Photo of the Day
Shoutbox

dp: dude
350 days ago

Bango_Rilla: Shout Bananas!!
305 days ago

BillyBlastOff: See you kiddies at the Convention!
289 days ago

GDW: showman
240 days ago

Emilien03: https://losg...
162 days ago

Pyronauts: Happy Tanks-Kicking!!!
155 days ago

glennmagi: CLAM SHACK guitar
141 days ago

Hothorseraddish: surf music is amazing
120 days ago

dp: get reverberated!
71 days ago

Clint: “A Day at the Beach” podcast #237 is TWO HOURS of NEW surf music releases. https://link...
4 days ago

Please login or register to shout.

IRC Status
  • racc

Join them in the #ShallowEnd!

Need help getting started?

Current Polls

No polls at this time. Check out our past polls.

Current Contests

No contests at this time. Check out our past contests.

Donations

Help us meet our monthly goal:

0%

0%

Donate Now

Cake May Birthdays Cake
SG101 Banner

SurfGuitar101 Forums » Gear »

Permalink Deluxe Reverb options

New Topic
Goto Page: 1 2 3 Next

Wanted your opinions on amp choice for surf. I'm currently looking at the Fender Deluxe Reverb Series amps. Combination of price, weight, size, sound. My question is:

Which amp would be a better surf amp? VR '65 Deluxe Reverb with it's 12” Jensen® C-12K speaker? Or the '68 Custom Deluxe Reverb with it's 12” Celestion® G12V-70 speakers?

Hi,

I asked myself the same question 3 years ago.
I decided to go with a Super Reverb amp size.
Why? Because it has 45W. Compared to the 22W of the Deluxe it stays clean longer and has a stronger low end responde. Both you need for surf imho.
I do not regret my decision.
I used to play with lower wattage amps and experienced each time that they get dirty to soon and lack bass punch when hitting the low E string...

If you don´t like the big and heavy Super Reverb with it´s built in 4x10" speakers you can maybe try a bassman or bandmaster head with a dual 10" or 12" cabinet or a single 15"

just my 2ct
LoeD

here comes the WEST SAMOA SURFER LEAGUE

@GuitarMuk I've tried both the '65 Deluxe Reverb Reissue and the '68 Deluxe Reverb Reissue. The '65 reissue sounded better to me (more clarity, better note definition and in the ball park of an original). The '68 to me is not true to an original '68 it's more of a custom amp with modern features - the '68 to me had too much bass/low end, wasn't as clear in the top end and distorted (broke up) faster than the 65. Do you have an opportunity to bring your guitar and try both? My answer would be the '65 reissue for surf. Buy an amp to match your needs (e.g. the average venue you play in if you gig) If you're a bedroom player check out the '65 Princeton Reissue.

On a side note, I have an early 70's Super Reverb and I love it, that being said I'm looking at a 65 Deluxe Reverb reissue as a better amp to fit the venues / clubs I play in. Plus my band volume is not too loud.

It does depend on the playing situation you're using it in but a Deluxe Reverb can be a great sounding amp for surf. If you want portability and Fender tone at lower volume levels it's an excellent choice...in which case I'd say go with the '65 Reissue. Obviously, it's not a closed cabinet and not as much power (as a Super, Bassman, Showman, etc) and therefore some guys might say it's not a true "surf amp". If you're playing loud clubs, outdoor gigs, and / or your band relies on maximum sound pressure levels as part of the show then it's probably not a good choice and you will need a bigger rig.

In Superwave, Rick and I use both use vintage Deluxe Reverbs for rehearsals and smaller gigs and it's probably my favorite go-to amp.
image
image

Last edited: Jul 14, 2015 11:18:20

Thanks for the responses. I love talking gear!

LoeD--I will take your 2cts into consideration. I've considered the Super Reverb, believe me. But 23 pounds heavier & $500 more, yikes. Plus with my back (and lack of roadies) the weight alone may be a deal breaker.

Derekirving and Ben--yea, sounds like the '65 is the way to go. I was wondering which would break up faster and sounds like it's the '68.
I suppose switching out speakers to one that doesn't break up as fast would help, but it would mean extra bucks into a new amp, ugh.

Waht about the '68 Custom Vibrolux? 35 watts, only 41 pounds, and only $100 more? But those 2 10's......I don't know if that would work for surf.

2x10s with 35watts would work better for surf than 22watts with a 1x12. 2x10s move more air than a 1x12.

