Bong-O
Joined: Mar 04, 2006
Posts: 139
Massachusetts, birthplace of Dick Dale
|

Posted on Feb 08 2008 09:33 AM
I have a Showman that I use for any gig I can - it is the amp of choice for me. For smaller gigs, I have a Vibrolux and although I have done everything I can to it to achieve more headroom, it breaks up too early for me. I also have a blackface BandMaster and I am thinking about making a combo out of it for small gigs. Get a Vibroclone 1 15" cab and slide the chassis of the Bandmaster in...... Has anyone done this with success? Should I go for a 15" (I love that about my Showman) or a 1 12", maybe with a tone ring? Also, should I have an open back combo or a closed back, I know I could get it either way...... I am thinking Newell amps..... any other cabinet builders anyone can suggest? Thanks in advance for the info......
|
JakeDobner
Joined: Feb 26, 2006
Posts: 12159
Seattle
|

Posted on Feb 08 2008 09:55 AM
I wouldn't make a combo of the bandmaster. I find a bandmaster cab and head easier to carry than a combo.
Also, I'd go 2x12 not 1x15. To me, the 15 is the Showman's thing.
Also, is it a modern vibrolux? Those are known for breaking up on 2-3. They are nothing like the true Vibrolux.
|
WoodyJ
Joined: Apr 05, 2006
Posts: 1547
Bethlehem, GA
|

Posted on Feb 08 2008 09:56 AM
Bong-O,
I have a similar setup, that started out as a '65 Bandmaster chassis in a Larry Rodgers Vibrolux clone cabinet (2-10's). I replaced the BM chassis with a '67 Dual Showman to get a little more clean headroom and swapped the tired old speakers that were in it with a pair of Weber Californias. Here's a picture:
To answer your question, yes, it should work out great. The Bandmaster will be plenty loud...actually the Showman in mine isn't all that much louder than the Bandmaster was at a given volume setting until you really crank it. Just make sure your speaker impedence is matched to the Bandmaster chassis. I think the single 15" combo cab with an open back would be a good choice for a nice, portable combo surf rig that would work fine in all but the larger venues.
A tone ring setup requires a special ported closed back cabinet with a double baffle. I guess it depends if you want a combo or a piggyback.
With all that said, maybe a simple speaker change in your Vibrolux would solve your problem. That would be way less expensive than getting a combo cabinet built! A pair of EVM's, Weber Calis, or JBL D110's should work wonders. Also a quality set of tubes will help clean things up.
Hope this helps!
— Jack Booth
(aka WoodyJ)
The Mariners (1964-68, 1996-2005), 2025
The Hula Hounds (1996-2000)
The X-Rays (1997-2004)
The Surge! (2004, 2011-2012)
Various non-surf bands that actually made money (1978-1990)
Last edited: Feb 08, 2008 13:57:06
|
PhatTele
Joined: Jun 05, 2006
Posts: 445
|

Posted on Feb 08 2008 10:08 AM
I think Bandmasters make great combos. I have mine in a 2x10 (Weber 10F150 and 10F150P 50 watters) and a friend of mine uses his in a 1x12 with a Vintage 30 clone and a multitap Bassman output transformer.
As far as cabinet builders go, Newell cabs are okay, but I was pretty dissatisfied with the ones I've come across. I ended up selling three of them to get a better quality cabs. It's the little details that he seems to miss. Instead, I'd go with Crusty Cabs or TruTone Cabs. Both of these guys make really high quality stuff:.
www.webervst.com/crusty.htm
www.trutonecustom.com
Or MojoTone...probably the best.
www.mojotone.com
|
eddiekatcher
Joined: Mar 14, 2006
Posts: 2778
Atlanta, GA
|

