Menu
Gavin Ehringer <> wrote:
And as to paint, I am sure the nitrocellose laquer is a desireable
finish ? extremely thin, hard, quick drying, beautiful in its luster
and depth, and perhaps with sonic properties that make it superior to
the poly-wrapping that is used in other finishes. Props to Fender
America for bringing it back.
Gavin
Having had the pleasure(?) of stripping a number of Fenders, I did find that the
Japanese poly was thinner than their non-nitro US and MIM counterparts. Just my
2 cents.
--- In , dave wronski <stickmandw@y...>
wrote:
> A few thoughts: MIJ vs. CIJ may involve may more wiggle room with
regards to taking advantage of the International Division of Labor.
Any lawers out there?
>
> The US Jags & Jazzmasters have superior metal parts. The collit that
holds the trem bar is brass on the imports, and hardened steel on the
US models. The materials and engineering involved with the US Fender
Jag and Jazzmaster are more costly. The magnets are a "High HC"
material that was used by Fender for only a couple of years in the
early 60s. For Bill Turner {Fender pickup designer} to be able to
figure out the reason why he heard a difference in sound in those old
pickups would require Fender to spend some ca$h.
>
> The paint used on the imports is polyester {plastic} The US guitars
are eurathane, or Nitro laquer, depending on the model. Shooting
lacquer in California required Fender to build a 5.5 million dollar
paint facility.
>
> Old guitars can sound better because of superior woods like
Brazilian Rosewood fret boards that are not legally available now.
Neck shapes in the old days, in my opinion, had to satisfy a
professional player, not so much the less critical, casual owners of
today. That might be the reason why trying to copy those old shapes
for a small minority, is such a passion.
> My white MIJ Jag with it's polyester paint, and basswood body has a
great neck, which is why I like all the Japan Fenders so much. The
basswood on the Japan guitars is a different variety than we get in
the states, as I was told by the head of Fender R&D. US guitars are a
little too wide for my thumb-over big stretches. Too bad for me
because everything else is so right. Of course there is always the
Custom Shop, which has been making some great Jag and JMaster
one-offs, which, a few I've tried.
> I guess that's enough rambling!
> -dave
>
>
> Gavin Ehringer <gavinehringer@e...> wrote:This is not an attack on
Richard, just my own musings!
>
> ------
>
> I am always amused about the US versus Japanese versus Mexican versus
> vintage controversies and opinions regarding Fenders. I think there is
> a certain amount of nationalistic pride and xenophobia when people
> assert that the standard-production U.S. guitars are better and the
> vintage guitars are best. And a certain amount of nostalgia too.
>
> Isn't it a bit simplistic to think that Americans made better guitars
> in the 1950s & 60s than they do today, and also believe they make
> better guitars now than do the workers in Mexico, Japan and Korea?
>
> I've owned a Mexican '50s Strat, a '96 Jap Jag, and an American Fat
> Strat. I loved the tone and feel of the imports much better (granted,
> the Fat Strat didn't really suit surf/rockabilly roots music). But as
> far as set-up, finish, hardware, and overall quality, it would be
> impossible to say that one was better than another.
>
> Most of the cost differences among imports versus US made are simply
> labor ? and I don't think US workers are any more conscientious than
> the Japanese. That's why I drive a Honda.
>
> Certainly, these low-budget Jags and Jazzmasters won't be of the same
> quality as the American '62 Reissues (nor were they intended to be),
> but I am confident they aren't much worse than or different from the
> original Fender Jags and Jazzes, which were made at a time when quality
> control and manufacturing technology weren't at the high standards of
> today. I know Leo ran a tight ship, but I also know he and his floor
> workers cut corners when need-be ? and it shows up in a lot of vintage
> guitars. (Ever seen a sunburst pattern bleeding through under a custom
> color? That's 'cause rather than strip a botched sunburst paint job,
> they'd just shoot a custom color over it and add $5 to the price!
> Which, to me, made perfect sense).
>
> The only mods I made to my Jap Jaguar to get "that sound" were some SD
> pickups that were more to my liking, plus new bridge saddle barrels and
> heavier gage strings to solve a mild buzzing. Total cost for guitar +
> $425 used, plus $50 for pups, $25 for saddles = $500). To me, it seems
> these inexpensive Jags and Jazzmasters might just be worth it. Besides,
> they'll always hold a resale close to these bargain-basement prices.
>
> Too much time on my hands,
>
> Gavin
>
>
> > At $399.99 the Japanese JM seems like a killer deal,
> > hands-down, but whenever you a buy a cheaper guitar
> > there is always going to be a question of value...
>
>
>
>
> .
> Visit for archived
messages, bookmarks, files, polls, etc.
>
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Do you Yahoo!?
> Yahoo! Finance Tax Center - File online. File on time.
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
.
Visit for archived messages,
bookmarks, files, polls, etc.
---------------------------------
Yahoo! Groups Links
To visit your group on the web, go to:
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
---------------------------------
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Finance Tax Center - File online. File on time.
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
