crumble
Joined: Sep 09, 2008
Posts: 3158
Guildford England
|
Posted on Sep 28 2014 03:35 PM
surferjoemusic wrote:
So ALL OF YOU in this thread love Quilter amps I assume..., no?!?!?
Looking at one of your recent videos using the Quilter Tone Block I'm utterly impressed.
bjoish wrote:
Quilter seems interesting!
I wonder if I can find any shops here that have them...
http://www.jazzisten.dk/QUILTER looks to be the only European dealer at the moment.
|
DonBale
Joined: Feb 24, 2014
Posts: 156
|
Posted on Sep 28 2014 03:43 PM
Recently on FB popped out add stating something like "Quilter amps $20 flat shipping anywhere in EU", didn't check out, not sure if true but for those interested, check it out
.
— Not surf but you might like it:
http://donbale.bandcamp.com/
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCA0g6Sn3e9FULMN0owd9YGw
https://soundcloud.com/fatalamanga
|
JObeast
Joined: Jul 24, 2012
Posts: 2762
Finknabad, Squinkistan
|
Posted on Sep 29 2014 10:36 PM
The MOD pan came today from Antique Electronic Supply, and I demo'ed the Accutronics pan, which sounded good at first but after 'warming up' (???someone explain this) started fuzzing out again. I feared maybe the FET unit was doing something weird after IT warmed up... but switching out the old for the new pan, I entered pristine reverb nirvana, without a trace of fuzz, and it stayed clean at every setting. MOD pan a lot more gainy; with longer tails (I miss the Accutronics sound, actually)
So, problem solved and reverb up to snuff! I may try replacing the pan on the vintage Gibson SS Reverb III to see if its sonics are improved, now that I hear how much improved the effect is with a fresh pan. I recently spent more than $100 recapping the old thing; worth another $20 to try to tune it up further.
ludobag wrote:
how do you set up it ?
cause if with 5 5 5 or 6 6 6 you have fuzz it is probably the pan
even on my little vox who crunch very easy ,the reverb don't crunch at all
stratdancer ,it is not surf at all !
— Squink Out!
Last edited: Sep 29, 2014 22:53:16
|
sonni
Joined: Nov 08, 2006
Posts: 80
Vienna, Austria
|
Posted on Sep 30 2014 09:18 AM
bjoish wrote:
Since the Tone-Mix-circuit is identical, this volume-loss effect when using a foot switch should be about the same. The balance between the dry and wet signal depends on the settings of the controls (Dwell/Tone/Mix).
With this old circuit it seems difficult avoid some volume (or tone) change.
tubeswell once proposed possible mods against the volume-drop of the fender reverb (the first one sounds easy, sort of a pot with a treble-bleed somewhere...)
do you think that could also work for the FET-reverb?
tubeswell wrote:
so if it's problematic to boost the wet signal at the
Reverb Recovery section, maybe it would be easy
possible to lower the dry signal a little?
One way of doing this in the 6G15 circuit would be a voltage divider between the bypass stage's output coupling cap and the mixing control. If you were seriously considering that, you should use a 500k-1M (audio taper) pot so you can experiment with the amount of dry signal reduction. You also may want to put a bright cap across the input-wiper lug of any such pot (if you did this) so you keep the highs when the pot is in 'cut' mode. It would be more of a PITA to implement because you need a space to mount the pot etc.
Another way would be to reconfigure the CF (bypass) stage to have a lower output. In the 6G15 circuit the CF stage is fixed bias, so if you decreased the cathode resistor (to say something like 56k - I wouldn't go any lower with a 12AX7 stage because it will run too hot otherwise), you would also want to change both of the (2M2) bias resistors, so that the grid was biased properly w.r.t. the cathode voltage. (Another way of dealing with the biasing would be to convert the CF stage to cathode-bias, by removing the both the 2M2 resistors and putting a 1k bias resistor between the cathode and the (new - lower value) cathode resistor, and putting in a 470k-1M grid load resistor from the grid to the junction of the new bias resistor and cathode resistor. This would make the biasing of the CF stage automatic, and you could experiment a bit more with cathode resistor values. But I would keep an eye on the h-k voltage and the tube current - to keep within 12AX7 'spec').
