Photo of the Day
Shoutbox

SHADOWNIGHT5150: I like big reverb and i cannot lie
256 days ago

SHADOWNIGHT5150: Bank accounts are a scam created by a shadow government
256 days ago

sysmalakian: TODAY IS MY BIRTHDAY!
242 days ago

dp: dude
223 days ago

Bango_Rilla: Shout Bananas!!
178 days ago

BillyBlastOff: See you kiddies at the Convention!
162 days ago

GDW: showman
114 days ago

Emilien03: https://losg...
35 days ago

Pyronauts: Happy Tanks-Kicking!!!
29 days ago

glennmagi: CLAM SHACK guitar
15 days ago

Please login or register to shout.

Current Polls

No polls at this time. Check out our past polls.

Current Contests

No contests at this time. Check out our past contests.

Donations

Help us meet our monthly goal:

100%

100%

Donate Now

Cake December Birthdays Cake
SG101 Banner

SurfGuitar101 Forums » Gear »

Permalink '63 Reissue Fender Tube Reverb - Demo of 3 different Reverb pans

New Topic
Goto Page: Previous 1 2 3 Next

I had a big surprise with my tank. My MIK pan arrived and I installed it only to find the reverb was very weak. It had a nice drip but I had to max the mix to 9 or 10 to get what I normally get at 5 or 6. I put the old pan back in. On removing the old pan I was surprised to see 3 springs and the model number is 9AB3C1B, which I believe is the wrong pan for a reverb unit, but it sounds better to me. What the hell, I'm completely baffled. I think I'll stop messing with it and just play.

I just got the MIK Accutronics pan and absolutly love it. It has the best drip compared to MOD, TAD, MIA Accutronics and some Gibbs ones.

http://www.reverbnation.com/bangmustang
http://www.facebook.com/bangmustang
https://soundcloud.com/bang-mustang

LaFleur wrote:

I just got the MIK Accutronics pan and absolutly love it. It has the best drip compared to MOD, TAD, MIA Accutronics and some Gibbs ones.

It seems that the wave of opinion is changing little by little about the MIK Accu. I think this is really cool because there seemed to be a conundrum with players that stayed away from the MIK on reputation but were a bit let down with the MOD - not with the quality but with the longer decay. Really, at $20-ish, there is little reason to avoid the MIK...if nothing else, it would serve as a backup pan when heading out for gigs. In guitarland, players will spend more than 10x that amount just to see if something could possibly work for them. $20 is chump-change considering how much a few packages of guitar strings and a handful of picks/plectra cost.
Also, for me, this reduces GASsing for the TAD from Germany (i.e. the total out-of-pocket cost including expensive shipping and currency exchg).

Lorne
The Surf Shakers: https://www.facebook.com/TheSurfShakers
Vancouver BC Canada

Stormtiger wrote:

I had a big surprise with my tank. My MIK pan arrived and I installed it only to find the reverb was very weak. It had a nice drip but I had to max the mix to 9 or 10 to get what I normally get at 5 or 6. I put the old pan back in. On removing the old pan I was surprised to see 3 springs and the model number is 9AB3C1B, which I believe is the wrong pan for a reverb unit, but it sounds better to me. What the hell, I'm completely baffled. I think I'll stop messing with it and just play.

Yeah, that is baffling - there is no way that I would consider the MIK to be weak at middle settings. Is the new MIK pan the 4AB3C1C (vertical mount) or the 4AB3C1B (horizontal) ?
At the end of the day, though, it's all about what you are happy with so your old pan seems to scratch that itch. I cannot help but think that you either have a defective unit, you need to swap the In/Out RCA connectors (I had to do that, btw, with both my MOD and my MIK Accu relative to my stock MIA Accu) or that you do not have the correct part number for the MIK.
Don't worry, connecting the 'wrong' RCA connectors in itself is not going to damage anything but it sure doesn't help with the sound! - it is also a common thing that players have to do even though it seems counter-intuitive.

Lorne
The Surf Shakers: https://www.facebook.com/TheSurfShakers
Vancouver BC Canada

Yes the new MIK pan is 4AB3C1C. The input and output jacks are marked on the pan but reversed from the old pan, I reversed the cables so input cable goes to input jack, etc. My old pan appears to be a horizontal mount, what! I may give it another try and switch the cables and make sure I didn't leave the foam block in touching the springs. I hadn't know about the foam block before, I understand it should be glued to the baffle, my old one fell off when I removed the pan. I'll have to face the fact that I have a mutant reverb unit but it sounds pretty good anyway.

