Photo of the Day
Shoutbox

sysmalakian: TODAY IS MY BIRTHDAY!
361 days ago

dp: dude
342 days ago

Bango_Rilla: Shout Bananas!!
297 days ago

BillyBlastOff: See you kiddies at the Convention!
281 days ago

GDW: showman
232 days ago

Emilien03: https://losg...
154 days ago

Pyronauts: Happy Tanks-Kicking!!!
147 days ago

glennmagi: CLAM SHACK guitar
133 days ago

Hothorseraddish: surf music is amazing
113 days ago

dp: get reverberated!
63 days ago

Please login or register to shout.

IRC Status
  • racc

Join them in the #ShallowEnd!

Need help getting started?

Current Polls

No polls at this time. Check out our past polls.

Current Contests

No contests at this time. Check out our past contests.

Donations

Help us meet our monthly goal:

35%

35%

Donate Now

Cake April Birthdays Cake
SG101 Banner

SurfGuitar101 Forums » For Sale / Trade »

Permalink Hellige lort, look at this price...

New Topic
Goto Page: Previous 1 2 3 Next

As a proud owner of a modded Squier VI, which I think has the best fun for bucks ratio on the planet, who's to say that this '62 is even gonna be purchased for playing?
It's an investment, like any item of the huge market for antiques and vintage instrument. Better than gold or stocks IMHO for the long term - these things are one of a kind, from a specific era and hold an epic romanticism around them. Plenty of people appreciate that, thus the value.

But the thing about this trend of buying guitars as investments all depends on the nostalgia/romanticism attached to it all. There's a certain generation of people who now have a lot of disposable income and are inclined to buy these instruments based on that and the assumption that prices will always go up.

But that will not always be so. As musical tastes and trends change, fewer people will be infatuated with many models, and values will fade unless someone else comes along and makes a splash playing a certain one. Jack White did so for resoglass guitars and Silvertone amps, Kurt Cobain did so for Jaguars and Mustangs.

So I say the same thing about buying a house as I do for guitars - buy it to use, not an investment. People who buy such things and never use them are taking a risk, and can probably afford to do so. I'm not in their league and not going to play their game, but I'm happy to watch from the sidelines and to go visit open houses and play expensive guitars when I'm allowed.

edwardsand wrote:

But the thing about this trend of buying guitars as investments all depends on the nostalgia/romanticism attached to it all. There's a certain generation of people who now have a lot of disposable income and are inclined to buy these instruments based on that and the assumption that prices will always go up.

But that will not always be so. As musical tastes and trends change, fewer people will be infatuated with many models, and values will fade unless someone else comes along and makes a splash playing a certain one. Jack White did so for resoglass guitars and Silvertone amps, Kurt Cobain did so for Jaguars and Mustangs.

So I say the same thing about buying a house as I do for guitars - buy it to use, not an investment. People who buy such things and never use them are taking a risk, and can probably afford to do so. I'm not in their league and not going to play their game, but I'm happy to watch from the sidelines and to go visit open houses and play expensive guitars when I'm allowed.

Well stated.

There are people who collect guitars as an investment, and in at least some cases, it works well. Personally, I don’t see guitars as an investment vehicle, in great part because guitars, as important as they are to us, are not essential to survive, and just the time that you need your investments to be at their best will coincide with the time when prices will be decreasing.

I have investments, but I don’t buy things I enjoy, such as guitars, with the idea that these are investments. In the net, I’ve lost a lot of money on guitar purchases.

The artist formerly known as: Synchro

When Surf Guitar is outlawed only outlaws will play Surf Guitar.

Ariel wrote:

It's an investment, like any item of the huge market for antiques and vintage instrument. Better than gold or stocks IMHO for the long term - these things are one of a kind, from a specific era and hold an epic romanticism around them. Plenty of people appreciate that, thus the value.

I don’t think it’s possible to disagree with this premise to the extent it deserves. Counting on guitars as investments is equal to the beanie baby craze of the 90’s. Kids today don’t want overpriced old guitars when they can get something new, superior, and at a fraction of the cost. When the older crowd dies, the vintage guitar market will die with them.

J

Collection isn't my thing personally, but I get it.
nismosurf - Sure, most kids won't, but some will, and that's enough.
There will always be romantics. As things modernize and trends change, the 1st gen tech has even more appeal because it is unique and has historic value. That's what "Hipsterism" is all about, for ex.
Also, as for using it, generally, the quality of the higher tier items back then was usually better.

Now tell me, don't you wish you'd have bought all those un-cool vintage '60 Strats, Jags, JM's, Showmans and reverb tanks back in the '80s when everybody was looking to get rid of them?

Even my '65 Showman is worth now twice the value I paid for it less than 10 years ago, though I bought it to play, and still do.
I wish I kept my early '80s synths and drum machines, their prices are crazy now.

