Menu
I would not know where to find the schematics; likely, it is the Fender circuit,
but can't
confirm. I only pointed out the tubes because most of us replace the original
Fender
Reverb Reissue power tube with a NOS 6K6, which is an expense. Add to that the
extra
controls, and again, it might justify the cost.
What I want to know is, how does it sound? BTW, they use the same accutronics
tank as
Fender uses for its unit. I am confident it is NOT point-to-point wired at that
price.
Yes, the Marshall look is most unfortunate. ;-)
Gavin
> do you have a place where we can look at the schematics? wonder if
> it's a copy of the fender schematic.
>
> fwiw - that remark about the correct tubes don't mean j.s., you can
> score nos 6k6's on ebay for next to nothing, and even my Tilburg,
> netherlands local electronics store carries JAN GE 5751's. converting
> to a 2 or 3 band eq should be fairly easy too.
> what would be a big improvement is an eq on both clean AND reverb
> signal.
> My current belief is that, next to tubes, the reverb tray itself is
> the biggest factor in deciding the sound, and as has been discussed
> before, differences in those are just part of the deal.
>
> anyway. if it is ptp and delivers surf reverb, it sure looks like a
> better bang for the buck then the RI fender unit.
>
> but why for the love of god does it look like Marshall???????????????
>
> WR