I think there's no escape from personal experience here, everything is so specific, everyone's setup is different. The pans are delicate mechanical units, that rely on magnetic suspension and a matrix of tiny springs... The tolerances are minimal. The most common complaint I read here, and all over the internet, regarding any spring reverb unit of any kind, has to do with the pan itself. Stormtiger, it might just be that another MK one, exactly the same, would sound really different. Not that it's broken, it's the nature of the beast.
One thing we forgot to establish in these threads, is what we are comparing to? What's the base line? Dick Dale and Astronauts? Fine by me! Because the 3 spring sound is initially something very different...

After a few test days I can say that the MIK pan has absolutly the best drip of all those pans. Unfortunately the tail is not that good sounding. The tail isn't too long, but the room isn't the best sounding one(the tail/room on the MOD sounded good but was too long) But I don't care as I use it for drip Very Happy
Why couldn't anyone put the good things of the MIK and MOD together and build the ultimate pan... Stir the Pot

http://www.reverbnation.com/bangmustang
http://www.facebook.com/bangmustang
https://soundcloud.com/bang-mustang

Last edited: Feb 12, 2015 11:04:56

So... would all this apply similarly to the reverb pan/circuit in a COMBO? Because I recently switched out the stock Fender Accu (no idea if it's MIK, I assume so) with a MOD pan, and heard ZERO difference. I'm wondering if maybe swapping the reverb send/driver would make any difference.... or if this stuff applies to outboard reverb differently than onboard reverb?

FWIW, it's a Super-sonic 22.

You guys must all be good with wiring, electrical components, etc... Isn't it difficult to change out a pan? Isn't it possible to get shocked pretty badly?

MooreLoud.com - A tribute to Dick Dale. New Singles "Finish Line" and "Paradiso" on Bandcamp and website.

SixStringSurfer wrote:

You guys must all be good with wiring, electrical components, etc... Isn't it difficult to change out a pan? Isn't it possible to get shocked pretty badly?

I am a complete novice with electrical projects. Changing out a pan is one of the easiest and safest modifications.
The only requirement is to unplug the electrical cable and turn the unit off. The reverb pan is NOT powered - it simply has In/Out RCA connector cables which only carries audio. Disconnect those two RCAs from the pan. This can be done once the unit's electrical cable is unplugged or once the following steps are done:

In a typical Fender Reverb unit, the front panel (with the grill cloth) has four screws that fasten the panel to the inner frame of the reverb unit.
Once these 4 screws are removed, the panel is free and gives access to the vertically-suspended pan attached to it. That pan is suspended by small utility springs to anchor posts on that front panel of the reverb unit. Unhook those 4 springs and Voila, the tank is completely detached from the unit.

Lorne
The Surf Shakers: https://www.facebook.com/TheSurfShakers
Vancouver BC Canada

Last edited: Feb 12, 2015 17:17:56

Hi shake_n_stomp, thanks for the reply. I am surprised to hear it's not a huge deal to swap out the pans. I hate to ask, but if it's not too much trouble could you possibly upload some pics (I dare not ask for a video!) the next time you do a swap? If not, I totally understand. Thanks again for the reply. Smile

MooreLoud.com - A tribute to Dick Dale. New Singles "Finish Line" and "Paradiso" on Bandcamp and website.

SixStringSurfer wrote:

Hi shake_n_stomp, thanks for the reply. I am surprised to hear it's not a huge deal to swap out the pans. I hate to ask, but if it's not too much trouble could you possibly upload some pics (I dare not ask for a video!) the next time you do a swap? If not, I totally understand. Thanks again for the reply. Smile

Better yet, here is something that was already uploaded to Youtube that I benefited from prior to doing my own pan swaps...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=g0n8_kT5Wi4

Lorne
The Surf Shakers: https://www.facebook.com/TheSurfShakers
Vancouver BC Canada

Why couldn't I find that? Laughing Thanks man.

MooreLoud.com - A tribute to Dick Dale. New Singles "Finish Line" and "Paradiso" on Bandcamp and website.

Update: I tried the MIK pan again and this time, I DID NOT switch the cables despite the labels on the pan and now it sounds great. Very nice drip, much closer to the vintage tank I sometimes use. I am really happy with the MIK pan now and I am comforted knowing I now have the correct pan for the unit, and mystified as to how the wrong pan got in there but all is for the best in this best of all possible worlds.

Stormtiger wrote:

Update: I tried the MIK pan again and this time, I DID NOT switch the cables despite the labels on the pan and now it sounds great. Very nice drip, much closer to the vintage tank I sometimes use. I am really happy with the MIK pan now and I am comforted knowing I now have the correct pan for the unit, and mystified as to how the wrong pan got in there but all is for the best in this best of all possible worlds.

