SG101 logo
SG101 Banner

Photo of the Day

The Mystery Men?
The Mystery Men?

IRC Status
  • racc
Current Polls
  • No polls at this time. Check out our past polls.
Current Contests
Donations

Help us meet our monthly goal:

0%

Donate Now

May Birthdays

Yahoo Group Archives »

Re: [SurfGuitar101] Re: Miserlou-Best Version?

billyblastoff805 - 15 Aug 2005 22:21:46

Absolutely Phil!! I can't wait until The Surf Coasters come back around. Those
dudes are phenomenal!!
Now if you really want to blow some minds, let's get Wronski and Shigeo together
and do their live version of "Miserlou" together on the same
stage...............
I'm not sure if the world is ready.................
Billy
---- Phil Dirt <> wrote:
> standard electric - I'm biased from watching Shigeo play it in the Pit!
> Stunning!
>
> --- Jacob Dobner <> wrote:
>
>
> ---------------------------------
> Phil,
>
> When you mention the Surf Coasters as doing your favorite version of
> Misirlou do you mean their standard electric version or their acoustic
> version?
>
> --- In , Phil Dirt <phildirt@r...> wrote:
> > It's been around the lists many times already - google will get you
> all
> > that yu need to know. It was written ages ago, a
> "Greek/Mediterranean"
> > pop song and later "folk" dance, first committed to rock format years
> > before Dick Dale and his Del-tones by several, but none as firehose
> > intense before that magical day in 1962 when I first heard DD's on
> > KFWB.
> >
> >
> >
> > Phil
> >
> > --- SPF-4 <dk@p...> wrote:
> > Who/what band wrote the original?
> >
> > DK
>
>
>
>
> .
> Visit for archived
> messages, bookmarks, files, polls, etc.
>
>
>
>
> ---------------------------------
> YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS
>
>
> Visit your group "SurfGuitar101" on the web.
>
> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
>
>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of
> Service.
>
>
> ---------------------------------
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> .
> Visit for archived messages,
bookmarks, files, polls, etc.
>
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>
>
>

See this post in context.