SG101 logo
SG101 Banner

Photo of the Day

Glasgow Tiki Shakers
Glasgow Tiki Shakers

IRC Status
  • racc
Current Polls
  • No polls at this time. Check out our past polls.
Current Contests
Donations

Help us meet our monthly goal:

27%

Donate Now

May Birthdays

Yahoo Group Archives »

Re: N.O.S. // how do you try them out?

viktor423 - 29 Mar 2002 00:40:26

Try Svetlana tubes, They are much closer to the old sylvania or GE
tubes. I used to have Ruby's in my amp but was dissatisfied with the
tone. Generaly speaking, Chineese tubes aren't that
great.
--- In SurfGuitar101@y..., Damon <dei77@y...> wrote:
>
> It is impossible to tell if a tube has never been used (unless it
came from some factory where they are all just sitting sealed - where
they are "suppose" to come from). The tubes shouldn't be damaged
after use if they unless they're abused. In other words, old tubes
that still work are old stock, but not new and it is very difficult
to tell. Tube testers will tell you if a tube is working properly,
but they only show that the tube will work, not that the amp will
sound musically pleasing. Thats why I suggest testing tubes with an
amp. Its not hard to pull them in and out. You have to make sure
that your amp can handle different tubes without biasing, but other
than that, changing the tubes is no big thing. I have 3 sets of
tubes for my RI bassman: the original burnt-out ones, some NOS
Chinese tubes that sound OK and some Rubys that sound louder and
tougher than the NOS, but still just sound OK. The reason I suggest
testing them, is that I was told these Ruby tubes would improve my
sound a great deal. They changed the sound, but not to my liking.
Perhaps the tubes I would have liked were the ones next to the Ruby's
in the case, but I didn't know because I didn't try 'em. Bottom
line, trust your ears. My advice in a nutshell: buy tubes that sound
the best to you and don't replace working tubes without a good
reason.
> Damon
>
>
>
> ---------------------------------
> Do You Yahoo!?
> Yahoo! Movies - coverage of the 74th Academy Awards®
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

See this post in context.