Shoutbox

dp: dude
369 days ago

Bango_Rilla: Shout Bananas!!
324 days ago

BillyBlastOff: See you kiddies at the Convention!
308 days ago

GDW: showman
259 days ago

Emilien03: https://losg...
181 days ago

Pyronauts: Happy Tanks-Kicking!!!
175 days ago

glennmagi: CLAM SHACK guitar
160 days ago

Hothorseraddish: surf music is amazing
140 days ago

dp: get reverberated!
91 days ago

Clint: “A Day at the Beach” podcast #237 is TWO HOURS of NEW surf music releases. https://link...
24 days ago

Please login or register to shout.

IRC Status
  • racc

Join them in the #ShallowEnd!

Need help getting started?

Current Polls

No polls at this time. Check out our past polls.

Current Contests

No contests at this time. Check out our past contests.

Donations

Help us meet our monthly goal:

87%

87%

Donate Now

Cake May Birthdays Cake
SG101 Banner

SurfGuitar101 Forums » Gear »

Permalink SGV-300 Bigsby experiment

New Topic
Page 1 of 1

I had to try this, but, I was disappointed. My goal (dream) was to be able
to use 11 gauge strings and not have the trem arm pulled so tight as to be unusable.
The Bigsby makes 11 gauge strings possible but the tremolo sound it dead and
lifeless, you push down the arm and not much seems to happen. I tried to keep
the string length between the bridge and the front roller of the Bigsby the same as it was with
the original trem mechanism. I think it's that short length that is the problem.
I guess it's back to the drawing board and the original tremolo with 10 gauge strings.
image
In case you're interested I built a new tremolo plate from 1/8 thick steel.
It was easy to do, if you have a drillpress and a grinder.
The new plate attaches with the origianl screws and bridge and Bigsby bolt to
threaded holes in the plate. No new holes need to be drilled in the guitar.
image

That's a noble experiment, RecRoomSurfer. Looking at my own 300, I see it's about 4cm from the center of the bridge to the string attachment/rocker piece. Your pic gives the impression that the Bigsby roller is closer than that.

Can you redrill the mounting plate to get the trem assembly further back? I realize this would move the trem arm even further back (relative to stock) than it already is. If that's going to be an impediment, how about another Bigsby with more suitable proportions? Or you could fabricate a longer arm for the one you have now.

gee that looks great, a polished stainless steel plate would look even more. awesome

there's a rather simple mod for the original trem to take heavier strings. needed are two nails that fit into the trem post's holes that take the springs originally, one big ass thick nail, and a 60 watt or up solder iron. with a small pair of pliers, bend the small nails around the big one so that the small ones hold the big one, still stick out. put the small ones into the trem post' s holes so that the big nail becomes a bar between the two posts, and soleder it together at the posts. 10 minutes work. you can now use as many springs (standard fender size) as you want.

you'lll loose the smoothness of the tremsystem tho, which is a plus of the sgv imo. getting used to 010 strings would work better.

Rules to live by #314:
"When in Italy, if the menu says something's grilled, don't assume it is."

https://www.facebook.com/The-Malbehavers-286429584796173/

I used the same sort of method for my Reverend Club King 290 but I went with available commercial parts. My 290 had a standard stop tailpiece. The parts I ordered online were a roller bridge, Vibramate and a B5 Bigsby:

image
image

The Vibramate fits a lot of stock stop tailpieces and the Bigsby mounts on to it. Whole thing took me about 20 minutes to assemble. No muss, no fuss, and no holes to drill. And it works great.

http://www.vibramate.com/

The only real problem I had was finding a Bigsby B5 that was reasonably priced... Smile

Mel

You could try stringing up the bigsby without the roller bar; the string angle would be poor but you'd find out if the string angle/length with the roller bar is the problem.

Cool experiment, and excellent craftsmanship.

That Vibramate looks interesting. What's the distance from the stop tailpiece studs to the back edge? (I have my eye on a guitar with very little room between the stop tailpiece and the edge of the body.)

MelWaldorf
You could try stringing up the bigsby without the roller bar; the string angle would be poor but you'd find out if the string angle/length with the roller bar is the problem.

If you string it without the roller the strings are above the bridge.
So, to decrease the string angle I raised the front of the Bigsby.
Now the angle in more like with the original tremolo. This works better,
there is fuller range of tremolo effect.
I'll have to play it for a while to see if I like it.

p.s. I confess the Vibramate was my inspiration.

Original Tremolo
image

Bigsby mounted flat
image

Bigsby rasied at front
image

This post has been removed by the author.

Last edited: Sep 23, 2009 22:28:56

Dane_Brammage
That Vibramate looks interesting. What's the distance from the stop tailpiece studs to the back edge? (I have my eye on a guitar with very little room between the stop tailpiece and the edge of the body.)

As I measure it, it's pretty close to 3 3/8". When I started to put mine together I was a little surprised that it just dropped into place.

I was also surprised that it stays tune quite well.

Mel

Did you adjust the tension on the Bigsby coil spring? I've gotten a modern Bigsby to work with flatwound .011-.050 strings, but I had to adjust the nut that puts tension on the spring. I may have even added a washer, or removed one. It was a long time ago so I don't remember!

I have a Harmony with a Bigsby and it works great with flatwound .010's. The guitar is from 1965 so maybe the spring is meant to work with heavier strings.

By the way, your thick baseplate is a great idea. By raising the Bigsby, you are decreasing the angle the strings make as they pass under the roller, which reduces friction. Good luck with your project!

If it ain't broke, fix it until it is.

Page 1 of 1
Top