Jon
Joined: Mar 15, 2006
Posts: 1076
Columbus, OH
|
Posted on Mar 15 2006 11:20 AM
Hi everybody, I have been wondering about vintage/reissue amps. I recently purchased a Fender '63 reissue reverb unit, and I'm looking for a really good amp to plug it into. I want to get a good traditional surf sound. What kind of amp would you suggest?
|
dp
Joined: Feb 26, 2006
Posts: 3546
mojave desert, california
|
Posted on Mar 15 2006 12:17 PM
Are you looking for a "new" or "reissue" type amp?
Or, are you looking for a vintage amp?
In the new/reissue department, I would suggest the Fender Bassman Combo reissue. It has plenty of stage power and a good complement of speakers.
Also, I have heard very good things about the Traynor Tube Amps.
As far as vintage amps got, the favorite seems to be the Fender Showman.
-dp
|
JakeDobner
Joined: Feb 26, 2006
Posts: 12159
Seattle
|
Posted on Mar 15 2006 12:27 PM
In the cheaper range, a used reissue Vibroverb or Vibrolux.
|
skeeter
Joined: Feb 27, 2006
Posts: 2063
Virginia, USA
|
Posted on Mar 15 2006 12:47 PM
The Twin Reverb Custom 15.
I've been Jonesing for one since they came out.
-Paul
— Paul
Atomic Mosquitos
Bug music for bug people is here!
Killers from Space
|
BillAqua
Joined: Feb 27, 2006
Posts: 1054
Chicago IL.
|
Posted on Mar 15 2006 02:06 PM
I think out of the current Fender Vintage Reissue line the Twin 2x12 is going to get you the clean sound associated with surf. I've never been much of a Twin guy, but I have a '65 Super Reverb, and the reissues I've played pale in comparrison to the artifact. The Twin 15 may be better for surf, it's got the 15 like the single Showman, but one main component to what makes the Showman sound so good is the ported cab.
For what you will be spending on a reissue amp you may be able to get a beat up blackface Bandmaster(my personal favorite) or a Bassman. I traded stuff for my Bandmaster, but I probably could have gotten it for under 800 bucks, and the piggy back amp looks much cooler than the combo.
— "as he stepped into the stealthy night air... little did he know the fire escape was not there"
https://www.facebook.com/reluctantaquanauts/
https://www.facebook.com/TheDragstripVipers/
|
kick_the_reverb
Joined: Feb 26, 2006
Posts: 1337
Escondido, CA
|
Posted on Mar 15 2006 03:16 PM
Since we're rehashing old topics here for the sake of posterity, I'd reccomend staying away from the reissue line, as:
1. They're expensive for what they are.
2. They don't sound like the original.
3. They suffer from reliabilty problems (witnessed first hand many times).
For the same amount of money, you could buy an early silverface amp, have it blackfaced and rebuilt, and then you'll have a realiable good sounding amp, which will not drop in value.
These suggestions apply mostly for someone who is going to use the amp in a band. But, even for a semi-bedroom player, there is better value in having a true point to point wired amp. If you are a bedroom player and you find a re-issue for a really really cheap price, I guess it wouldn't be that bad.
The reissue line is different from the custom shop amp, which are another animal, a very expensive one (but good sounding for the most part).
Also, points 1-3 are based on my experience, some people might disagree, and all the best to them. A long argument about how someone couldn't tell the difference between a vinatge amp and a reissue is not neccesary.
Ran
— The Scimitars
|
krupanut
Joined: Feb 27, 2006
Posts: 492
Austin Texas
|
Posted on Mar 15 2006 04:04 PM
Playing through a Showman for the first time is a dangerous thing.
Once you do it you'll want one bad!
And they're getting really pricey.
Its the watts along with the big 15 that gives the Showman that huge ultra clean sound and the guys in the band hearing loss
The Bassman (50watts) and Bandmaster(40watts) are just as good, they just don't have the head room that the Showman(80watts) has but who of us really needs all that power. I doubt any of us is booked at the Rendezvous Ballroom in the near future. So the Bassman and Bandmaster are great choices. One of these three is really the ultimate for the trad surf sound.
