So thin sounding, no punch.

It's only an exception because of it's recent remastering.
Like Jake said, when CD's came out the companies hastily transfered catalogs and did a horrible job so most earlier rock n roll sounds like ass on CD's until recently or even still so I agree with you Hunter. We all had to live with pretty horrible sounding Beatles on CD for what....? 20 years before it was done better but I still prefer the Parlophone vinyl.
I have some Duane Eddy on CD. A copy of "Have Twangy Guitar Will Travel" on mono vinyl will make one believe the CD versions are from a cassette. The difference is startling!
And then there's Jazz.
A Clifford Brown CD is a good listen but the vinyl versions will physically and emotionally move you.
Music made and documented with vibrations, not crunched up numbers

Cheers,
Jeff

http://www.facebook.com/CrazyAcesMusic
http://www.youtube.com/user/crazyacesrock
http://www.reverbnation.com/crazyacesmusic

Goto Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next
Top