Menu
Phil,
Ha! And here I was thinking I was going to get away with using a blanket term
...
Thanks for the correction,
-Warren
Phil Dirt <> wrote:
Not arguing, but lo-fi generally implies a cruddy analog recording,
cheaply produced with ambient and/or murky sound, sometimes distorted
in the analog sense (saturated). This is digitally clipped, which is
quite different. It seems to me to be a mastering thing, not a
recording thing. Beneath the grating clipped audio seems to be decent
original tracks. Downgraded to lo-fi by clipping. That's my take.
--- Warren Binder wrote:
...there's no arguing that it's definitely lo-fi...
-Warren
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
