Menu
hey phil,
i put the sample up. direct.mp3. its just each string
plucked and sustained, straight into the board, no EQ
or nothin.
thanks for sticking with me !
neal
--- Phil Dirt <> wrote:
> What does the guitar sound like plugged in directly
> - that is,
> completely un-colored and not amplified.
>
> More lows, but as someone noted, mushy and
> indistinct, as if they are
> not there to begin with.
>
> Play a couple of fully sustained notes from the
> guitar only on each
> string (open, no fretting). Put up that sample.
>
> Trying to solve any process problem with many
> variables being tweaked
> together only leads to more chaos unless by sheer
> luck you step in it
> and the "it" is the answer instead of a variant of
> the pile you started
> with.
>
> Guitar alone - what does it sound like?
> Guitar and amp, what can you do there?
> Only later can you insert more toys and then just
> one at a time until
> you get it worked out. Each new toy may cause you to
> go back and twek
> something else, but at least you have a starting
> point. When you go
> back, tweak only one thing at a time. If it doesn't
> do what yu want it
> tp, then reset everything to where they were before
> proceeding.
>
> While the new sample sounds better, it's all about
> delay. The tone is
> not very pleasing. It is not very rich, and it's
> placid. In a mix, it
> will be less harshly judged. It's certainly not a
> strong sound. If it's
> not strong to begin with, doctoring is not going to
> get the best
> result.
>
> Phil
>
> --- "Neal S." <> wrote:
>
> > thanks for the feedback ! your email, couldnt have
> > come at a better time, because your basically
> telling
> > me everything ive been kinda suddenly realizing
> about
> > this last week.
> >
> > let me first tell you the signal chain of new
> sample
> > 10$ mic > crate 1x12 (solid state amp) > the
> behringer
> > eurorack mixer, 24/96 soundcard.
> >
> > I could not for the life of squeeze anything out
> of
> > the POD. I did get one acceptable sample, but i
> had
> > the Eq turned up on everything to the max, the
> POD,
> > the board, and about 4 stacked module plugins.
> when i
> > played quietly it sounded about the 'presense' and
> > level of guitars i hear on cd. however when i
> strummed
> > a chord it was all distortion because of the max
> > volume.
> >
> > so i gave it up for the mic/amp combo, and stuck
> the
> > amp in my closet ( 3' x 3' x 3' with clothes ). my
> new
> > saying i guess is "F the neighbors !"
> >
> > Now im very inexperienced at micing an amp, so im
> know
> > theres still plenty of room for that. this
> particular
> > sample it was placed about 2 inches from the grill
> off
> > axis. like i said straight XLR into the mixer. no
> EQ,
> > just whatever tone i got out of the amp. also into
> a
> > reverb standalone VST plug-in.
> >
> > i just bought a book ! its callled "modern
> recording
> > techniques" by huber and runstein. so i got my
> nose in
> > that. your right, i shoulda went here first.
> >
> > about the behringer/cheap gear thing. i bought the
> > behringer, cause well, they steal schematics from
> > mackie. i have a bunch of friends that use mackie
> i
> > know that when i presented them the behringer vs
> > mackie argument, they were only fighting my in
> > 'reliability' not 'sound quality'. none the less,
> im
> > seeing that it is crap.
> >
> > I subscribe to this free magazine called tapeop (
> > which if your a home recorder, you should
> definitly
> > get )
> > anyway i recently bought their book of collection
> of
> > articles ( surf content : they interviewd MOAM )
> and
> > it seems like almost everyone is geting great
> sound
> > albums
> > with a shure SM57, an ART tube pre mic amp, and a
> > tascam 4 track. now surely this isnt expensive
> gear, i
> > mean i could go buy all that used for probaly
> $150.
> >
> > what do would you say to someone presenting you
> with
> > this data? these last 2 weeks, ive been looking to
> buy
> > a mic pre amp, i have no idea what to get or where
> to
> > start. ive also am going to replace the mic, sm57
> ?
> > Nady makes these starpower mics for 7$ that have
> been
> > heavily compared to the sm57/58.
> >
> > finally, thanks for the sound/tone advice. im
> going to
> > get right to work on your suggestions.
> >
> > thanks WR !