Posted on Feb 08 2008 10:13 AM
Try plugging into input #2 on your Vibrolux, it has less gain. I use input #2 with the Hallmark guitar because of its high pickup output...If you go the 1-1-15 combo route, which I think is a great idea, you might also consider a Peavy 1504 steel guitar speaker it has a 4 ohm coil and a chrome dust cover and it like all Peavy speakers is indestructible.I have one in my tone ring cabinet and it is awesome. Almost as good as the EV-15L's I love so much.......ed
— Traditional........speak softly and play through a big blonde amp. Did I mention that I still like big blonde amps?
|
Sonichris
Joined: Mar 06, 2006
Posts: 1911
Wear gloves - I'm in the Rockies
|

Posted on Feb 08 2008 10:28 AM
Hey Bongo - are you thinking of the combo because of space limitations of certain gigs? Or volume limitations?
— "You can't tell where you're going if you don't know where you've been"
|
Bong-O
Joined: Mar 04, 2006
Posts: 139
Massachusetts, birthplace of Dick Dale
|

Posted on Feb 08 2008 11:31 AM
Thanks for the input, everyone.
I need a combo for gigs where space is limited and quick set up / breakdown is nessesary. I use and prefer the Showman when ever possible, but there are times when I need a smaller combo. But I want clearity and definition with the low end.... I don't want breakup!
First, about the Vibrolux: 1974, I was hoping the silverface "beefed up" transformer would be to my advantage. I've tried Weber Cali Alnico speakers, but now have 75 watt Eminance Ceramics in it to try to achieve more headroom. I put in a solid state rectifier and switched the pre amp tube from an AX7 to an AT7..... but i still get muddy low end above 5.
I have a complete 1965 Bandmaster piggyback set up, but it is as involved a set up as the Showman (as you all are aware). So I was thinking if I threw the chassis into a 1 15" combo it might work out nicely..... An amp tech told me I'd get more headroom out of the Bandmaster because of a beefier transformer and solid state rectifier, but that is what I have basiclly done to the Vibrolux..... would I really get more out of a bandmaster combo?
|
PhatTele
Joined: Jun 05, 2006
Posts: 445
|

Posted on Feb 08 2008 12:02 PM
Yes. Compared to the Vibrolux, the Bandmaster has tighter filtering (which includes a bigger choke), a beefier power transformer (it's like a Bassman), and a solid state rectifier. All that together equals more headroom than the Vibrolux. However, because the output transformer is smaller, the Bandmaster will not have as much headroom when compared to something like a Bassman. If headroom and portability are the main issues, then a Bandmaster combo with a Bassman output transformer is the way to go. In fact, the mounting holes are already drilled.
|
eddiekatcher
Joined: Mar 14, 2006
Posts: 2778
Atlanta, GA
|

Posted on Feb 08 2008 02:06 PM
If you don't care that it doesn't look exactly kosher, ponder putting the Bandmaster chassis in a 2-12 vertical array cabinet with possibly one enclosed speaker and one open back speaker. Leave the top rear open and you could quickly swap the Bandmaster chassis out for the Showman chassis for even larger venues. The top speaker being open would give good stage presence and the closed back lower speaker would couple acoustically to the floor and increase the apparent bottom end. This woud also put the knobs in easy reach. Wack off the rear bottom of the cabinet at a 45 degree angle add two non-swivel casters and bingo, instant handtruck amp assembly. I've had this basic idea kicking around for some time, I just haven't gotten to the part about the sawdust.
Oh, and NO Mesa engineering did NOT think of this type of open/closed speaker first.......
ed
— Traditional........speak softly and play through a big blonde amp. Did I mention that I still like big blonde amps?
|
Bong-O
Joined: Mar 04, 2006
Posts: 139
Massachusetts, birthplace of Dick Dale
|

Posted on Feb 08 2008 03:10 PM
That is a great idea, Eddie. I have a few coulda, woulda, shoulda's myself. I like the quick swap chassis concept. Unfortunately, looks do matter to me..... I am a vintage, purist buff and would try to have a vintage look with this combo. If I have one built, it will be blonde with wheat (nice Woody!) ala 1964 early blackface, Tilt backs and an old Fender amp badge so it would kinda look like an old Vibroverb, maybe? Also, PhatTele, as nice as a Bassman OT in it would be, swapping the OT would be too much for me. My Bandmaster is very clean and I want to do as little to it as I need to over the years..... I may need to sell it to eat someday!
|
MelWaldorf
Joined: Mar 03, 2006
Posts: 648
|