Hey, cool.
Glad that everything worked out for you. That RCA cable switcheroo thing is a nuisance.

Lorne
The Surf Shakers: https://www.facebook.com/TheSurfShakers
Vancouver BC Canada

I have finally found the sound that I have been chasing! I kept asking myself, how does shake n stomp get that "lush" or "woosh" sound that I like so much? Well, I just bought a '65 Fender Reverb Deluxe RI, hooked my '63 tank up to it, and BOOM, I got "that sound!" You guys will think I am nuts, but I turn the dwell and mix up to 10, tone to 6, and turn the reverb on the amp up to about 4.

I know, I am using way too much reverb, but I love it! To be clear, I don't keep the settings like this at all times. Often, I turn the amp reverb down to 1, and set the tank to 8 8 6. Anyway, I just thought I would share my experience. To each his own, right? Big Grin

MooreLoud.com - A tribute to Dick Dale. New Singles "Finish Line" and "Paradiso" on Bandcamp and website.

Dwell, mix, and tone will vary with each unit... wildly vary in instances. I also really like the idea of adding some slight onboard reverb. It really fills out the sound if you aren't running the amp hotly.

I vary between running the dwell high and the mix low and the dwell low and the mix high. Depends on the room!

SixStringSurfer wrote:

I have finally found the sound that I have been chasing! I kept asking myself, how does shake n stomp get that "lush" or "woosh" sound that I like so much? Well, I just bought a '65 Fender Reverb Deluxe RI, hooked my '63 tank up to it, and BOOM, I got "that sound!" You guys will think I am nuts, but I turn the dwell and mix up to 10, tone to 6, and turn the reverb on the amp up to about 4.

I know, I am using way too much reverb, but I love it! To be clear, I don't keep the settings like this at all times. Often, I turn the amp reverb down to 1, and set the tank to 8 8 6. Anyway, I just thought I would share my experience. To each his own, right? Big Grin

Indeed. There are no rules. If there were rules, this wouldn't be so fun.
The whole thing with dialing it at 6-6-6 should never be regarded as the only acceptable way to run a reverb unit. This is just a half-decent starting point.

Lorne
The Surf Shakers: https://www.facebook.com/TheSurfShakers
Vancouver BC Canada

Stormtiger wrote:

I had a big surprise with my tank. My MIK pan arrived and I installed it only to find the reverb was very weak. It had a nice drip but I had to max the mix to 9 or 10 to get what I normally get at 5 or 6. I put the old pan back in. On removing the old pan I was surprised to see 3 springs and the model number is 9AB3C1B, which I believe is the wrong pan for a reverb unit, but it sounds better to me. What the hell, I'm completely baffled. I think I'll stop messing with it and just play.

FWIW, I just put an old [80's] Cary Illinois gold 3 spring Accutronics [4AB3C1B] tank in my re-issue.Huge improvement for the better.Way more than any of the n.o.s tube swaps that I tried.It's deeper, more 3D and less harsh at the same time. However, this arrived today-
http://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/Reverb-Can-Unit-Spring-Type-/151708588771?ssPageName=STRK%3AMEBIDX%3AIT&_trksid=p2047675.l2557&nma=true&si=zTODXu07gCJaBZsr3NzojRLnFT4%253D&orig_cvip=true&rt=nc

And like the 3 Bears this one is perfect. Its a 4BB3A1B and honestly looks identical to the stock pan [except for the gold color]. But it sounds ALOT better than the stock tank, more lush, deep and a bit quicker decay.
So I'll be selling the 3 springer [actually its 6 springs]

Last edited: Jun 24, 2015 05:08:14

Stormtiger wrote:

Yes the new MIK pan is 4AB3C1C. The input and output jacks are marked on the pan but reversed from the old pan, I reversed the cables so input cable goes to input jack, etc. My old pan appears to be a horizontal mount, what! I may give it another try and switch the cables and make sure I didn't leave the foam block in touching the springs. I hadn't know about the foam block before, I understand it should be glued to the baffle, my old one fell off when I removed the pan. I'll have to face the fact that I have a mutant reverb unit but it sounds pretty good anyway.

When I was doing the pan swap,I noticed my foam block was hanging by a thread so everybody should check that when your in there.Also, why did Fender choose such short and wimpy RCA/cinch cable? I put some beefier .5m ones in mine.

Goto Page: Previous 1 2 3 Next
Top