diceophonic
Joined: May 20, 2006
Posts: 2174
PacNW (Vancouver, Wa U.S.A.)
|

Posted on Sep 27 2007 11:05 AM
I came acorss this interesting small article on my search on Ebay's "Reviews & Guides" on Fender guitars of Japan, check it out for those that have that itchin' question of "Made Vs Crafted" this might answer your question, I know most of us know but some other's might not
and this artical is short and sweet to the point.
"MADE In Japan" vs "CRAFTED In Japan" Fender Guitar(s)
— -Kyle
Beyond The Surf YouTube channel
Beyond The Surf Instagram
The Verbtones @ Instagram
The Verbtones @ Facebook
The Verbtones @ bandcamp
|
ShaunNecro
Joined: Mar 06, 2007
Posts: 524
Bay City (Michigan)
|

Posted on Sep 27 2007 10:24 PM
I kinda knew that, but still interesting.
— I am super sweet
www.myspace.com/thetremblors
|
Spud
Joined: Jul 23, 2007
Posts: 666
Oz
|

Posted on Sep 27 2007 11:07 PM
Made In Japan = older... Crafted In Japan = newer
It's just a matter of time. It's that simple.
Well there ya have it in black and white, cool.
|
surfrkr
Joined: Aug 24, 2007
Posts: 3
|

Posted on Sep 28 2007 12:34 AM
So the MIJ, made "for sale" in the US and the CIJ, made "for sale" only in the orient was less than factual. But then aren't the electronics between the two different? The CIJ's supposedly having a higher grade of electronics?
|
JakeDobner
Joined: Feb 26, 2006
Posts: 12159
Seattle
|

Posted on Sep 28 2007 01:20 AM
I'm not saying he is right or wrong as I don't know the answer but this guy offers no proof to what he is saying. Mostly he sounds like an ass sticking his opinion to someone else(kinda of like I do sometimes without realizing it).
This is bad history on his behalf. He looked at the dates and assumed the the only difference was the years produced. Yes, MIJ equals older, and CIJ equals newer. But the huge questions about quality isn't answered. He didn't test the woods, the electronics, or finish. I've heard rumors that they may have been produced at different factories.
I've owned 3 Japanese Jags and the more recent ones are the best, although I hear that the very early ones might just be the best.
Whether this transition in quality happens between MIJ and CIJ I do not know. Was it merely a name change or was it a complete organizational new. New plant producing the guitars or something else. After all Fender merely licenses the guitars in Japan, they don't build them.
|
WR
Joined: Feb 27, 2006
Posts: 3832
netherlands
|

Posted on Sep 28 2007 03:09 AM
JakeDobner
Whether this transition in quality happens between MIJ and CIJ I do not know. Was it merely a name change or was it a complete organizational new. New plant producing the guitars or something else. After all Fender merely licenses the guitars in Japan, they don't build them.
Ive always understood it was "just a namechange" too, but I think Jake is making some excellent points. there's the change from basswood to alder for the bodies. I dont know either whether that coincides with the namechange. then there's the made for jap market only guitars, which I dont know much about except I got my jag straight from japan, private seller though. dont know if it's jap market or not. the dat for the name change seems to early for me, from what Ive seen in stores and online sales, but of course you cant tell cause there can be years between production date and retail date.
Also, even if they were the same, I would assume that the surplus paint on the neck of "crafted" instead of "made" would make for a top heavy neck and a darker tone. 
— Rules to live by #314:
"When in Italy, if the menu says something's grilled, don't assume it is."
https://www.facebook.com/The-Malbehavers-286429584796173/
|
Klas
Joined: Feb 26, 2006
Posts: 2310
Stockholm, Sweden
|

Posted on Sep 28 2007 03:37 AM
WR
then there's the made for jap market only guitars, which I dont know much about except I got my jag straight from japan, private seller though.
I've heard that these are also retailed in Europe while the U.S. retailers got lower quality instruments from Japan. Would make sense that Fender didn't want too much competition for their domestic manufactured guitars on the home market.
— T H E ✠ S U R F I T E S
|
Richard
Joined: Mar 02, 2006
Posts: 1683
Georgia
|