Posted on Feb 08 2008 03:27 PM
Bong-o,
Have you tried the Vibrolux with a 15"? If you've got enough volume but low end clarity is the problem, the 15 might solve your problem. I found that my Twin Reverb couldn't hold the low end either, and swapping a 15 made the difference.
Also, I used to have a '74 Bandmaster Reverb in a 1x15" combo and it had plenty of low end.
Mel
|
eddiekatcher
Joined: Mar 14, 2006
Posts: 2778
Atlanta, GA
|

Posted on Feb 08 2008 03:35 PM
My original design for this concept amp was around 1973. I had a Dual Showman head that I "boogied" and played it through a slant Marshall cab rewired 4 ohms. I thought the cool idea would be a super tall Fender style cab which would sort of look like a Super Six Reverb but with a 15 in the bottom closed up, an open 12 and a Goodman's horn and crossover from a Vox Super Beatle amp that could be activated through a foot switch for all the British based stuff we were playing at the time. I got the idea for the casters from the old Acoustic 360 bass amp cab. I still think it's a kick ass idea. Maybe the next rainy weeked, I'll saw up some wood......ed
— Traditional........speak softly and play through a big blonde amp. Did I mention that I still like big blonde amps?
|
Bong-O
Joined: Mar 04, 2006
Posts: 139
Massachusetts, birthplace of Dick Dale
|

Posted on Feb 09 2008 07:42 PM
One last question:
I want the most headroom I can get, but still want to retain a nice vintage Fender sound.....
Should I get a Weber Cali ceramic 15" (80 watts)
or a Weber Michigan ceramic 15" (100 watts)
?????????
|
WoodyJ
Joined: Apr 05, 2006
Posts: 1547
Bethlehem, GA
|

Posted on Feb 09 2008 10:29 PM
I have a 15" California ceramic in my 100W Custom Vibrasonic, and it is about as clean as it gets. The Cali is Weber's interpretation of a JBL D130F, and I love the way they sound...loud, crisp, and clean, no caffeine. I have Calis in three of my Fender amps - 10, 12 and 15" versions. The 12 in my Deluxe Reverb is an alnico, though.
IMO the best "clean" 15" speaker out there is probably an Electro-Voice EVM or EV15L, but they are $$$ and hard to find. They are darn near indestructible, though. But considering bang for the buck, Ted Weber's stuff is hard to beat. He indicates on his site that the ceramics have more headroom than the alnicos.
Caveat: Speakers, like guitars, amps, tubes, picks, etc., are a very subjective thing.
I don't have any experience with the Weber Michigan...maybe someone else can lend an opinion...
— Jack Booth
(aka WoodyJ)
The Mariners (1964-68, 1996-2005), 2025
The Hula Hounds (1996-2000)
The X-Rays (1997-2004)
The Surge! (2004, 2011-2012)
Various non-surf bands that actually made money (1978-1990)
|
SURFmole
Joined: Nov 22, 2007
Posts: 901
Portland, OR
|

Posted on Feb 10 2008 11:45 PM
Bong-O
I want the most headroom I can get, but still want to retain a nice vintage Fender sound.....
Isn't that statement mutually exclusive? I always thought a key ingredient of the 'nice vintage Fender sound' was a little bit of speaker breakup or tone coloration?
I would think that using a speaker with the most headroom possible (no distortion or tone shaping whatsoever) would make for a very clinical uninteresting tone...???
If speaker breakup is a concern I'd also think you'd definitely want a closed back cabinet for a tighter and more controlled sound with more power handling.
— www.apollo4.com
|
Boulder_Bob
Joined: Mar 29, 2006
Posts: 132
|

Posted on Feb 12 2008 07:18 AM
nobody has mentioned Weber's NeoMag - I have one these, in 12" form, and it sounds just like a JBL to me - and it weighs 8 lbs.
great choice for a surf combo, IMHO
|