matt
Joined: Oct 18, 2010
Posts: 656
Boston, MA
|

Posted on Nov 01 2015 06:06 PM
Can someone explain to me what the advantage/disadvantage of the effects loop on my amp is? would running my tank through the loop do anything better or worse? I could experiment of course, but I imagine someone on this forum has done the leg work....(it's a quilter micropro).
thanks!
— Matt Heaton & the Electric Heaters
Boston's Premier Surf/Noir Combo
http://www.heatonsurf.com
|
stratdancer
Joined: Dec 11, 2013
Posts: 2537
Akron, Ohio
|

Posted on Nov 01 2015 06:14 PM
All those time devices are supposed to be used in the loop but I have never liked running them on my marshalls in the loop. Don't have a loop in my old Fender amps. I can assure you that the tank needs to be in front and not in the loop. Might work ok but I doubt if anyone would agree.
— The Kahuna Kings
https://www.facebook.com/pages/The-Kahuna-Kings/459752090818447
https://thekahunakings.bandcamp.com/releases
Last edited: Nov 01, 2015 18:14:56
|
crumble
Joined: Sep 09, 2008
Posts: 3158
Guildford England
|

Posted on Nov 01 2015 06:43 PM
The Quilter guy on YouTube said some effects might work better through the loop and some work best through the front input. There is no problem using them both simultaneously.
Last edited: Nov 01, 2015 18:56:12
|
SanchoPansen
Joined: Jan 04, 2011
Posts: 1588
Berlin L-Berg
|

Posted on Nov 02 2015 01:49 AM
Usually you put pedals that are supposed to work as a preamp before the (tube)amp to drive those tubes and make the amp sound 'hotter'. A tank has a similar effect, which simply won't work if used in the effects loop.
You will also have less 'drip', as the tank needs to be hit directly by your signal in order to make the springs move.
But these are all just rules of thumb and there is no right or wrong. Try to experiment and find what sounds best for you. Trust your ears.
I don't play amps with effect loops and if I did, I wouldn't bother with it, as setting up a combination of pedals before and in the loop sounds like a lot of cable to me. And I'm lazy. 
— The Hicadoolas
|
killbabykill34
Joined: Apr 03, 2010
Posts: 3201
Jacksonville, AL
|

Posted on Nov 02 2015 07:01 AM
I am in agreement with SanchoPansen. Pedals like overdrive and boosters are designed to be in front of the amp in order to further drive the onboard tubes. And the outboard tank is essentially a preamp in it's own right. It does need to be in front of the amp in order to get the effect that most of us depend on for our sound.
Other effects like delay and trem are more of a grey area. While the general rule of thumb for most of us here is to place signal in the order listed below, I have certainly seen others do differently.
In the end, follow your ears. Tone chasing is a habit most of us have. But what is more impressive than nailing that tone from an old record is to nail YOUR OWN tone. I am just going to throw out one person. Brain Causey(Starcrunch) of Man or Astro-man?. He bucked the trends early on and now has a tone that is both his own and that others try to emulate.
Boosts/Overdrives -> Modulation Effects (Delay, tremolo, etc.) -> Reverb -> Amplifier
— THE KBK ... This is the last known signal. We offer Sanctuary.
www.thekbk.com
http://www.deepeddy.net/artists/thekbk/
www.reverbnation.com/thekbk
www.facebook.com/thekbkal
|
matt
Joined: Oct 18, 2010
Posts: 656
Boston, MA
|

Posted on Nov 02 2015 07:13 AM
This all makes sense, thanks gang. so what is the actual purpose of an amp effects loop? does it reduce noise or just when you're not using pedals they don't passively suck tone (or whatever?)
— Matt Heaton & the Electric Heaters
Boston's Premier Surf/Noir Combo
http://www.heatonsurf.com
|
LoeD
Joined: Feb 29, 2012
Posts: 310
Germany
|