In any event, you may or may not like the result. Most peeps just live with the (dry/wet) difference anyhow.
|
ludobag
Joined: Jun 05, 2010
Posts: 620
at south of
|
Posted on Sep 30 2014 11:35 AM
i have completely skip the bypass button cause the fet verb is in my sound
i don't want to know how it sound without
cause it is always engaged maybe if i want less reverb i will descrease the pot but it is a part of my sound (i play surf of course!!and even if i would like to play something else i let in the circuit)
if you want no effect when off on your sound you must wire it with a 3pdt like a pedal
true bypass approch it is not really hard to do, you need a swicth to make a switching betwenn the in and the out ,first position to fet reverb in ,the second the in to out directly by a wire ,with a 3 pdt you will have the switching of led too ,with dpdt no light
Last edited: Sep 30, 2014 11:39:34
|
sonni
Joined: Nov 08, 2006
Posts: 80
Vienna, Austria
|
Posted on Sep 30 2014 01:20 PM
the need is the following: if you ever turn off the reverb, you don't want the dry signal to be louder than the reverb, but that's the way it usually is. for me, it should be the other way round, of course!
|
bjoish
Joined: Jul 06, 2010
Posts: 596
Stockholm
|
Posted on Sep 30 2014 02:15 PM
sonni wrote:
tubeswell once proposed possible mods against the volume-drop of the fender reverb (the first one sounds easy, sort of a pot with a treble-bleed somewhere...)
do you think that could also work for the FET-reverb?
tubeswell wrote:
so if it's problematic to boost the wet signal at the
Reverb Recovery section, maybe it would be easy
possible to lower the dry signal a little?
One way of doing this in the 6G15 circuit would be a voltage divider between the bypass stage's output coupling cap and the mixing control. If you were seriously considering that, you should use a 500k-1M (audio taper) pot so you can experiment with the amount of dry signal reduction. You also may want to put a bright cap across the input-wiper lug of any such pot (if you did this) so you keep the highs when the pot is in 'cut' mode. It would be more of a PITA to implement because you need a space to mount the pot etc.
Another way would be to reconfigure the CF (bypass) stage to have a lower output. In the 6G15 circuit the CF stage is fixed bias, so if you decreased the cathode resistor (to say something like 56k - I wouldn't go any lower with a 12AX7 stage because it will run too hot otherwise), you would also want to change both of the (2M2) bias resistors, so that the grid was biased properly w.r.t. the cathode voltage. (Another way of dealing with the biasing would be to convert the CF stage to cathode-bias, by removing the both the 2M2 resistors and putting a 1k bias resistor between the cathode and the (new - lower value) cathode resistor, and putting in a 470k-1M grid load resistor from the grid to the junction of the new bias resistor and cathode resistor. This would make the biasing of the CF stage automatic, and you could experiment a bit more with cathode resistor values. But I would keep an eye on the h-k voltage and the tube current - to keep within 12AX7 'spec').
Maybe you should try a trimpot instead of the cathod/source resistor.
Then you can lower the dry signal to match the wet. But the next time you adjust Dwell/Mix/Tone you might also need to adjust the trimpot again...
Not so fun, I suppose.
|
BJB
Joined: Jul 28, 2008
Posts: 413
|
Posted on Sep 30 2014 04:52 PM
That would work. Essentially, it gives you full control of both the dry and wet signals. It doesn't address the problem of losing highs in the dry signal path, but that's not necessarily a bad thing.
Years ago, I experimented with a treble-bleed approach to solving the dry signal treble loss inherent to the 6G15 reverb circuit. It can be made to work, but the treble-bleed for the dry signal path becomes a treble-suck for the wet signal path. The result is a huge loss of reverb! So yes, you can fix one problem but you will create a much worse problem that makes the tank utterly useless.
The Fender mixer circuit is really quite primitive and terrible, so I tried a very transparent mixer circuit that had no tone suck whatsoever. The reverb was very clear and the dry signal was perfect! Most people would have thought it was great reverb but it simply was not the surf reverb I was looking for. It turns out some tone suck is a good thing and the high-frequency losses inherent to the awful 6G15 mixer circuit are part of its character.