And if you don't enjoy the appreciation in your lifetime, your kids might.

Now tell me, don't you wish you'd have bought all those un-cool vintage '60 Strats, Jags, JM's, Showmans and reverb tanks back in the '80s when everybody was looking to get rid of them?

Not in the least little bit.

And if you don't enjoy the appreciation in your lifetime, your kids might.

I don’t have kids and I have no desire to spend my money on things to leave behind to others.

J

Right at the moment, vintage guitars (and strangely, even some vintage amps, which not long ago were a real hard sell) are going through a big wave of popularity and price-gouging. Even vintage reissues, and good American and Japanese-made used guitars have shot up a lot. IMHO, the prices on a lot of new higher-end guitars and amps are nutty, and I think that has tended to pull vintage/used prices up with them. My advice (I used to be a mostly-vintage guitar dealer, in the 90s when it was still fun) is to avoid paying top gouge prices. This same type of wave happened in around 2005-2007, and then the whole thing crashed. If buying with the expectation of appreciation (or even holding value) avoid buying stuff at the top of the market. This is true for any commodity, which collectible guitars are certainly an example of.

One thing that has changed since 2007 is that the supply of clean, vintage guitars has dwindled, and the market is significantly more international than it was then. So that may help buoy prices somewhat in the event of a general economic downturn. But still, I personally avoid paying top-gouge price for stuff. I'm primarily a player, not a collector. But I don't like the idea of taking a bath when buying stuff either.

Also, right at the moment, there are some good alternatives to buying ridiculously priced vintage guitars. Examples have already been given. I think the Classic Vibe stuff and certain reissues are a good alternative. I have found that some of this imported stuff does need work - lots of sharp fret ends, and some need fret leveling and other not-so-trivial setup work. I assume some of this is the result of production in a very warm, humid climate and poor reaction to being shipped to a relatively cold, dry climate. Plus I think some of the wood is not very well seasoned (IMO). But I have found that if I let the wood acclimate some and then take care of the issues, I generally wind up with a pretty good guitar.

The Delverados - surf, punk, trash, twang - Facebook
Chicken Tractor Deluxe - hardcore Americana - Facebook and Website
The Telegrassers - semi-electric bluegrass/Americana - Facebook

nismosurf wrote:

When the older crowd dies, the vintage guitar market will die with them.

You might be right about that, but it might not be so simple. People mention guitar heroes that haven't been in the mainstream pop arena for 30 years. Yet young kids are being influenced by them. The antique car scene has not suffered from the generation that bought them new dying off. I think it's a little more nuanced than how you put it. Another factor, is that far more folks who buy music gear now are collectors. This was not the case until somewhere around the early 90s. Right before eBay. No one was buying first year Barbies and keeping them mint in their boxes, compared to the 90s where everyone was buying toys and keeping them in their closets untouched.

I think it's more likely vintage music gear starts ending up in museums and rich people's collections. Which means it is a solid investment today!

Daniel Deathtide

DaveMudgett wrote:

Also, right at the moment, there are some good alternatives to buying ridiculously priced vintage guitars. Examples have already been given. I think the Classic Vibe stuff and certain reissues are a good alternative. I have found that some of this imported stuff does need work - lots of sharp fret ends, and some need fret leveling and other not-so-trivial setup work. I assume some of this is the result of production in a very warm, humid climate and poor reaction to being shipped to a relatively cold, dry climate. Plus I think some of the wood is not very well seasoned (IMO). But I have found that if I let the wood acclimate some and then take care of the issues, I generally wind up with a pretty good guitar.

… which is really what most people are looking for. A CV Squier, plus a bit of sweat equity, can be a heck of a bargain. At the end of the day, the greatest value is in the playing.

Collectibility is all well and good, but it only goes so far. A friend of mine owns some great guitars, such as one of Hank Garland’s Byrdlands and Johnny Smith’s Epiphone Triumph. I’ve placed both, and they are great instruments, but I can get sounds every bit as good from my Guild T-400, which is only about 10 years old.

Some of the budget solid bodies available these days, are astoundingly good, and sell for the price of a decent case. I have two Squiers which I wouldn’t bother to replace with US made Fenders. There’s just not that much to gain.

The artist formerly known as: Synchro

When Surf Guitar is outlawed only outlaws will play Surf Guitar.

DeathTide wrote:

nismosurf wrote:

When the older crowd dies, the vintage guitar market will die with them.

You might be right about that, but it might not be so simple. People mention guitar heroes that haven't been in the mainstream pop arena for 30 years. Yet young kids are being influenced by them. The antique car scene has not suffered from the generation that bought them new dying off. I think it's a little more nuanced than how you put it. Another factor, is that far more folks who buy music gear now are collectors. This was not the case until somewhere around the early 90s. Right before eBay. No one was buying first year Barbies and keeping them mint in their boxes, compared to the 90s where everyone was buying toys and keeping them in their closets untouched.

