raylinds
Joined: Jul 05, 2019
Posts: 141
|
Posted on May 30 2020 09:23 AM
I've been trying to research what mics were used in the very early surf guitar recordings, without any luck. I know the Shure SM57 has been the go-to mic for guitars, but they did not come out until 1965. I am trying to find out what was used before (and possibly after) the venerable SM57 became available.
Any thoughts?
|
nedorama
Joined: Oct 10, 2009
Posts: 221
South Bay, CA
|
Posted on May 30 2020 01:07 PM
Probably the Shure 545 Unidyne III, which came out in '59 and was the precursor to the 57.
Tube mics like the Neumann U47, U67 could have also been used.
Other dynamic mics:
ElectroVoice had their 664 cardioid;
Altec
—
'65 Fender Tremolux, '74 Princeton; 77 Vibrolux Reverb; '81 Princeton Reverb
'65-66 Hilgen Basso Grande
Dr. Z MAZ 18 Jr. + 1x12 Cab
Various Telecasters and noise-making pedals
Farfisa Compact Duo
|
Kawentzmann
Joined: Feb 27, 2006
Posts: 1058
Berlin, Germany
|
Posted on May 30 2020 02:12 PM
What I read ElctroVoice and Altecs were indeed quite common. Also RCA ribbons were used in the 50s and 60s. The bass on the The Astronauts’ debut album appears to be miked with one, looking at the back cover. Of course with an 8-pattern you’d have to be careful in a small and/or crowded room and engineers might switch to a cardioid pattern mic of some kind to avoid phase issues.
— The Exotic Guitar of Kahuna Kawentzmann
You can get the boy out of the Keynes era, but you can’t get the Keynes era out of the boy.
|
psychonaut
Joined: Dec 08, 2007
Posts: 1303
|
Posted on May 30 2020 02:17 PM
Neumann u47 or u48 (tube powered condenser)
RCA 77DX (Ribbon, used on "surfing with the Astronauts")
RCA 44BX (ribbon)
Electro Voice 666 (dynamic)
Sony C37 (condenser)
Western Electric 639 (Ribbon)
Were probably the most common mics in the early 60"s. All very expensive mics.
It's not just the mics though, the tube preamps and tube mixers, and tube compressors also played a huge role in the sound of those records, not to mention the sound of tape also having a big impact
— https://www.facebook.com/coffindagger
http://coffindaggers.com/
http://thecoffindaggers.bandcamp.com
Last edited: May 30, 2020 14:37:01
|
nedorama
Joined: Oct 10, 2009
Posts: 221
South Bay, CA
|
Posted on May 30 2020 02:35 PM
Ribbon mics or any non cardioid mics were less of an issue because close-micing hadn't been developed - partially because engineers were worried about damaging amp capsules, but also number of mixer channels, and that usually everyone was playing live to mono with minimal overdubs - may have been instruments on 1 track, vocals on another and then mixed. So with a lot of these earlier albums (and in general) bleed was OK, and if a part ws too loud, the amp might be turned down or moved.
Had forgotten about the ribbon mics, and it's funny/good to see how ribbon mics have enjoyed a comeback, not only with AEA reissuing the old RCA designs, but with Royer and others bringing out new ones.
—
'65 Fender Tremolux, '74 Princeton; 77 Vibrolux Reverb; '81 Princeton Reverb
'65-66 Hilgen Basso Grande
Dr. Z MAZ 18 Jr. + 1x12 Cab
Various Telecasters and noise-making pedals
Farfisa Compact Duo
|
psychonaut
Joined: Dec 08, 2007
Posts: 1303
|
Posted on May 30 2020 02:40 PM
nedorama wrote:
Ribbon mics or any non cardioid mics were less of an issue because close-micing hadn't been developed - partially because engineers were worried about damaging amp capsules, but also number of mixer channels, and that usually everyone was playing live to mono with minimal overdubs - may have been instruments on 1 track, vocals on another and then mixed. So with a lot of these earlier albums (and in general) bleed was OK, and if a part ws too loud, the amp might be turned down or moved.
Had forgotten about the ribbon mics, and it's funny/good to see how ribbon mics have enjoyed a comeback, not only with AEA reissuing the old RCA designs, but with Royer and others bringing out new ones.
Actually RCA 77dx have a selectable polar pattern, they can do Omni, figure 8, cardioid or hyper cardioid.
AEA are great mics, but are just as expensive as buying an original RCA.
— https://www.facebook.com/coffindagger
http://coffindaggers.com/
http://thecoffindaggers.bandcamp.com
|
Vince_Ray
Joined: Aug 26, 2015
Posts: 252
|
Posted on May 30 2020 04:21 PM
I found that close micing was the main culprit in not getting a sound like the old records. Very happy to record with condenser mics, maybe. A 57 style on the snare. Screens and positioning mics helps with bleed, but I like a bit of bleed. A vital ingredient in the soup of old recordings.
|
Kawentzmann
Joined: Feb 27, 2006
Posts: 1058
Berlin, Germany
|
Posted on May 31 2020 03:44 AM
In this test I hear that the older mics carry more room information and general detail than a Shure SM 57.