After these experiments, I don't believe a surf reverb unit can be built unless it has the same flaws as the original. Perhaps the various digital pedals don't sound right because the designers know about the flaws and want to fix them, but the result gives too many highs (icepick reverb). This is why the Surfy Bear reverb works so well; it has the authentic flaws so it sounds more authentic than the digital pedals. So even if you could fix the shortcomings of the Fender reverb circuit, there is a serious risk of losing the surf reverb that we are used to hearing.
— If it ain't broke, fix it until it is.
Last edited: Sep 30, 2014 16:56:08
|
Ariel
Joined: Aug 29, 2009
Posts: 1556
Israel
|
Posted on Sep 30 2014 06:41 PM
Great insights, BJB!
BJB wrote:
The Fender mixer circuit is really quite primitive and terrible;
I don't believe a surf reverb unit can be built unless it has the same flaws as the original.
Those two statements alone should be pinned somewhere.
Classic Taoist poetry.
Perhaps the various digital pedals don't sound right because the designers know about the flaws and want to fix them, but the result gives too many highs (icepick reverb).
With my setup, everything maxed out on the Topanga sounds about as icepick-y as FRV-1 on 4-4-4, they tried to compensate it the other way; the infidels.
What they need are testers that actually play Surf music regularly and know more than Pipeline. Catalinbread's philosophy is to please and appeal to as many crowds as it can, while the Roland machines do with their own crazy special ways.
Though I don't believe somehow injecting the volume difference of the original circuit into an emulation would to any good to anybody... They don't follow it that closely anyway...
This is why the Surfy Bear reverb works so well; ...
It does! Big open sound, beautiful at whatever setting. I'm kinda getting with Ludobag on this, why turn it off indeed?
I also true-bypassed mine, just because. Clean and complete solution.
image
Last edited: Sep 30, 2014 19:12:43
|
bjoish
Joined: Jul 06, 2010
Posts: 596
Stockholm
|
Posted on Oct 01 2014 05:59 AM
Very well written BJB !!
DreadInBabylon wrote:
I also true-bypassed mine, just because. Clean and complete solution.
Yes, that is always nice.
BTW, I have ordered the stickers. But the company I ordered from is very slow and asks a lot of questions. I wonder if this is the first time they print stickers
|
crumble
Joined: Sep 09, 2008
Posts: 3158
Guildford England
|
Posted on Oct 01 2014 06:24 AM
bjoish wrote:
BTW, I have ordered the stickers. But the company I ordered from is very slow and asks a lot of questions. I wonder if this is the first time they print stickers
Oddly enough I watched the process of making stickers on youtube last week (I was bored) I thought it would be just a case of printing them out but it's actually quite a skilled process!
|
crumble
Joined: Sep 09, 2008
Posts: 3158
Guildford England
|
Posted on Oct 01 2014 06:45 AM
Just ordered Surfy Bear FET Reverb and really looking forward trying it out. I have already built a tube 6G15 clone but I'm not confident of wiring it and getting someone to do the work will cost as much or even more than the SB FET. I can trade the parts off to recoup some of my loss but ultimately I just feel safer with a reverb unit based on 12volts.
|
JObeast
Joined: Jul 24, 2012
Posts: 2762
Finknabad, Squinkistan
|
Posted on Oct 01 2014 09:46 PM
Great mod idea, Dread! I may give it a shot. Still in 'always-on' mode at this point...
DreadInBabylon wrote:
Great insights, BJB!
BJB wrote:
The Fender mixer circuit is really quite primitive and terrible;
I don't believe a surf reverb unit can be built unless it has the same flaws as the original.
Those two statements alone should be pinned somewhere.
Classic Taoist poetry.
Perhaps the various digital pedals don't sound right because the designers know about the flaws and want to fix them, but the result gives too many highs (icepick reverb).
With my setup, everything maxed out on the Topanga sounds about as icepick-y as FRV-1 on 4-4-4, they tried to compensate it the other way; the infidels.
What they need are testers that actually play Surf music regularly and know more than Pipeline. Catalinbread's philosophy is to please and appeal to as many crowds as it can, while the Roland machines do with their own crazy special ways.