Super Reverbs are really heavy, I hate moving them by the hand. I usually lift with two hands, bear hug style, and it is incredibly easier. But... amazing amps. The 4x10s are perfect for surf/playing live.

JakeDobner wrote:

2x10s with 35watts would work better for surf than 22watts with a 1x12. 2x10s move more air than a 1x12.

Super Reverbs are really heavy, I hate moving them by the hand. I usually lift with two hands, bear hug style, and it is incredibly easier. But... amazing amps. The 4x10s are perfect for surf/playing live.

Thanks Jake. The only thing I wonder about is that I've read that the Vibrolux is made to break up sooner, based on more modern sounds. So I wonder if it would stay clean long enough. You'd think it would with 35 watts though.

The 68 Vibrolux does breakup earlier than a 65 reissue due to Celestion speakers and circuitry in the 68 vibrolux silverface. 22 watts vs 35 watts is only a few db (decibels) different. The 65 deluxe can hang using an efficient speaker. The stock Jensen C12K is 99 dbl where as an Emminence Swampthang is 102 dbl - that's quite a difference.

The question is (1) if playing live what's the venue/club size normally and (2) how loud is your drummer/band? BTW stage/club volumes have come down quite a bit. I've never played anywhere where they said to TURN UP Smile

I havent played one seriously, but I believe there is a normal and a 'hot rod' circuit in the '68 series amps. One is a traditional circuit and the other breaks up easily.

For a smaller indoor, unmic'ed situation, a 2x10 '68 Custom Vibrolux Reverb would likely need to be turned up to 3.5. About 4.5~5 is where that warm grit is starting to be part of the tone. At that point, you are likely causing ringing ears anywhere within 15'-20' in front of it.
Unless it was going to be mic'ed, a Dlx Reverb ('65 or '68) would not be my first choice as a smaller surf amp.
If playing outdoors, unmic'ed, honestly, I think for combos that a Super Rvb or a Twin would be the way to go. I have not yet used my 68 Vibrolux for an unmic'ed outdoor gig. I think it would start pushing that headroom point at that volume.

Lorne
The Surf Shakers: https://www.facebook.com/TheSurfShakers
Vancouver BC Canada

I was in this exact situation a few months ago. I went with the '65 Deluxe RI, and couldn't be happier with my decision. It also didn't hurt that I had a blonde custom cabinet made for it. I posted pics of it in the Beaver Bottoms thread. Go with the '65!

MooreLoud.com - A tribute to Dick Dale. New EP Louder Than Life available on bandcamp and website.

JakeDobner wrote:

I havent played one seriously, but I believe there is a normal and a 'hot rod' circuit in the '68 series amps. One is a traditional circuit and the other breaks up easily.

I have the 68 CVR & love it. The circuits aren't really hot-rodded. One channel ("Vintage") should really be called "classic BF tone-stack Princeton-on-steroids". The other Custom channel should be called Bandmaster or Bassman tone stack. I knew I was going to ditch the Celestions when buying it and got from my shop a new pair of reissue Jensens instead which are quite adequate. I use the Custom channel more than the classic scooped-mids BF sound by a ratio of about 8:1. It gets much better low-end response and you can get some 'girth' out of it.

It gets seriously loud above 4; fine trem and a big reverb pan in it (usually use my tank though).

Wes
SoCal ex-pat with a snow shovel

DISCLAIMER: The above is opinion/suggestion only & should not be used for mission planning/navigation, tweaking of instruments, beverage selection, or wardrobe choices.

A damn good review! That sounds really promising, I would like to get one for a steal someday.

Yea, thanks Badger! Interesting. I probably won't be able to purchase this amp for a few months, so I've got some time and a lot of thinking to do!!

JakeDobner wrote:

A damn good review! That sounds really promising, I would like to get one for a steal someday.

Seriously a repop set of Jensens or some other flavor of decent speaker. The bass response on the Celestions they put in it is just criminal. The decision by them to put Celestions in it had me looking for Nurse Ratched... Picard Face Palm One of those things where I just knew it could do better & my amp guy had a little cab we tried out for listening so swap/swap & life was good. It's kind of a 'mama-bear' just-right size for me.

They are not that much more than a new DRRI and I saw one used/mint for $850 (a shop regular who buys new stuff, brings it back a month later & saves everyone else some money, he's held in high regard).