> > neal
> >
> >
> > PS, if you or anyone at home would like to send me
> > thier own sample of just a home recorded guitar,
> to
> > show me what it should sound like, and the gear
> you
> > use. that would probaly help me out.
> >
> >
> >
> > --- mono_tones_1 <> wrote:
> >
> > > Hi Neal
> > >
> > > busy figuring out recording myself, I'm both
> > > sympathetic and
> > > interested in your problems. having said that,
> I'm
> > > for all practical
> > > purposes as unexperienced as you are, and my
> > > approach is 'from
> > > scratch', so, really, my advice can and perhaps
> > > should be taken with
> > > a grain of salt. - perhaps one of the more
> > > experienced sound guru's
> > > can elaborate on the points I'm about to make?
> btw,
> > > best tip is at
> > > the bottom so keep readin' ;-)
> > >
> > > your new sample sound a lot better indeed, BUT,
> it
> > > seems to me that
> > > the extra lows are very mushy, while the highs
> are
> > > still a bit thin
> > > and 'digital' sounding ... this might result in
> just
> > > adding mush to
> > > mix, because the well defined lows will come
> out,
> > > but the mushy lows
> > > might drown in the other lows... you'd have to
> check
> > > it in a mix
> > > though.
> > >
> > > i checked your recording line in the 'old' post,
> > > assume your still
> > > working with that gear. I noticed there is quite
> a
> > > lot there, and
> > > most if not all not professional level. Now, I
> work
> > > with the same
> > > kind of gear, and my theory is, that adding
> 'cheap'
> > > gear, will
> > > add 'cheap' sound. the absurdly blunt rule of
> thumb
> > > I use is "don't
> > > add anything that says 'behringer' till you
> really
> > > need it". and that
> > > doesn't just mean switch it of, but get it out
> of
> > > the signal chain.
> > > Not to put behringer or any company down (I'm
> using
> > > the name
> > > behringer metaforically here, cause everyone
> puts
> > > 'em down, but it
> > > goes for all cheap brands, adn quite frankly, I
> am
> > > impressed with
> > > what they can offer for little cash), they did a
> > > great job making
> > > recording stuff available for the masses, and
> you
> > > got to love that,
> > > and their stuff works pretty well, but still:
> they
> > > do have lesser
> > > sound quality then pro-stuff, you'll likely be a
> > > victim of
> > > inexperienced use, you have more cables, these
> > > things add to the risk
> > > that what your adding doesn't do what you want
> it
> > > to, and does do
> > > what you don't want it to do! that's at least my
> > > experience.
> > >
> > > there's a moddeler in your line - have you
> tweaked
> > > the moddeler's
> > > controls to the full, couldn't the problem be
> there?
> > > what kind is it?
> > > I have one built in in the vs880, and it's
> pretty
> > > useless for guitar
> > > (workable for bass tho)
> > >
> > > have you thought about changing the moddeler for
> an
> > > amp and mic? And
> > > before you say 'bedroom - neighbours', get this:
> > > Tres Manos from
> > > Dutch hiphop rockband Urban Dance Squad recorded
> his
> > > guitar through a
> > > battery powerd desktop mini marshall - you know,
> the
> > > ones that
> > > measure 3 by 5 inch ... mic in front - massive
> > > sound! (and this is
> > > not just internet urban legend - I sold the guy
> a
> > > guitar a while ago,
> > > and I asked about it.)
> > >
> > > and here's the best tip: buy a book on
> recording.
> > > Amazon has a bunch,
> > > for less then what a decent 12ax7 costs, and
> they'll
> > > do more for your
> > > recording then any piece of equipment. I bought
> > > 'home recording for
> > > dummies' a while back, and as crude and entry
> level
> > > as it is, it
> > > helped me understand so much about what the F i
> was
> > > trying to do.
> > > maybe someone has better suggestions for books.
> > >
> > > thanks for posting, let's keep this thread going
> for
> > > those
> > > interested,
> > >
> > > WR
> > >
> > >
> > > --- In , "Neal S."
> > > <memoryover@y...>
> > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > phil, and anyone else,
> > > >
> > > > ive been workin furiously trying to obtain a
> > > better
> > > > tone ! can you please check out sample9b.mp3
> in
> > > the
> > > > NealCraptar folder in the files section ? let
> me
> > > know
> > > > if its more workable, or if i should go back
> to
> > > the
> > > > drawing board.
