What is the better bang for the buck. I am seeing the Japan made ones going for about 700-800 and maerican ones going for about 1000-1200 for reissue. If i got a japanese one would i be disapointed with the quality compared to an american one?
SHADOWNIGHT5150:
I like big reverb and i cannot lie
256 days ago
SHADOWNIGHT5150:
Bank accounts are a scam created by a shadow government
256 days ago
sysmalakian:
TODAY IS MY BIRTHDAY!
242 days ago
dp:
dude
223 days ago
Bango_Rilla:
Shout Bananas!!
178 days ago
BillyBlastOff:
See you kiddies at the Convention!
162 days ago
GDW:
showman
113 days ago
Emilien03:
https://losg...
35 days ago
Pyronauts:
Happy Tanks-Kicking!!!
29 days ago
glennmagi:
CLAM SHACK guitar
14 days ago
#ShallowEnd is empty.
No polls at this time. Check out our past polls.
No contests at this time. Check out our past contests.
Joined: Nov 10, 2000 Posts: -180 |
What is the better bang for the buck. I am seeing the Japan made ones going for about 700-800 and maerican ones going for about 1000-1200 for reissue. If i got a japanese one would i be disapointed with the quality compared to an american one? |
Joined: Feb 26, 2006 Posts: 12159 Seattle |
You'd want to buy AV RI pickups for the Japanese Jag. I find my AV to be a better sounding guitar. The neck on my CIJ plays better, granted a neck on a previous CIJ didn't play as well since the necks were different. |
Joined: Nov 10, 2000 Posts: -180 |
thank you, i need more replys please. |
Joined: Mar 06, 2006 Posts: 306 seattle, wa |
You should talk to Bill from the Relunctant Aquanauts, I know he has an opinion on the subject of AV vs. CIJ jaguars. I would private message him, he may be a little relunctant (no pun intended) to chime in after the last time he talked about the subject. In my experience with Japanese vs. American reissue jazzmasters, the american definately seemed worth the extra 200-300 dollars. I played a Japanese jazzmaster for about six months before I was able to get an American reissue. I could tell when I first picked the guitar up out of the case that it was a better guitar. It just felt like it was better quality. That isn't much of an opinion to base on, but in my opinion, the tuners stay in tune better, the tremelo is stronger, and the electronics are better quality/sounding in the american guitars. I had upgraded my Japanese jazzmaster with American pickups and the American guitar which had the same pickups sounded better. All that is for jazzmasters, as in the only jaguars i have to compare are Jake's, and he could give you a better opinion on that than I can. The Japanese reissues are great guitars though, just the American ones are of better quality in my opinion, enough to spend the extra on getting a used American over a Japanese if you can afford it. I know i wasn't able to afford the American guitar when I was first looking for a Jazzmaster. -Eric New music! Also: |
Joined: Apr 23, 2006 Posts: 260 Oceanside, CA |
I just picked up a middle '90's MIJ Jaguar and I couldn't be happpier. My only gripe is that I don't how adjust the tension on the Vibrato bar to keep it from swinging while I am moving around. Any tips or suggestions from anyone? On my G&L, I would the tension screw just tight enough that I could push the bar away when needed but be able to set into a ready position so I wouldn't have to go fishing for it. Redd Tyde |
Joined: Feb 27, 2006 Posts: 1054 Chicago IL. |
Ha thanks Eric! I would surely recommend the AV over the CIJ or MIJ. I had a CIJ that I used on our album, at that point it was stock and alright, I then upgraded the pots and pickups and had to get a case for it. So thats like 250 bucks right there, and not that it was a bad guitar to begin with. If you keep your import stock and don't throw money into it I think they are OK deals. But, if you can find an AV used for under a grand it's a better deal. Your getting a better bridge, a better trem, a nice looking nitro finish, the mute, a case, and whatever is left of the case candy, and also a slab neck(which is debatable whether that's