Photo of the Day
Shoutbox

SHADOWNIGHT5150: Bank accounts are a scam created by a shadow government
266 days ago

sysmalakian: TODAY IS MY BIRTHDAY!
252 days ago

dp: dude
233 days ago

Bango_Rilla: Shout Bananas!!
188 days ago

BillyBlastOff: See you kiddies at the Convention!
172 days ago

GDW: showman
123 days ago

Emilien03: https://losg...
45 days ago

Pyronauts: Happy Tanks-Kicking!!!
38 days ago

glennmagi: CLAM SHACK guitar
24 days ago

Hothorseraddish: surf music is amazing
4 days ago

Please login or register to shout.

Current Polls

No polls at this time. Check out our past polls.

Current Contests

No contests at this time. Check out our past contests.

Donations

Help us meet our monthly goal:

29%

29%

Donate Now

Cake January Birthdays Cake
SG101 Banner

SurfGuitar101 Forums » Surf Musician »

Permalink Song Similarity Legalities

New Topic
Page 1 of 1

I'm just curious about how this issue works. I came up with this song that's a lot like an existing song and wondering how it would be handled if I were to attempt to publish it (not that this is likely any time soon.) Is there some entity to which you bring a piece and ask for judgment? Or do you just pay for the rights to the song even if it might not be technically necessary? How much difference does there need to be to qualify as original? Is it guache to publish something as original that's just barely different enough to be legally considered so?

An example comes to mind. The song "Failsafe" as recorded by the New Dimensions and then the Original Surfaris. I wouldn't have thought this is the same song, as they seem pretty significantly different, but apparently not different enough?

Actually, now that I listen to them back to back, it's more obvious..

Those two songs have the same drippy rhythm guitar, same chords, similar piano and same melody.

You can ask a music copyright lawyer for their opinion, but you can still get sued despite their opinion. If you think you are copying a song, probably a good idea to credit.

Is it guache to publish something as original that's just barely different enough to be legally considered so?

Yes, but more importantly there is nothing new about it.

The only thing that is copyright protected are specific melodies. You can't copyright song titles, chord progressions or grooves, or arrangements. those are all fair game. Think of how many songs have the "You Can't Hurry Love" bassline. Although The "Blurred Lines" lawsuit of a couple of years ago blurred those lines (no pun intended)as that song only really stole the groove of the Marvin Gaye song, yet they still had to pay, it seems it was a little too similar.
If you think it's too similar, then change it till its not, or take the risk, Led Zeppelin made a whole career out of that!

https://www.facebook.com/coffindagger
http://coffindaggers.com/
http://thecoffindaggers.bandcamp.com

Last edited: Jan 21, 2017 05:34:02

I used to worry about this sort of thing and over the years realized that with the lack of a broad audience and for financial reward, there's no impetus for anyone to have a legal issue with you. Unless you name your song "Mc" something or related to Disney, because they'll go after anybody Smile Seriously, there's only so many chords and notes that work with them. Have fun and keep writing. Not every song is going to be a masterpiece but if you keep at it you'll eventually knock out one or two.

Danny Snyder

"With great reverb comes great responsibility" - Uncle Leo

Playing keys and guitar with Combo Tezeta

Formerly a guitarist in The TomorrowMen and Meshugga Beach Party

Latest surf project - Now That's What I Call SURF

Bang goes my next song then "McDisney Finger Lickin Cola"

Applejack.

Liverpool.

Compare these. The Vulcanes and Jet Harris/Tony Meehan...both record labels show different names. The melody is identical!

Both lovely renditions though. And both great bands.

Page 1 of 1
Top