> > > >
> > > > thanks !
> > > >
> > > > neal
> > > >
> > > > --- Phil Dirt <phildirt@r...> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > Neal, a quick listen displayed a really dead
> and
> > > > > colorless tone. The
> > > > > word that comes to mind is "brittle."
> Strings?
> > > > > Pickups? Amp?
> > > > >
> > > > > A quick look with EQ and you have almost no
> low
> > > > > frequencies (where the
> > > > > beef is) and no highs at all (harmonics and
> > > color).
> > > > >
> > > > > A quick monkeying with reverb pointed out
> making
> > > it
> > > > > sound powerful and
> > > > > rich requires solving the problem with the
> > > > > guitar/amp.
> > > > >
> > > > > Since you said that sample 2 was virtually
> > > direct, I
> > > > > am assuming that
> > > > > the guitar is the problem, either strings or
> > > pickups
> > > > > or they was you
> > > > > set your controls. If by direct you don't
> mean
> > > > > direct, but just mean
> > > > > ampo flat, then the amp may still be the
> > > problem.
> > > > >
> > > > > I can see why you're troubled. The only
> other
> > > time
> > > > > I've heard this dead
> > > > > a tone was once with Leslita of the
> Neptunas.
> > > With
> > > > > major doctoring, it
> > > > > only rose to marginally acceptable.
> > > > >
> > > > > Here are links to quickly doctored version.
> This
> > > is
> > > > > NOT what you'd do
> > > > > to fix this, but comapre to your originals.
> Even
> > > > > with the extreme bass
> > > > > boost I used, there's little beef here.
> > > > >
> > > > >
>
> > > > >
>
> > > > >
> > > > > Phil
> > > > >
> > > > > --- "Neal S." <memoryover@y...> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > ---------------------------------
> > > > > alright phil and others,
> > > > >
> > > > > please help me out. there are 2 samples in
> the
> > > FILES
> > > > > section on this yahoo group. the folder is
> > > called
> > > > >
> > > > > "NealCraptar"
> > > > >
> > > > > sample 1 : is with head and cab modeling.
> > > > > sample 2 : is pretty much just DI without
> the
> > > amp
> > > > > modeling
> > > > >
> > > > > both were recroded with fat strat, some EQ (
> > > that i
> > > > > always use ) and a behringer mixer as a pre
> amp
> > > ( to
> > > > > match up impedence ) and a little reverb.
> Also
> > > they
> > > > > were run through a tube amp compressor, but
> with
> > > > > unity
> > > > > gain.
> > > > >
> > > > > now, ive never been in a studio, and have
> just
> > > heard
> > > > > the guitar coming through the monitors. how
> do
> > > my
> > > > > samples differ ? would you suggest i work on
> the
> > > > > modeled sound, or the strictly DI sound. or
> > > scratch
> > > > > both. and anything else you can think of.
> > > > >
> > > > > thanks, i appreciate this
> > > > >
> > > > > neal
> > > > >
> > > > > --- Phil Dirt <phildirt@r...> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > that's novel - let's try it.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > --- "Neal S." <memoryover@y...> wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > ---------------------------------
> > > > > > thanks phil, i can try most of these,
> > > viturally of
> > > > > > course ! if i post some quick riffs of
> just
> > > > > guitar,
> > > > > > can you tell me how they compare to more
> > > > > > professional
> > > > > > recordin
> > > > > gs and how you might go about adjusting them
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > .
> > > > > Visit
> > >
> > > > > for archived
> > > > > messages, bookmarks, files, polls, etc.
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > ---------------------------------
> > > > > YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > Visit your group "SurfGuitar101" on the
> web.
> > > > >
> > > > > To unsubscribe from this group, send an
> > > email
> > > > > to:
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to
> the
> > > > > Yahoo! Terms of
> > > > > Service.
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > ---------------------------------
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> > ------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor
> > --------------------~-->
> > Get fast access to your favorite Yahoo! Groups.
> Make Yahoo! your home
> > page
> >
>
> >
>
--------------------------------------------------------------------~->
> >
> >
> > .
> > Visit
> for archived
> > messages, bookmarks, files, polls, etc.
> >
> > Yahoo! Groups Links
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
>
>
>
