Menu
Let's face it Brian, we don't really need any
additional reasons other than we just do.....and It's
been my favorite guitar since 1964......I'll get off
the soap box and go have a beer......I love the sight
of a white Jazzmaster in the morning........ed.....
--- Brian Neal <> wrote:
> --- In , John McCorvey
> <eddiekatcher@y...> wrote:
> > Boy Brian, I am impressed....one question, in the
> case
> > of a Jazzmaster, Jaguar, or any other guitar where
> the
> > strings pass over a bridge and are anchored behind
> as
> > say the mentioned, doesn't this additional length
> add
> > an additional variable to your equation.....
>
> Yeah I'm sure it does...but I have no idea how to
> characterize that.
> I am *really* on shaky physics ground now and had
> probably just better
> shut up. :-) You could probably say that the
> Jazzmaster would have a
> longer *effective* string length compared to a Strat
> because of the
> string length behind the bridge, even though it
> doesn't contribute as
> much because it is bent over the bridge. And maybe
> as a result you
> would get *slighly* lower string tension than a
> strat. But again, I
> should just shut up here...I can hear the ice
> cracking under my feet...
>
> My physics professor in college was undertaking all
> kinds of crazy
> measurements of vibrating strings in musical
> instruments. Apparently
> if you look really close, it's not a well understood
> phenomenon.
>
> BN
>
>
>
>
>
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
--- In , John McCorvey
<eddiekatcher@y...> wrote:
> Let's face it Brian, we don't really need any
> additional reasons other than we just do.....and It's
> been my favorite guitar since 1964......I'll get off
> the soap box and go have a beer......I love the sight
> of a white Jazzmaster in the morning........ed.....
Jazzmasters do indeed rock, sir.
BN