The other good option is the brown Concert with 4 tens but again a rare amp pulling down prime price tags, and not as shimmering tone as the piggy back amps.
Twins all ways sound too harsh to me.
I agree that the RI. are too much cash compared to the real thing to make them worth it, unlike the RI tanks.
All that said there are good options out there for folks who can't /don't want to spend a grand or more for a vintage amp.
The sears 1484 twin twelve piggy back amps from 63-66 can be great surf amps.
They're plenty loud and clean if in good condition. If not well...
I actually play through a solid state 4X12 Standel.
The solid state Stadels are the best kept secret around.
Bob Crooks was one of the pioneers of solid state amps and knew how to make them sound great with out the harshness of the other early solid staters. The best thing about them is you can still find them cheap.
I paid $300 for mine.
It is a stop gap deal though, I will own a Showman.
— The Thunderchiefs
|
dp
Joined: Feb 26, 2006
Posts: 3546
mojave desert, california
|
Posted on Mar 15 2006 04:52 PM
krupanut
The Bassman (50watts) and Bandmaster(40watts) are just as good, they just don't have the head room that the Showman(80watts) has but who of us really needs all that power. I doubt any of us is booked at the Rendezvous Ballroom in the near future. So the Bassman and Bandmaster are great choices. One of these three is really the ultimate for the trad surf sound.
I am one who plays an old 1967 Silverface Fender Bassman 50. It's an absolutely great sounding amp, plenty of power for club gigs, and sounds great mic'ed at larger venues. My Bassman has been rehab-ed with new GE tubes and new capacitors and a few wires and such...still sounds warm fat and clean.
My cabinet is a 2x12 Celestion loaded rig that I built. i also have a 1967 Fender 4x12 cabinet...but, that's a little large for most gigs.
I resisted having my Siverface Bassman put through the "Blackface" modifications...the tone was simply pure strong and clean without the hassle of "Blackfacing" the circuit.
I am quite happy with the Silverface Fender....great sound at a reasonable price.
-dp
|
JakeDobner
Joined: Feb 26, 2006
Posts: 12159
Seattle
|
Posted on Mar 15 2006 05:03 PM
I, personally, am not a fan of my Showman for lead. For rhythm there is nothing else I would want. When playing lead it doesn't color my tone enough to even out tiny mistakes.
|
bigtikidude
Joined: Feb 27, 2006
Posts: 25569
Anaheim(So.Cal.)U.S.A.
|
Posted on Mar 15 2006 09:46 PM
What's more common with Showman cabs, Ported or sealed?
I guess I see more sealed cabs, and thought they were the norm, except for the tone ring ones of course.
Jeff(bigtikidude)
BillAqua
, but one main component to what makes the Showman sound so good is the ported cab.
— Jeff(bigtikidude)
|
Jon
Joined: Mar 15, 2006
Posts: 1076
Columbus, OH
|
Posted on Mar 16 2006 10:56 AM
Awesome guys. Thanks a lot for the input. I have one more question, though. What does 'ported' mean?
|
dp
Joined: Feb 26, 2006
Posts: 3546
mojave desert, california
|
Posted on Mar 16 2006 04:02 PM
Jon
Awesome guys. Thanks a lot for the input. I have one more question, though. What does 'ported' mean?
"Ported" refers to openings in the speaker cabinet: either round open "ports" on the front of the cabinet...or an "open-back" style speaker cabinet.
Most Showman speaker cabinets are closed-back...therefore, not "ported".
"Ported" and "Closed" designs effect the way the speaker cabinet sounds overall.
-dp
|
BillAqua
Joined: Feb 27, 2006
Posts: 1054
Chicago IL.
|
Posted on Mar 16 2006 05:43 PM
bigtikidude
What's more common with Showman cabs, Ported or sealed?
I guess I see more sealed cabs, and thought they were the norm, except for the tone ring ones of course.
Jeff(bigtikidude)
BillAqua
, but one main component to what makes the Showman sound so good is the ported cab.
I heard Eddie Bertrand had one of the first ported cabs....