I think it's more likely vintage music gear starts ending up in museums and rich people's collections. Which means it is a solid investment today!

I see your point, but that market could reach its limit. If I were a multimillionaire, I might want a ‘59 Burst, and a number of other guitars, but why would I want a massive collection of these? Rick Nielson, whom I respect as a player and songwriter, has a massive collection with several vintage Flying Vs and Bursts and what have you. Why?

Investment? Maybe, but that’s far from a lead pipe cinch. If Nielson’s collection hit the street all at once, it could have an effect on prices overall. Sure thing investments are never actually a sure thing.

The artist formerly known as: Synchro

When Surf Guitar is outlawed only outlaws will play Surf Guitar.

synchro wrote:

why would I want a massive collection

Only you can answer that! I see a lot of collectors get crap for being collectors from people who use the stuff that they are collecting. These users don't appreciate the collectors, in my opinion. As you point out, who cares if vintage guitars are $20,000 when you can buy a $400 guitar and get almost the same experience? The answer is collectors. Without the collectors, users would have nothing but new, or tattered beat up old junk to play with. There is room in this vast world for both, and the truth is the players and collectors are a far more entwined than most people want to think. If a player is complaining about vintage guitar prices, then they are also a collector! Otherwise they would be happy with their $400 Squires, full stop.

Daniel Deathtide

Ariel wrote:

Now tell me, don't you wish you'd have bought all those un-cool vintage '60 Strats, Jags, JM's, Showmans and reverb tanks back in the '80s when everybody was looking to get rid of them?

I was one who was lucky enough to buy an un-cool 1967 Jaguar for $300 in 1985 - because I wanted a Jaguar to play. Looking back, there are certainly a lot of guitars I wish I had bought before they became trendy - Danelectros, Supros, Harmonys, etc - but again, it would have been so I could play them. Increased value is just a bonus, and something I am not counting on.

JohnnyMosrite wrote:

Firetone,
In my opinion - A person has to have more money than brains to buy an instrument for 5 to 6 figures. As much as we like them, they are just guitars - wood and wire.
Trust me, I have instruments that could command those prices; but I sure as hell did not acquire them at those prices.

Case in point:
I like Mosrite guitars - no big secret there.
I recently saw a 1963 set neck Ventures model, serial number 0011 (I think Nokie's was 0008) for over $33,000.00.
Could I acquire it? Yes.
Would I acquire it? Absolutely not. I have a bit too much respect for hard earned money. And the thing isn't going to play or sound any better than the Mosrites I own - at least not $30,000.00+ worth better.

But to you - if it's a "Gotta have", then have at it.

All my humble opinion, of course.
J Mo'

That “63” is of questionable authenticity, and I’m being generous when I say that.

Last edited: Jul 07, 2023 13:50:46

Garret,
Maybe. All I noticed was a different switch tip on pickup selector.
It's always a red flag when you see out-of-this-world high prices: Is it real or is it "Memorex"?
And, at the price being asked, I, for one, don't want to find out the hard way that it is not real.

It's in better shape than it should be for a 60-year-old instrument.
I wonder what "story" is queued for that possible question.
Seller doesn't mention date codes on the pots or expose the inner circuitry. Hmmmm. And those should be Kluson double line tuners; not single line. The control knobs look like the Japanese knockoffs.
And any dope can get wood stamping equipment on Ebay and make a time-correct serial number.

Observations of a healthy skeptic - make that cynic.
J Mo'

Last edited: Jul 09, 2023 08:42:48

Garret,
Seller may get a bit miffed with me. But I've been "miffed at" before.
So - what the hell..?
I asked these questions on reverb.

Some observations and questions:
1. Switch tip should be metal with a double ring indentation all around the top.
2. Pictures of the circuitry would be helpful. While you are at it, please send a picture of the pot date codes and resistance values of the control pots.
3. Control knobs look like Japanese knock offs. I know what the correct knobs should look like. Picture is a bit fuzzy so perhaps you could send a clearer picture of the knobs close up?
4. A picture of the pickup undersides would also be helpful. Ed Elliott makes the "Logo-less" pickups. They can be distinguished from the 63 originals - your pickup covers just look a little too new.
5. The tuners should be KLUSON
double line tuners. Yours look to be single line. What's up with that?
6. Is that finish nitro or poly?
7. The thing looks a bit too unplayed for a 60-year-old instrument. What's the story behind that?
8. The nut should be 1/2-round; yours looks to be 1/4 round. - totally wrong for a 1963 model.