Posted on Sep 28 2007 07:14 AM
My Jazzmaster is "Made in Japan" and I've handled a few of the later model "Crafted in Japan" ones and didn't notice a whole heck of a lot of difference. My guitar is also a '95 model, so it's got over a decade of age and wear on it. If the "Made in's" are lower quality, the used prices and opinions of most users don't reflect it from what I've seen. I tried like hell to score a second MIJ Jazzmaster or Jaguar on eBay for $500 or less and simply couldn't do it. I consistently watched them go for what they can be purchased new.
— The Mystery Men?
El Capitan and The Reluctant Sadists
SSS Agent #31
|
Brian
Joined: Feb 25, 2006
Posts: 19345
Des Moines, Iowa, USA
|

Posted on Sep 28 2007 08:30 AM
What that guy wrote was basically the consensus on the Fender Forum a few years ago. But yeah, he is just parotting what he heard there without anything to back it up. It's like they just wanted to change the serial number scheme so they arbitarily switched from MIJ to CIJ.
— Site dude - S3 Agent #202
Need help with the site? SG101 FAQ - Send me a private message - Email me
"It starts... when it begins" -- Ralf Kilauea
|
drumuitar
Joined: Feb 28, 2006
Posts: 813
Boise, ID
|

Posted on Sep 28 2007 08:55 AM
Brian
What that guy wrote was basically the consensus on the Fender Forum a few years ago..
We "know" that those people on the Fender Forum are "the" experts on all things Fender, so I'd say this subject is closed (he says with a slight amount of sarcasm 
— Shawn Martin
http://www.drummerman.net
http://www.youtube.com/GKacedrummerman
http://www.facebook.com/drumuitar
|
Stormtiger
Joined: Dec 12, 2006
Posts: 2688
Ventura, CA
|

Posted on Sep 28 2007 11:16 AM
I recently photographed my early MIJ pots to find out if, as I had heard, early MIJ used surplus USA parts. I showed someone who has owned many Japanese Jaguars and he said they are Japanese pots but larger than the pots in newer models. Has anyone else seen this difference? I compared it with an AVRI Jaguar and it held up very well in all aspects. I did put on a USA bridge on the advice of Dave Wronski.
|
WR
Joined: Feb 27, 2006
Posts: 3832
netherlands
|

Posted on Sep 28 2007 12:09 PM
Stormtiger
I recently photographed my early MIJ pots to find out if, as I had heard, early MIJ used surplus USA parts. I showed someone who has owned many Japanese Jaguars and he said they are Japanese pots but larger than the pots in newer models. Has anyone else seen this difference? I compared it with an AVRI Jaguar and it held up very well in all aspects. I did put on a USA bridge on the advice of Dave Wronski.
I know my jag is from post 2K, if i remeber correctly '02, took the neck off only once. anyway, the pots are so small they couldnt be any smaller or they'd slip through the hole in the pickguard - there's giant mofo pots in there now. the wiring seems pretty shabby too, but all in all I have no complaints about this guitar. RE: the bridge: nothing an ounce of lock-tite wont fix! 
— Rules to live by #314:
"When in Italy, if the menu says something's grilled, don't assume it is."
https://www.facebook.com/The-Malbehavers-286429584796173/
|
dp
Joined: Feb 26, 2006
Posts: 3546
mojave desert, california
|

Posted on Sep 28 2007 12:21 PM
My 2001 CIJ '51 Precision Bass had little tiny skinny wiring and tiny little pots (and tiny routs, too)...but, the quality of the woods, finish and hardware all seem top notch.
|
RumorsofsurF
Joined: Mar 10, 2007
Posts: 286
Margaritaville, OR
|