— The Exotic Guitar of Kahuna Kawentzmann
You can get the boy out of the Keynes era, but you can’t get the Keynes era out of the boy.
|
mike_fried
Joined: Aug 02, 2012
Posts: 162
Nashville, TN
|
Posted on May 31 2020 06:12 PM
An SM57/Unidyne III would be best used for close-micing sources such as a snare or a guitar amp cabinet. As has been previously mentioned, not a lot of that was done back in the day. Ribbon mics were/are really a not-so-secret sauce; in a good room a good engineer can make them do just about anything better than any other type of mic. The figure-8 pattern is utilized for its extreme side rejection as well as its ability to capture the room sound and/or another element intentionally placed behind it. Unfortunately, the "good (big enough) room" aspect is what's most challenging for most home recordists (myself included) in capturing an accurate old school sound, even if they have the rest of the requisite gear and chops to use it.
|
Vince_Ray
Joined: Aug 26, 2015
Posts: 252
|
Posted on Jun 01 2020 12:27 AM
Good point about the room and it's size. Plus many studios are either small or dead sounding
these days. Foam everywhere and 'hey, I got a plug in for that kinda ambient room'. Ah well, it's definitely a fun time for home recording
Last edited: Jun 01, 2020 00:28:47
|
nedorama
Joined: Oct 10, 2009
Posts: 221
South Bay, CA
|
Posted on Jun 01 2020 12:44 AM
psychonaut wrote:
Actually RCA 77dx have a selectable polar pattern, they can do Omni, figure 8, cardioid or hyper cardioid.
AEA are great mics, but are just as expensive as buying an original RCA.
that I didn't know - thanks!
While buying an original RCA is great, usually the ribbon motor is shot from age or poor handling as well as electrolytic caps. So you could buy an old one to rehab or get the AEA. I haven't bought either but I know that vintage ribbon mics there are more concerns than vintage dynamic or condenser mics.
—
'65 Fender Tremolux, '74 Princeton; 77 Vibrolux Reverb; '81 Princeton Reverb
'65-66 Hilgen Basso Grande
Dr. Z MAZ 18 Jr. + 1x12 Cab
Various Telecasters and noise-making pedals
Farfisa Compact Duo
|
raylinds
Joined: Jul 05, 2019
Posts: 141
|
Posted on Jun 01 2020 09:47 PM
After doing more research I decided that a ribbon mic might be a good choice. I found a Golden Age Project R1 Tube Active Ribbon Microphone that utilizes a 12ax7 tube that has gotten good reviews and sells for $350. Yes an AEA or vintage would probably be better, but for home recording, this might be the way to go.
|
CrazyAces
Joined: Jul 31, 2012
Posts: 4052
Nashville, TN.
|
Posted on Jun 01 2020 10:19 PM
I have three budget ribbon mics and love them all for home recording.
raylinds, it sounds like you went with a good choice for what you are seeking.
Let us know how it works out.
Cheers,
Jeff
— http://www.facebook.com/CrazyAcesMusic
http://www.youtube.com/user/crazyacesrock
http://www.reverbnation.com/crazyacesmusic
|
Vince_Ray
Joined: Aug 26, 2015
Posts: 252
|
Posted on Jun 03 2020 12:42 AM
Which is your favourite low budget ribbon mic Jeff? I'm looking for something to record vocals with at home
CrazyAces wrote:
I have three budget ribbon mics and love them all for home recording.
raylinds, it sounds like you went with a good choice for what you are seeking.
Let us know how it works out.
Cheers,
Jeff
|
CrazyAces
Joined: Jul 31, 2012
Posts: 4052
Nashville, TN.
|
Posted on Jun 03 2020 10:07 AM
Vince_Ray wrote:
Which is your favourite low budget ribbon mic Jeff? I'm looking for something to record vocals with at home
CrazyAces wrote:
My favorite is a discontinued model, a Nady RSM-2.I have used it for guitar tracks, drums and one or two vocals however I don't record vocals much at all so there may be a better choice. Back in the early 2000's when I got this mic a few of my friends that own pro studios (read: they know way more what they are doing than I do) borrowed this mic and instantly bought pairs of their own so, I guess it's pretty good sounding.
I've also had great success with a Nady RSM-5 (guitars and kick drum) and an MXL R40 (overhead and drums)
You can see the RSM-2 in the third post/picture down in this post, in front of my Supro Super amp. The mic looks vaguely RCA-77 ish. I'm actually recording "Thrown Away" on that setup.
https://surfguitar101.com/forums/topic/22400/
Hope that helps,
Jeff
— http://www.facebook.com/CrazyAcesMusic
http://www.youtube.com/user/crazyacesrock
http://www.reverbnation.com/crazyacesmusic
Last edited: Jun 03, 2020 10:11:27
|
BrentD
Joined: Apr 07, 2009
Posts: 149
Michigan
|
Posted on Jun 03 2020 10:27 AM
I bought a couple of the Sterling ST170 active ribbons. They need phantom power but don't need an external preamp (which a lot of ribbons do due to low output). They're sensitive enough I can't use them as low drum overheads without pads.
They're built very well and I think I got them on sale for about $160 each.
— Neptune Trojans
|