better or not). Both of my AV Jaguars sound better than my CIJ did acoustically, and that's because they are not entombed in a plastic finish. For some reason it's very rewarding to take my olympic white AV out of the case and see the finish yellowing. It also feels like a good quality American guitar should. But, if your looking to dabble in the Jaguar territory go with an import. That is where I started and it just turned into an obsession which I had to have something better. Not that I really disagree with Jacob, but I think the AV neck feels much better than my CIJ did. My early AV has a really slim neck, which I didn't like at first, but it feels like every vintage Jag I've played. My later AV has a really fat neck for a Jaguar, I think Fender tried to make the later AVs more strat-user friendly, and I don't mean strat-user in the terms of our own Ivan of the Madeira, but more like the SRV guys who have the extra money to spend on another Fender guitar other than a Strat. —"as he stepped into the stealthy night air... little did he know the fire escape was not there" https://www.facebook.com/reluctantaquanauts/ |
Joined: Feb 27, 2006 Posts: 2063 Virginia, USA |
There are 2 different types of Japanese Jags: The CIJ's are a little better construction, but I believe the pick-ups still need to be upgraded (I don't know I've never played a CIJ, but I used to own an MIJ.) I have an AV Jag and JM now and personally I'd recommend getting AV if you can get a good deal on one, just better all around. Although the MIJ's and CIJ's aren't horrible either. -Paul —Paul |
Joined: Feb 26, 2006 Posts: 12159 Seattle |
The reason I prefer the neck is because it is bound. It makes a different feel. I like the sharp edges over the slightly more rounded edges. The only gripe is that the nut width is a little smaller on the CIJ compared to the AV. My first CIJ's neck(non-bound) was not as good as the AV neck. |
Joined: Apr 20, 2006 Posts: 2054 |
...and buy the AV. You won't regret it. — |
Joined: Feb 25, 2006 Posts: 19286 Des Moines, Iowa, USA |
I can't help you compare MIJ vs AV RI, 'cause I haven't played a MIJ for more than 10 minutes, but I can say the AV RI's are AWESOME guitars if you have the cash. (Where's Dave W? ) —Site dude - S3 Agent #202 "It starts... when it begins" -- Ralf Kilauea |
Joined: Feb 26, 2006 Posts: 133 La Playa, Mexico |
I have now had both a CIJ Jazz and Jag, and just got an AVRI Jag. I also own a custom Jazzmaster that I made, using MIA Vintage Jazzmaster pups. My take is, both Japanese guitars were fine, but lacked mojo. Simply put, they were both very close, but no cigar. The MIA guitars have a nicer feel, and the nitrocellulose lacquer paint job alone is worth an extra $200. Little touches, like da nicer neck finish, original Fender mute, and a stronger tremelo spring, plus overall fit-and-finish give them a quality feel the Jap instruments simply don't match. That said, when you could get a Jap Jazzmaster for $400 from Musician's Friend, they were an incredible deal. Finally, people argue about MIJ/CIJ, but from a variety of sources who know Fender guitars, the guitars are not different. Fender Japan simply changed the decal because Crafted sounded better than Made. Obviously, they haven't done anything to dispel the myth, because it makes the CIJ designation more desireable to overseas markets. Gavin |
Joined: Feb 26, 2006 Posts: 12159 Seattle |
To me CIJ and MIJ feel different. Perhaps MIJ changed towards the end by the early MIJ's are nowhere near the CIJ quality. Metals seem different, wood is lighter(and dents like nobody's business). |
Joined: Feb 27, 2006 Posts: 2063 Virginia, USA |
I picked a CIJ up in a Guitar Center once when they were selling those red and blue ones and it felt a little better than my old MIJ. Correct me if I'm wrong, but I always thought the CIJ's were made with alder as opposed to basswood. My old MIJ would chip and dent if you just looked at it wrong. I dropped my AV the other day against a table, the table was dented, but the guitar - not a scratch. -Paul —Paul |
