SG101 logo
SG101 Banner

Photo of the Day

The Mystery Men?
The Mystery Men?

IRC Status
  • racc
Current Polls
  • No polls at this time. Check out our past polls.
Current Contests
Donations

Help us meet our monthly goal:

0%

Donate Now

May Birthdays

Yahoo Group Archives »

Re: analog versus digital (vintage/lo-fi)

supertwangreverb - 22 Jul 2005 15:08:51

>
> anyone out there have a preference re: recording to analod
> versus recording to digital? anyone still using tape
> during the recording phase? any analog mastering going on
> out there? any analog distribution (vinyl or cassettes)?
>
We did our recordings analog but then dumped them on to the computer
for final mixing. Does that still count?
The tape recorder we used wasn't TOO old. It was an old 8 track
from the 70s I believe. I found it to be a lot of hassle and
worrying about the tape running out during recording. I really know
NOTHING about recoring or recording techniques, so I'm probably not
the best guy to respond to this, however I do find it interesting.
One thing I've found is that a lot of recording engineers like to
keep the amps in seperate rooms, closets, etc. When we did this I
didn't like the sound, so we tried recording everything in one big
room, but still using multiple microphones. I think doing it that
way captures much more of a live sound. Everything sounded stale
when I had my amp in the closet. Again, my knowledge in recording
techinques in minimal.
Bill

See this post in context.