Posted on Nov 02 2015 07:19 AM
I always recommend to put drive/boost before reverb before delay/termolo.
Why?
Because a dry signal can be boosted or distorted in a - to my ears - better sounding way.
Then the reverberation takes place.
After that I put delay and tremolo, because a already reverberated signal sounds - again in my ears - better when it get´s delayed or tremoloed after the reverb.
Try the following: put reverb after the tremolo / delay. What happens? The rhythmic quality gets washed out because the reverb covers all rhythm of delay and tremolo under its decay of the tone.
If you put the delay / tremolo after the reverb. the finished reverberated signal gets its rhythm without any softening by the reverb.
That´s what Amps normally also do:
The reverb is either in front of the Amp or built in before the tremolo section.
I believe Leo had a clue what he did when designing those circuits and I like the sound this way better than vice versa.
cheers
LoeD
PS: A fx lood makes sense only, when you use the amps internal overdrive capabilities. Because then you can add delay chorus etc. after the overdrive which would be impossible if you don´t have the loop.
To make it short:
Give it a try and hook your stomp boxes in any order and any place you want. (only not in front of the speaker) Check if you like it and change until it sounds best for you.
There´s no right or wrong. And nobody can tell you. Just do it!
— here comes the WEST SAMOA SURFER LEAGUE
Last edited: Nov 02, 2015 07:20:57
|
killbabykill34
Joined: Apr 03, 2010
Posts: 3201
Jacksonville, AL
|

Posted on Nov 02 2015 08:35 AM
matt wrote:
This all makes sense, thanks gang. so what is the actual purpose of an amp effects loop? does it reduce noise or just when you're not using pedals they don't passively suck tone (or whatever?)
I can only give information as it relates to my 30 years of playing. With that in mind, to understand the "effects loop" on your amp is to place it in the context of something completely opposite of what we are all doing here in the surf community. I personally equate it to the 1980's. This was a time of very processed guitar. Rack mount, multi-effect units were all the rage. And most guitarists I knew ran them through their effects loop. This wasn't a time in music when most in rock and pop were trying to embrace the natural tone characteristics of their tube amps.
— THE KBK ... This is the last known signal. We offer Sanctuary.
www.thekbk.com
http://www.deepeddy.net/artists/thekbk/
www.reverbnation.com/thekbk
www.facebook.com/thekbkal
|
SanchoPansen
Joined: Jan 04, 2011
Posts: 1588
Berlin L-Berg
|

Posted on Nov 02 2015 09:38 AM
The effects loop is used when you want to add a certain amount of effect after the preamp stage. In times of solid state and digital effects this has become more and more standard, as it allows you to create a certain tone with your amp and then add some flavor to it. E.g. you have found a nice tone with your amp and now you want to add a really crazy effect, like let's say a BOSS Flanger with everything cranked to max. If you do that in front of the amp, you will only hear a warbling psychedelic sound coming out of the speakers. If you put it in the effects loop, you can add just a little bit of that effect to the signal, as it allows you to control the dry/wet of the effect to be added. Hope that makes sense.
— The Hicadoolas
|
NYStan
Joined: Jan 10, 2012
Posts: 68
|

Posted on Nov 02 2015 10:52 AM
The effects loop is usually used for chorus, flanger, echoed and delays even though you could still run them through the front of the amp. It will create a different sound weather you run it in front compared to the effects loop. I would suggest trying both record it and see which sounds better to you. I used to use a fuzz pedal in the front of my amp cause that's where everyone says it should be. I had switched the fuzz pedal to the effects loop and I was pleasently surprised at the cool spacey effect it made. If I didn't experiment I would've never found that cool effect. Theirs no harm in experimenting with effects in order to make a unique sound.
— http://www.reverbnation.com/nucleusaccumbensstimulation
|
killbabykill34
Joined: Apr 03, 2010
Posts: 3201
Jacksonville, AL
|