Joined: Feb 27, 2006 Posts: 1054 Chicago IL. |
I remember hearing that about the CIJ's wood too. But, if they are alder what does it matter it's finished in plastic? Both of my CIJ Jaguar and Jazzmaster were pretty heavy guitars. —"as he stepped into the stealthy night air... little did he know the fire escape was not there" https://www.facebook.com/reluctantaquanauts/ |
Joined: Feb 26, 2006 Posts: 12159 Seattle |
The alder holds the form of the plastic coating better? Those MIJs will dent at anything. You could flick it with your finger and dent it. Eric's Jazzmaster looked like the surface of the moon by the time he sold it. |
Joined: Mar 06, 2006 Posts: 306 seattle, wa |
I actually didn't add any new dents to the guitar. it did have some dents when i got it, and it did have a few mishaps during the time that i owned it, but there were never any dents other than the ones that were already on the guitar when i bought it. i do not know the stories behind those dents, and it didn't seem to dent very easily to me. the guitar was made in 94-95, so it was an early mij jazzmaster. i liked the feel of that neck a lot, i like my av a lot more, but it didn't feel lower quality than either of jake's japanese jags. i mean a neck and body covered in plastic, like bill said, is a neck and body covered in plastic. jake thought that my mij jm was a lot lighter than his cij jag, and it was lighter, but it didn't seem like it was very much lighter. his tuners seemed to be made of a different metal than mine, but i don't believe there was a difference in quality in terms of staying in tune and actually tuning the guitar. i don't know, i really liked the guitar while i played it, but when i got the av, i stopped playing it. especially since i switch between a av 57 strat and my 62 av jazz, i didn't need the guitar on stage with me too often. anyways, the mijs in my opinion weren't of any lower quality than the cijs. maybe they did use different woods, but i don't attribute that to a difference in craftmanship. it's the same people making the guitars to the same standards. japanese jazzmaster pickups are pretty crappy i know that much, you might as well have mexi strat pickups in there. —-Eric New music! Also: |
Joined: Feb 27, 2006 Posts: 1054 Chicago IL. |
Eric, Jacob, Jon, and anyone else here who's in their early 20s have grown up in a different age of cheap guitars. As I said my CIJ felt cheap compared to my AV, I would also have to say that I never had any major tuning issues with my CIJ. Even the Danelectros that were reissued about 8 years ago had truss rods. Something our fathers generation lacked. The CIJs are not bad. I just think it's foolish to upgrade one to the point of where you coulda have purchased a AV for the same price. —"as he stepped into the stealthy night air... little did he know the fire escape was not there" https://www.facebook.com/reluctantaquanauts/ |
Joined: May 20, 2006 Posts: 2174 PacNW (Vancouver, Wa U.S.A.) |
MIJ year made 1992-1993 AV made in 2001-2002 from what the neck and body says My Vintage 62' blows the other two out of the water But everyone will have thier own feedback on MIJ/AV/vintage -Kyle Beyond The Surf YouTube channel Last edited: May 24, 2006 21:08:38 |
Joined: Feb 27, 2006 Posts: 5302 the outer banks of north carolina |
i finally got to put my almost new AVRI jag to the test last night jamming with my favorite insect surfer (dave) and friends, volume up higher than i usually play, and damn if it doesn't sound GREAT.......i'm one happy mom — |
Joined: Feb 26, 2006 Posts: 250 Port Fierce, Florida |
This threa has me questioning whether I want to replace the CIJ Jazzmaster I just sold with an AV version, or go the alternate route with an AV JAguar. I had a MIJ awhile back, and while I liked it alot, it had alot of issues, so I let it go. In the meantime I've gotten really used to standard scale guitars (25.5") - the last time I played I a Jag since that one, it felt like a uke. Maybe I'll have to A/B the two over the next couple of weeks. — |