Photo of the Day
Shoutbox

midwestsurfguy: Merry Christmas!
327 days ago

sysmalakian: HAPPY NEW YEAR!
321 days ago

SabedLeepski: Surfin‘ Europe, for surf (related) gigs and events in Europe Big Razz https://sunb...
282 days ago

SHADOWNIGHT5150: I like big reverb and i cannot lie
215 days ago

SHADOWNIGHT5150: Bank accounts are a scam created by a shadow government
215 days ago

sysmalakian: TODAY IS MY BIRTHDAY!
201 days ago

dp: dude
182 days ago

Bango_Rilla: Shout Bananas!!
137 days ago

BillyBlastOff: See you kiddies at the Convention!
121 days ago

GDW: showman
72 days ago

Please login or register to shout.

Current Polls

No polls at this time. Check out our past polls.

Current Contests

No contests at this time. Check out our past contests.

Donations

Help us meet our monthly goal:

43%

43%

Donate Now

SG101 Banner

SurfGuitar101 Forums » Gear »

Permalink Squier Vintage Modified Bass VI

New Topic
Goto Page: Previous 1 219 20 21 22 2331 32 Next

They are just starting to get these things! I held off for a long time, not sure why. I think the Pawn Shop one really put me off of wanted a VI. But, I'm super happy to get one. Several people here got one within a week of each other and my good buddy is getting one(gratis... for blogging mine!) this week.

I think there is some really great music to be made with these instruments yet. Just listen to a Cure song or that Cocteau Twins song, where two VIs kind of just gently jam together. Jamming is the wrong word, more creating a cohesive atmosphere.

I'm really excited to get mine into a band context. The great things that could be accomplished with the 'limitation' of two to three VIs... To the lay person, they would have no idea what was going on, that is the beauty of it.

Listening to this video again, found it on an early page in this thread. I have decent monitors hooked up to my desktop computer and this sounds absolutely amazing: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aNBJ1rBAlN8

I'll admit what Robert is doin is pretty cool,
But it's very guitarish sounding.
My favorite part of that song is the real bass part.

Jeff(bigtikidude)

I was a fan of both the Cure and Cocteau Twins, even though I couldn't understand a word she sung. I like the guitar-playing and they used off-sets all the time.

Matt "tha Kat" Lentz
Skippy and the Skipjacks: 2018-2020
Skippyandtheskipjacks.net
https://www.facebook.com/skippyandtheskipjacks
Otto and the Ottomans: 2014-2015
The Coconauts surf band: 2009-2014
www.theamazingcoconauts.com
Group Captain and the Mandrakes 2013
http://www.gcmband.com/
The Surfside IV: 2002-2005, 2008-2009
the Del-Vamps: 1992-1999, 2006-2007
http://www.dblcrown.com/delvamps.html

I play my 90s MIJ VI that I bought new all the time. Squiers are much better.

If your band has a keyboard player and you are on bass, that's where a lot of possibilities open up.

I'm using my Bass VI in the five-piece combo I'm in to play the vocal melody (slow, moody) parts in songs such as Besame Mucho, Shadow of Your Smile, Charade and so on. The sonic range of this guitar, from lowest note to highest, and all the tones available with its' pickup combinations - creamy mellow to deep twang - combined with Reverb or Space Echo, is amazing.

I'm working on using its' vibrato bar to add a shimmering quality to my playing, but for some reason the tone gets slightly tinny when I use it, and the bar clanks when released. I think I will eventually have to upgrade the bridge and vibrato systems if the combo becomes a serious project. For now, I use the Bass VI on these songs with a Joyo Tremolo pedal (thanks for the tip, Noah) and I love the music it makes.

Also, while the switches aren't scratchy, they are noisy when changed, so I may need to do something about them, too. The "click" through the amp really distracts from the music in the quiet sections.

This is Noel. Reverb's at maximum an' I'm givin' 'er all she's got.

Noel wrote:

I'm working on using its' vibrato bar to add a shimmering quality to my playing, but for some reason the tone gets slightly tinny when I use it, and the bar clanks when released.

Noel, check if the strings touch the back of the bridge when you're using the trem and the bridge is rocking forward. You may have to raise the saddles a little.

Old punks never die... They just become surf rockers.

LeeVanCleef wrote:

Noel wrote:

I'm working on using its' vibrato bar to add a shimmering quality to my playing, but for some reason the tone gets slightly tinny when I use it, and the bar clanks when released.

Noel, check if the strings touch the back of the bridge when you're using the trem and the bridge is rocking forward. You may have to raise the saddles a little.

Thanks. We did yesterday, during a complete reset, and that's not it. But it does sound like a slight harmonic vibration that never quite becomes a buzz, it just goes "thin", like maybe a saddle slot isn't perfectly parallel? The clank from the slop in the collet, made by releasing the vibrato arm is more annoying.