Posted on Oct 02 2007 11:21 PM
My 2003 CIJ Jag has Novak pickups, but stock wiring, pots. They are cheapos, but they work fine.
My newer CIJ Bigsby Tele has cheap wiring, pots, and pickups. I had to swap the neck pickup for an MIM one, due to microphonic feedback.:puke:
I plan to install Nocasters and all new electronics.
|
dimxl
Joined: Mar 04, 2006
Posts: 25
Moscow
|

Posted on Oct 04 2007 05:32 AM
Its correct information about MIJ & CIJ -
http://www.fender.com/support/japanese_instruments.php
The switch from MIJ to CIJ happened in 1997, with early '97 models saying MIJ and later '97 models saying CIJ
|
WR
Joined: Feb 27, 2006
Posts: 3832
netherlands
|

Posted on Oct 04 2007 06:19 AM
that doesnt say anything about whether or not changes in design were made at the same time. it's also a bit puzzling since I have a P+6 digits CIJ from '02, granted, the first digit is a 0
— Rules to live by #314:
"When in Italy, if the menu says something's grilled, don't assume it is."
https://www.facebook.com/The-Malbehavers-286429584796173/
|
eddiekatcher
Joined: Mar 14, 2006
Posts: 2778
Atlanta, GA
|

Posted on Oct 04 2007 10:18 AM
I've owned several of both. I frankly couldn't tell much if any difference. Both had rather cheezy pickups and switches and the Tremolo isn't quite up to an American one. Both bridges had uniform and small string grooves but that was just about it. I have noticed that the newer ones from Japan had fatter necks which I personally don't care for. Both my current MIJ Sunburst and Richard's MIJ Olympic white one have THE neck on them. Easily as good if not better that the AVRI's that I normally use.....ed
— Traditional........speak softly and play through a big blonde amp. Did I mention that I still like big blonde amps?
|
estreet
Joined: Mar 17, 2007
Posts: 839
United Kingdom
|

Posted on Oct 04 2007 01:38 PM
dimxl
Its correct information about MIJ & CIJ -
http://www.fender.com/support/japanese_instruments.php
The switch from MIJ to CIJ happened in 1997, with early '97 models saying MIJ and later '97 models saying CIJ
...But I have a Jag that is B+6 digits - and a CIJ. That doesn't exist in this guide.........
— http://www.myspace.com/thepashuns
Youth and enthusiasm are no match for age and treachery.
|
eddiekatcher
Joined: Mar 14, 2006
Posts: 2778
Atlanta, GA
|

Posted on Oct 04 2007 01:43 PM
Somebody out there playing "swap the neck plate"? I have no idea what the serial numbers of my MIJ and CIJ guitars were.....ed
— Traditional........speak softly and play through a big blonde amp. Did I mention that I still like big blonde amps?
|
WR
Joined: Feb 27, 2006
Posts: 3832
netherlands
|

Posted on Oct 04 2007 02:33 PM
on my CIJ the serial number is on the heel of the neck, not on the neckplate... I agree about the electronics including the pups. mediocre. the switches hold up so they stayed in, I changed the pots and the pups though. I really like the neck, it's a bit fatter than a current AVRI that's in my guitarcentre right ow. I actually prefer my CIJ as far as playability goes, but that might be cause Im used to it. the big change imo is that they seemed to have switched form basswood to alder for the bodies at one point, or so I heard.
OT interesting tidbit, I was at the guitarplace today, and they had a brand new white CIJ jag. the also had a white AVRI jag. the whites were totally different and the CIJ was the ugliest white Ive ever seen on a guitar. not sure what it was supposed to be but it sure wasnt. other interesting thing is that on the lower bout (that's what it's called right?) the rounding of the edge of the body was completly off - actually it wasnt rounded, but more triangled, almost a straight angled edge. YUK, I spotted it form 10 metres away, that's how obvious it was. made me wonder if the use computer-cutting machines in the factory and if so, does it run on windows? ... I told the guy from the store and he said, "well, it's unique! Im not gonna give discount for that" I said I wouldnt want the gutar even with a discount.
— Rules to live by #314:
"When in Italy, if the menu says something's grilled, don't assume it is."
https://www.facebook.com/The-Malbehavers-286429584796173/
|