Wes
SoCal ex-pat with a snow shovel

DISCLAIMER: The above is opinion/suggestion only & should not be used for mission planning/navigation, tweaking of instruments, beverage selection, or wardrobe choices.

@Badger I tried the 68 Deluxe Reverb (w/Celestions) and on the bassman side the bass was overwhelming/boomy so I wrote the amp off on the spot. So sounds like you're liking Jensen's in your 68 vibrolux(?) What was your experience with the bass on that one with Celestions?

I've used my 68 Vibrolux for about 5 gigs and about 15 performance-volume practices - stock.
While I can see how a speaker upgrade would be sweet, the Celestions are far from being horrible or unusable. I wouldn't have purchased the thing if it sounded horrible in the shop. At this point, I am in no rush to replace the Celestions because, if I did, it would simply be on faith from something that I read here saying that the Jensons were a remarkable upgrade - not because my ear tells be that the Celestions were horrible.
I use the Custom side of my 68 CVR with the bass being about 8.5 and the treble about 6-ish. Boomy? What does that actually mean? ...that the bass starts farting out and you get cabinet howl? I have heard of that on the CDR at very pushed volumes but that simply does not happen on my CVR at gig volumes.

Lorne
The Surf Shakers: https://www.facebook.com/TheSurfShakers
Vancouver BC Canada

derekirving wrote:

@Badger I tried the 68 Deluxe Reverb (w/Celestions) and on the bassman side the bass was overwhelming/boomy so I wrote the amp off on the spot. So sounds like you're liking Jensen's in your 68 vibrolux(?) What was your experience with the bass on that one with Celestions?

The only thing that kept drawing me to the CVR was the total package, bang for the buck. I initially thought, and still do, the Celestions were the wrong speaker in that amp. I thought they were extremely shallow in terms of bass response, no firm drive, just yuck, and they couldn't react to what the tonestack was intended to do. Which is doubly disappointing, because you still want good punchy bass response on the so-called Vintage channel, with its scoopy-mids Princeton-like sound (and it is lovely for that kind of thing). I kept going back to the amp though & hauled it into the shop's "drum room" so I could really turn it up & it was just louder disappointment. My amp guy had a little cab with a couple of Jensen JET series 10's in it (who knows why) and it was like, suddenly, what the amp should've been. So he had another pair NIB and we swapped. I'm sure any decent speaker (Eminence, WGS) could help it because the Celestion model that was in it should've been (maybe) in a Marshall bedroom amp.

My plugged nickel on the 2 smaller amps below in those 2 "series" is that for the Deluxe and the Princeton size, the "BF" DRRI & PRRI are much better than their 'Custom' Silverface counterparts. That's just to my ear. Might be the difference in the warmth & punch one actually gets from a pair of 6L6's in my CVR vs. the smaller tubes, might be the speaker choice.

For those who pick nits, they did a nice job with the drip-edge on the CVR too. Big Grin

Edit to add, seeing shake_n_stomp's reply: That's cool it works for you. Maybe it was just the ones in my amp. We all hear different stuff.
And, FTR, I don't think the Jensens are remarkable; just a notable improvement in my amp. Again, everyone's ear is different and the Jensens were what was handy, like, right there.
Smile

Wes
SoCal ex-pat with a snow shovel

DISCLAIMER: The above is opinion/suggestion only & should not be used for mission planning/navigation, tweaking of instruments, beverage selection, or wardrobe choices.

Last edited: Jul 14, 2015 17:27:23

At the risk of sounding trollish, why does it have to be a NEW amp? Many suitable used Fender & Music Man, even Traynor amps can be had for a lot less than $850.

Squink Out!

Last edited: Jul 14, 2015 17:54:21

I think the 6L6 (Vibrolux) is a much better tube for traditional Surf as it's defined around here and this coming from a guy who has played mostly 6V6's (Deluxe and Princeton) the last ten years.
That being said - I don't care for 2x10's much. When playing through 10's I much prefer the 4x10 Super Reverb.
I don't know if any of that helps your search, especially since I'd be perfectly happy with a Deluxe Reverb - unless I had to play onstage along with you Showman guys, LOL

Cheers,
Jeff

http://www.facebook.com/CrazyAcesMusic
http://www.youtube.com/user/crazyacesrock
http://www.reverbnation.com/crazyacesmusic

Goto Page: 1 2 3 Next
Top