SG101 logo
SG101 Banner

Photo of the Day

The Noble Gasses
The Noble Gasses

IRC Status
  • racc
Current Polls
  • No polls at this time. Check out our past polls.
Current Contests
Donations

Help us meet our monthly goal:

35%

Donate Now

April Birthdays

Yahoo Group Archives »

Re: [SurfGuitar101] In the bowels of the ($399) beast

Marty Tippens (mctippens) - 01 Apr 2004 00:41:24

Yes Jerry,
The upper controls on the Q series give a very smooth sound but I don't have P
series with which to make the comparison.
-Marty
----- Original Message -----
From: Jerry
To:
Sent: Wednesday, March 31, 2004 9:45 PM
Subject: RE: [SurfGuitar101] In the bowels of the ($399) beast
4) The upper roller pots are 850k, but I couldn't read the other values
on the lower pots for all the wires!
Hi,
Having a CIJ "P" series myself, I noticed that the uper rollers have a
1x500K and 1x1K pots. I asume the factory changed these when the went to
the "Q" series.
As for the trem spring, there seams to be a lot of difference there,
even among CIJ models. I had no problem whatsoever to put 0.11 flats on
my "P" series JM. I only had to tweak the tuss rod a bit. A friend of
mine has replaced all his MIJ/CIJ tailpieces with MIA and even there are
differences between the springs and there tension. These are very
notable. My MIJ Jag has a noteable heavier spring then the CIJ JM.
I asume that they adjust the parts in the factory, perhaps because of
shortage or as an improvement. The Upper (rythem cuircuit) sounds very
mellow with the 500k/1Meg controls (with the CIJ pups), perhaps the 850K
are smoother?
-Jerry S
.
Visit for archived messages,
bookmarks, files, polls, etc.
Yahoo! Groups Sponsor
ADVERTISEMENT
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Yahoo! Groups Links
a.. To visit your group on the web, go to:
b.. To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
c.. Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

See this post in context.