And, we also noticed the high-E string is a bit too close to the edge of the fretboard. It slightly overlaps the binding, almost as if its' saddle was just a bit too wide. And that's also the string that gets most tinny when using the vibrato.

This is Noel. Reverb's at maximum an' I'm givin' 'er all she's got.

Last edited: Mar 21, 2014 11:53:07

Noel wrote:

Also, while the switches aren't scratchy, they are noisy when changed, so I may need to do something about them, too. The "click" through the amp really distracts from the music in the quiet sections.

Ugh.. the 90s reissue is horrendous. The switches flop around. At least the ones on my Squier Jag are tight and quiet. I assume they are the same on the VI.

Does the Squier VI have individual height saddles? or are they like the original and MIJ reissue. Only overall height. You may be on to something though.

Switches are very tight; they just "click" through the amp when thrown.

Unlike the saddles on my CIJ offsets, these have only a single groove down the middle. If they were like the others, I could just move the high-E string inward one groove and all would be perfect. Maybe I can use some saddles from my Jag on this guitar, as the Jag is currently wearing a StayTrem bridge?

As you can tell, I don't have La Bella flats on it yet. I'm waiting to decide how I really want the guitar ultimately setup, and with what upgraded parts, so I don't waste them on a temporary setup.

image

image

image

This is Noel. Reverb's at maximum an' I'm givin' 'er all she's got.

Last edited: Mar 21, 2014 15:04:23

Noel, what do use for an amp with this?

wfoguy wrote:

Noel, what do use for an amp with this?

I use a 160 WATT Fender Stage 112SE with it. I'd like to try the amp head with a nice 15 sometime.

This is Noel. Reverb's at maximum an' I'm givin' 'er all she's got.

I play mine through a Showman and single 15 tone ring and it really sounds great!

I was wondering if anyone else found these issues that I have.

  1. I'm replacing the nut.

  2. I initially thought I'd swap out the pickups, but have found that they actually are pretty decent.

  3. The Vibrato isn't as smooth as I'd like, working this one in.

  4. There was an issue with the bridge pickup being too high and the magnets throwing the strings out of tune from time to time, mostly the floppy low E. I took all of the springs from the back of the pickups and lowered them a bit more and the problem was solved. I will end up changing strings, but for now these work.

  5. I thought I'd be replacing the bridge as well, but I'm actually satisfied with it.

That said, I think this is a well-built machine. I'm interested as why So1om finds the Squier better than the CIJ 90s models. I played one of the Japanese 90s reissues a LONG time ago in a store when they were first introduced and I remembered thinking it was kind of "thin" sounding, but the Squier really does have me quite satisfied. Maybe the reasonable price on the Squier is what has me so satisfied???

Matt "tha Kat" Lentz
Skippy and the Skipjacks: 2018-2020
Skippyandtheskipjacks.net
https://www.facebook.com/skippyandtheskipjacks
Otto and the Ottomans: 2014-2015
The Coconauts surf band: 2009-2014
www.theamazingcoconauts.com
Group Captain and the Mandrakes 2013
http://www.gcmband.com/
The Surfside IV: 2002-2005, 2008-2009
the Del-Vamps: 1992-1999, 2006-2007
http://www.dblcrown.com/delvamps.html

1) The nut was the weakest link for me, replaced it immediately.
2) Yep! Keeping my pickups, unless opportunity for a cheap swap came up.
3) Thinking about replacing the trem eventually too (preferably an AVRI Fender with the StayTrem), but this has to be an opportunity too.
4) I left my pickup heights alone, but I do think the bridge is high, just not enough to worry about.
5) The bridge is probably completely fine, I just had a slightly sturdier one laying around collecting dust.

Mike
http://www.youtube.com/morphballio

Mike, I wanted to lower my bridge, so I came into that problem with the springs on the pickups. It was a really easy fix and now I have things adjusted nicely. I don't know why they put springs in there anyway.

Matt "tha Kat" Lentz
Skippy and the Skipjacks: 2018-2020
Skippyandtheskipjacks.net
https://www.facebook.com/skippyandtheskipjacks
Otto and the Ottomans: 2014-2015
The Coconauts surf band: 2009-2014
www.theamazingcoconauts.com
Group Captain and the Mandrakes 2013
http://www.gcmband.com/
The Surfside IV: 2002-2005, 2008-2009
the Del-Vamps: 1992-1999, 2006-2007
http://www.dblcrown.com/delvamps.html

Noel, that sounds like a really cool project! Indeed, the VI has this vocal quality to it, perfect for what you do.
If you have an extra bridge or saddles, preferably MIA, do the switch. You have enough good reasons. I didn't think it will change much on mine, but it absolutely did! That, with a change to your LaBella's will cure that thinness thing. Don't over think it, just let her sing!