— "as he stepped into the stealthy night air... little did he know the fire escape was not there"
https://www.facebook.com/reluctantaquanauts/
https://www.facebook.com/TheDragstripVipers/
|
Jon
Joined: Mar 15, 2006
Posts: 1076
Columbus, OH
|
Posted on Mar 16 2006 07:26 PM
dp
Jon
Awesome guys. Thanks a lot for the input. I have one more question, though. What does 'ported' mean?
"Ported" refers to openings in the speaker cabinet: either round open "ports" on the front of the cabinet...or an "open-back" style speaker cabinet.
Most Showman speaker cabinets are closed-back...therefore, not "ported".
"Ported" and "Closed" designs effect the way the speaker cabinet sounds overall.
-dp
Ah, I see! Thanks!
|
WR
Joined: Feb 27, 2006
Posts: 3832
netherlands
|
Posted on Mar 17 2006 03:53 AM
dp
Jon
Awesome guys. Thanks a lot for the input. I have one more question, though. What does 'ported' mean?
"Ported" refers to openings in the speaker cabinet: either round open "ports" on the front of the cabinet...or an "open-back" style speaker cabinet.
Most Showman speaker cabinets are closed-back...therefore, not "ported".
"Ported" and "Closed" designs effect the way the speaker cabinet sounds overall.
-dp
one main reason for me to prefer closed (sealed) cabs is this: with an open back or half open back, a lot of sound is coming through the back and via reflections - this makes the sound very dependent of positioning and what's behind the amp. I find it much easier to dial in the amp with a sealed cab than when I used an open back combo, less variation in setttings.
also, since more sound is coming from the speaker directly, It's easier to mic the amp ... with the open back I often suffered from a thin and high pitched sound through the PA - only later did IO ralize that that was probably because I got all my bass frequencies on stage via the back .... and the PA mic obviously didn't pick that up. btw, 'true' porting (front of the cab) is rather difficult to do yourself.
oh, and I completly echo DP's bassman sentiments!
WR
— Rules to live by #314:
"When in Italy, if the menu says something's grilled, don't assume it is."
https://www.facebook.com/The-Malbehavers-286429584796173/
|
Jon
Joined: Mar 15, 2006
Posts: 1076
Columbus, OH
|
Posted on Mar 17 2006 02:02 PM
Interesting. Thanks for the input, WR
|
unlunf
Joined: Feb 28, 2006
Posts: 106
The Vatican
|
Posted on Mar 17 2006 07:24 PM
Just a quickie note....
A closed back style cab is called an "infinite baffle" enclosure. The idea is that the front and back of the speaker is completely isolated, thus giving you the results that Wannes just noted. While there are no reflections off of the immediate back wall, the walls and the floor will still have some effect on the overall sound. Still, when you need volume, this is a better solution for obtaining your desired tone quickly (as in setting up in a hurry at a gig). I see musicians with this kind of cab messing around a lot less when they set up, they're just ready to go.
We used to call a port a tuned port, because it is tuned to give a certain frequency response out of an otherwise 'infinte baffle' enclosure. More or less, one can follow commonly found charts that will show you how to build a cab with a port that points in any direction, the usual being the front. All the theory aside, no matter which way the port exits the cab, the net result is noticibly more bass overall. Nearly all the benefit of a closed back, with even more bass.... what more could a guy ask for?
Which leads us to the partially closed back cabinet such as found in combo amps. These things have covers on the back for protective purposes only, and the openings between the covers are not tuned in any way. Therefore, they don't meet the definition of a port, or tuned port. Whatever is coming out of them is pretty much the same thing, frequency-wise, as what you hear out of the front. An old live-mic trick is to place the mic in the back of the cab, pointed away from the speaker. You can also place it just outside of the back, pointed in various ways until you find the best recording tones/levels.
If you want to check out some really freaky speaker cabinets, look up folded horns, particularly the old Fender Bassman 400 PS.
OK, I'm outta here, got an important show to catch!
unlunf
— MY RIGHT HAND IS FASTER THAN YOURS!
(copyright 2003, Bruce Welch)
|
Jon
Joined: Mar 15, 2006
Posts: 1076
Columbus, OH
|
Posted on Mar 18 2006 01:04 PM
I'll check that out. Thank you, sir.
|