Though I don't believe somehow injecting the volume difference of the original circuit into an emulation would to any good to anybody... They don't follow it that closely anyway...
This is why the Surfy Bear reverb works so well; ...
It does! Big open sound, beautiful at whatever setting. I'm kinda getting with Ludobag on this, why turn it off indeed?
I also true-bypassed mine, just because. Clean and complete solution.
image
— Squink Out!
|
JObeast
Joined: Jul 24, 2012
Posts: 2762
Finknabad, Squinkistan
|
Posted on Oct 03 2014 07:37 PM
In regard to shimming the transformers of old reverb pans to get new life out of them, I did that just now to my Gibson Reverb III's Gibbs pan and it appears to have solved the distortion problem! The trannies were horribly loose and floppin' all over the place before, but now they are stable and there is a noticeable improvement in reverb fidelity.
That being said, the Surfy Bear FET Reverb has the Gibson circuit beat all to hell in terms of tone. Last night I jammed my '65 Jaguar through the FET Reverb and my Gibson GA20T and it sounded raw and awesome. No need of a dirt pedal with that combo! By comparison, the vintage Gibson Reverb unit just plugs along with no verve or funkiness. Not very inspiring. Glad to have spent $120 on a new authentic reverb unit!
— Squink Out!
Last edited: Oct 03, 2014 19:38:28
|
stratdancer
Joined: Dec 11, 2013
Posts: 2533
Akron, Ohio
|
Posted on Oct 03 2014 09:25 PM
I love mine. Like someone said earlier, Bjourn deserves the nobel prize for creating authentic tank mojo for less than synthesized pedal cost.
— The Kahuna Kings
https://www.facebook.com/pages/The-Kahuna-Kings/459752090818447
https://thekahunakings.bandcamp.com/releases
Last edited: Oct 03, 2014 21:26:05
|
Jason
Joined: Aug 29, 2008
Posts: 245
Los Angeles, CA
|
Posted on Oct 03 2014 09:42 PM
I am truly impressed with this device! I own 3 all original 1965 Fender Reverb Units and this device comes the closest I have heard to emulating the magic of those. Great stuff Bjorn!
I have installed the circuit in its own aluminum enclosure (the same enclosure used by DreadInBabylon) to take along as a backup in case the circuitry in a vintage unit fails at a show. I would then just connect the pan in the vintage unit to the Surfy Bear and I'd be back up and running (assuming the pan wasn't what failed in the vintage unit)!
Anyways, here are a couple of shots of the finished product:
— The Counselors
Last edited: Feb 02, 2015 03:04:57
|
cambeezy
Joined: Jun 26, 2007
Posts: 399
Cleveland, Ohio
|
Posted on Oct 03 2014 10:05 PM
The "You've Got Reverb" Tank
I'm thinking of building a Surfy Bear and putting it inside a freakin' plastic mailbox
The board should fit on the inside of the door and, being plastic, there should be no short-circuit problems. Easy enough to add a luggage-style handle. What really sells me on the idea is that the box is "US Postmaster General Approved".
Gotta loose that flag, tho.
Last edited: Oct 03, 2014 22:07:11
|
JObeast
Joined: Jul 24, 2012
Posts: 2762
Finknabad, Squinkistan
|
Posted on Oct 03 2014 10:32 PM
At least use a vintage metal mailbox. There are some nice ones out there. Better shielding.
— Squink Out!
|
crumble
Joined: Sep 09, 2008
Posts: 3158
Guildford England
|
Posted on Oct 08 2014 09:43 AM
Hi Bjorn. I received your beautiful FET Reverb board yesterday thank you.
I am fitting it to a ready made chrome Mojo USA chassis and of course none of your pots & sockets fit because the holes are American standard (too big). It isn't a problem because I have most of the correct sized parts already.
But I notice you use RCA Sockets with insulated washers which my replacement part doesn't have. Question. Does it matter if the RCA Sockets are earthed to the chassis? Thanks.
|
bjoish
Joined: Jul 06, 2010
Posts: 596
Stockholm
|
Posted on Oct 08 2014 03:52 PM
Hi Malc
There is a small risk for hum problems if you ground the chassis several points.
Try the replacement parts, if you get hum problems you can add the insulation washers!
/Björn
|