Nut - I believe needs change - I ask again please, can anyone post a link to the specific Tusq nut that will be right for the Squier VI?
PU's - Still haven't heard them! Not with good strings that is. Can't judge yet, but all the different tones available sound good and distinct, I achieved a satisfactory height setup for now. PU adjustment is mandatory after anything, I would never call this an issue.
Strings - Circle K's I ordered should be here tomorrow. La Bella is also working on the next batch.
I'll shim the neck. Also open the trem, see what's up (and down). I'd love to replace the whole unit, but just try different springs first.

DreadInBabylon wrote:

Nut - I believe needs change - I ask again please, can anyone post a link to the specific Tusq nut that will be right for the Squier VI?

I used this one, the PQ-1600-00. It will drop the action, but I actually like it that way. It's not a direct replacement, as some shaving on the ends is probably desirable (especially the low E in my case). Resist the urge to buy the 6-string bass version, it actually is for a 6-string bass, so spacing is way too wide.

Mike
http://www.youtube.com/morphballio

Thanks a lot Mike! That's exactly what confused me.
I measured the current VI nut - it's about 42mm x 5mm x 3.5mm (sorry for speaking decimal). Close enough. How about the XL type?
Is the action low(er) because it's already slotted too deep? I may go with a blank then and cut it myself, since I like the current action, or even higher.

BTW, here's the AVRI bridge installed.

image
Hmmm I just realized: A guitar bridge produces ALL notes on the fretboard. The nut directly affects only 6. No question to what's more important.

Last edited: Mar 22, 2014 14:14:14

A friend who was more patient and persistent than me just received his Bass VI and he called me over to try it. It's pretty nice, but has several problems out of the box.

The nut, as already noted by others, is pretty terrible. It looks like it's been carved in a half-chewed chewing gum. Space between the strings is noticeably uneven.

The bridge isn't very good either. After a good setup, it didn't rattle, but the saddles did move around every time you try to bend a string or you strum too hard.

Bridge height is problematic too. To get a decent action, we originally had to lower it almost to the point where the baseplate would sit directly on the pickguard. Then we had to raise the saddles to prevent the strings from touching the back of the bridge.

I went back home to get an extra Mustang bridge I had lying about, and although the radius is incorrect (7.5"), the feel is much better. But the action is back to being too high. The neck will definitely need shimming to solve that problem, and a (good) Jazzmaster/Jaguar bridge would certainly work better than the wrong radius Mustang.

We haven't bothered with setting the intonation yet. The floppy low E string is pretty annoying and will need changing.

The vibrato worked pretty smoothly, no problem there. I don't think replacing it with a locking model would be that important, as chances of breaking a string are lower than on a guitar.

The pickups sound quite nice. We did notice that on the bridge pickup, the claw is backwards. Not sure if that's normal, or if it means the pickup is reversed, or if it's just the claw. The Fender website states the pickups are RWRP, will have to check that.

The neck is quite comfy. No fret buzz. The rosewood fretboard looks quite high quality. There's a spot on the tip of the headstock where the poly finish is rough, and if you look closely the edges of the headstock are not very well cut.

My friend chose the sunburst, and while the wood grain is very nice, the joints between the five pieces of wood are pretty visible. There's one knot on the top and three on the back. The burst itself is not bad, less red than it appeared in the pics other owners posted online. The tortoiseshell pattern is pretty crappy. I'm definitely not a "tortie snob", I'm even happy with the one on my CIJ Jag, but this is really bad.

So my friend is pretty disappointed with his Bass VI, especially considering how long he had to wait for it. He's thinking of selling it, and you know what? If the price is right, I might get tempted, despite the flaws.

Old punks never die... They just become surf rockers.

That's a pretty dead-on assessment, LeeVanCleef. I'd snatch it up if they can't see the potential and spend a little time fixing it up!

DreadInBabylon wrote:

Thanks a lot Mike! That's exactly what confused me.
I measured the current VI nut - it's about 42mm x 5mm x 3.5mm (sorry for speaking decimal). Close enough. How about the XL type?
Is the action low(er) because it's already slotted too deep? I may go with a blank then and cut it myself, since I like the current action, or even higher.

That could work. I did have to do some additional slot work on the low E, A and D, but the curved bottom is what dropped it from the beginning. I was actually a little worried, because I hadn't even filed the slots yet, but it turned out okay. I'd say if you got the flat-bottom pre-slotted TUSQ you might be able to keep more height.

Mike
http://www.youtube.com/morphballio

I think I'll do just that, thanks again. So as I understand, the slot on the VI is flat.

Last edited: Mar 22, 2014 17:41:23

Goto Page: Previous 1 219 20 21 22 2331 32 Next
Top