I hope you take these questions in the spirit intended. There are a lot of "fakes" out there and your price is quite steep. It's steep enough that all aspects of that guitar should ALL be authentic.
thanks in advance__

I'll report any feedback.
J Mo'

Last edited: Jul 07, 2023 16:08:07

Nice J!! If the seller has integrity, they will be very interested in all of your comments and questions. If they are a scammer, they are put in a tough spot! Well done.

Daniel Deathtide

Response so far:
Regarding the switch tip. It appears the same age as the other plastics and seeing other early examples sometimes with plastic I leave it as an unknown without a build sheet. As each guitar tends to be subtly unique in the early years. Regarding the finish. It is actually much more aged the the photos reveal. I had trouble getting the camera to truly show the finish checking and color aging. In person it feels every bit vintage as a guitar from that period. I expect to have these in-depth reviews with a serious buyer. Note, it was purchased from a notable guitar boutique in Nashville that certified its authenticity. Let me get back to you with your requests.__

And the "Nashville guitar boutique" mentioned suggests either Gruhn Guitars or Carter Vintage.
The "unknown without a build sheet" regarding the switch tip does not give me a warm fuzzy.
Awaiting some more thorough feedback. Stay tuned.
J Mo'

Last edited: Jul 07, 2023 17:58:18

JohnnyMosrite wrote:

Response so far:
Regarding the switch tip. It appears the same age as the other plastics and seeing other early examples sometimes with plastic I leave it as an unknown without a build sheet. As each guitar tends to be subtly unique in the early years. Regarding the finish. It is actually much more aged the the photos reveal. I had trouble getting the camera to truly show the finish checking and color aging. In person it feels every bit vintage as a guitar from that period. I expect to have these in-depth reviews with a serious buyer. Note, it was purchased from a notable guitar boutique in Nashville that certified its authenticity. Let me get back to you with your requests.__

And the "Nashville guitar boutique" mentioned suggests either Gruhn Guitars or Carter Vintage.
The "unknown without a build sheet" regarding the switch tip does not give me a warm fuzzy.
Awaiting some more thorough feedback. Stay tuned.
J Mo'

At the risk of being pedantic here’s what I see wrong with the guitar:
Plastics are wrong. Prior to 1965 Mosrites had cast resin pickup bezels and heat formed pickup covers. This guitar has injection molded bezels and the shape of the covers looks off.
The pickup switch tip would either be spun brass (plated) or the taller black Switchcraft tip as seen on the first Ventures II models.
The inner ply of the body binding is too thick and all the binding is the wrong color.
The neck binding doesn’t wrap around the end of the fingerboard and is also the wrong color.
The serial number is stamped in the wrong place and the font looks different.
The German carve contour in the cutaways is wrong and is more like a later Mosrite.
The bridge height adjustment screws are too short (the part that the bridge sits on). Early Mosrites were still using the ones made for the solid aluminum bridge and are taller.
The bridge is of the post 1965 type. The first roller bridges were narrower and cruder.
The Vibramute is rough sandcast. The tailpiece for this low a serial number should be polished chrome or the early aluminum Vibramute.
You’ve noted the string guide issue.
I’d like to see pot dates and the underside of the pickups.
On another note the double line Klusons aren’t available until 1965, so single line is actually correct for 63-64.
The case isn’t original to the guitar (it was on Reverb from a different seller a while ago).
I have a guitar that’s pretty similar that I’ve always assumed to be a late 70s reissue based on the pots and pickup construction, or a forgery from the 70s.
But the honest truth is that the asking price is almost 20K higher than what a genuine 63 Ventures would command these days, so I can’t imagine anybody is going to be at risk of actually purchasing it.

Last edited: Jul 07, 2023 21:33:48

While this thread has gone on a tangent, I find it really informative. It just goes to show that anyone thinking about forking out big bucks for a vintage guitar should pay attention to the details, and there are a lot of details to learn about.

Garrett,
I pressed - quite respectfully - for the information I requested. This is what I got after the seller's diatribe of how this instrument qualifies for its price:
Seller:
"require dialog to be respectful and kind every step of the process"

Me:
OK so where wasn't the dialog respectful?
I just stated some reasonable questions that haven't been answered yet. Hopefully some answers materialize in the next few days. So - to add another - Who "Authenicated" the guitar for you as you so stated?
Politely and respectfully, also - I ask direct questions and "tap-dance" answers about instrument values are just a red flag - especially when a $33,500.00 price tag is involved

Seller:
I appreciate your interest in this guitar. I wish you luck in finding the right one for your needs and budget. Cheers.

So, no answers to my questions forthcoming. How this guy expects some sucker to shell out $33,500.00 for a guitar he won't answer questions about is quite laughable these days.

Garrett, thanks for your input. I actually learned something more about my favorite guitar from your responses.

J Mo'

Last edited: Jul 09, 2023 15:07:47

Goto Page: Previous 1 2 3 Next
Top