Posted on Nov 02 2015 11:40 AM
For a very long time, during my alt. and punk days, I would run a Boss EQ pedal through the effects loop of my Marshall head. Not only did it fix the issue I had with a lack of low end, but it also allowed me to really fine tune my tone.
— THE KBK ... This is the last known signal. We offer Sanctuary.
www.thekbk.com
http://www.deepeddy.net/artists/thekbk/
www.reverbnation.com/thekbk
www.facebook.com/thekbkal
|
ebrobston
Joined: Feb 14, 2010
Posts: 122
birmingham alabama
|

Posted on Nov 02 2015 02:38 PM
NYStan - I have heard that running fuzz through the effects loop could damage the amp. Just sayin'
— www.reverbnation.com/thehighfidelics
|
NYStan
Joined: Jan 10, 2012
Posts: 68
|

Posted on Nov 02 2015 10:40 PM
That's what I heard b4 I tried it. I've been playing with a fuzz pedal running in the effects loop of an amp head for a couple years just about every other day with no problem at all.
— http://www.reverbnation.com/nucleusaccumbensstimulation
|
dboomer
Joined: Jan 05, 2009
Posts: 262
Port Hueneme, CA
|

Posted on Nov 02 2015 11:44 PM
ebrobston wrote:
NYStan - I have heard that running fuzz through the effects loop could damage the amp. Just sayin'
That's doubtful. Most effects loops are just a place in the signal chain that is running a a higher voltage level (compared to the input of your amp that expects to see the very tiny voltage from a guitar pickup. So running in the loop typically will produce less noise (because a good part of the total gain is in front of the loop and so things in the loop aren't amplified as much (including any noise from your effect).
There will be a difference in the sound however depending whether you go in at the input of an amp on in the loop. This is mainly because most effects can/do add some boost so when you plug in the front end of your amp you are contributing to overdriving the preamp section. This doesn't happen when you go into at the effects loop. So whether that difference is a benefit or a detractor depends on how you expect the sound to be.
|
NYStan
Joined: Jan 10, 2012
Posts: 68
|

Posted on Nov 03 2015 10:27 AM
I have also run my DejaVibe pedal in front of the amp instead of in the effects loop as it sounds so much better in front. You have to experiment to find the unique sound you might be looking for.
— http://www.reverbnation.com/nucleusaccumbensstimulation
|
jdmcduders
Joined: Jan 14, 2013
Posts: 140
Indianapolis, IN
|

Posted on Nov 03 2015 09:04 PM
I've found that I like my delay, tremolo, and reverb in my effects loop. To me the tremolo sounds deeper and the reverb and delay are a little cleaner. In my experience boost pedals are more powerful as a clean volume boost and not pushing the amp into overdrive in the loop. Really its all up to personal preference. I put some effects in front of the amp and some in the loop. It's all what you want things to sound like and what you're happy with. Try experimenting.
|
evL
Joined: Oct 13, 2015
Posts: 85
Crab Key
|

Posted on Nov 03 2015 09:57 PM
-
Last edited: Dec 18, 2015 02:40:51
|
matt
Joined: Oct 18, 2010
Posts: 656
Boston, MA
|

Posted on Nov 04 2015 11:45 AM
I look forward to experimenting! until then, I'll probably continue to ignore the loop...
— Matt Heaton & the Electric Heaters
Boston's Premier Surf/Noir Combo
http://www.heatonsurf.com
|
Ariel
Joined: Aug 29, 2009
Posts: 1556
Israel
|

Posted on Nov 05 2015 01:56 PM
Yep, exactly what KBK did.
It's like 90's hi-fi receivers that allow you to insert a corrective EQ module before the power amp Other than that, think "The Edge"
Last edited: Nov 05, 2015 13:58:57
|
JObeast
Joined: Jul 24, 2012
Posts: 2762
Finknabad, Squinkistan
|

Posted on Nov 05 2015 08:00 PM
Having too many choices is not a good thing. Above 12, more is less. Think of it this way: most classic sounds were the only ones available with extant gear. Less IS more.
DreadInBabylon wrote:
Yep, exactly what KBK did.
It's like 90's hi-fi receivers that allow you to insert a corrective EQ module before the power amp Other than that, think "The Edge" 
— Squink Out!
|