AnalogSurf
Joined: Aug 12, 2011
Posts: 133
|

Posted on Jan 04 2012 06:05 PM
Question that I cannot find on the web...
I have a RI/Classic Player Jaguar made from Parts.
My question Is on the Chromed Steel pickup claws that are mounted on
the Pickups?
I see the Bridge pickup has the larger claws on the Big E string
And the narrower on the small E string.
But im finding various pictures showing the Neck Pickups claws
On the big E string and some reversed too ! Which way is correct
and Are the opposite for phasing ? I ask because my Shields are already
installed from the factory to the pickups.
Please Bear with me If they are not called claws...Covers..Shields ????
Im looking for a techinical answer...Im sure everybody can tell me which
way their's are positioned.
Pete Analog-Surf
Last edited: Jan 04, 2012 18:33:24
|
BJB
Joined: Jul 28, 2008
Posts: 413
|

Posted on Jan 04 2012 06:46 PM
Unfortunately, you will get different answers on this one.
The two 'short' tabs, or teeth or whatever you call them go beneath the two plain strings, the B and high E. This assumes you are using a wound G string, which was what Fender and everyone else used back when the Jaguar was designed.
However, I have seen pre-CBS Jaguars with the shields reversed. I have even seen a pre-CBS Jaguar with the shield installed correctly on one pickup but not on the other.
My Japanese Jaguar, a blond LE from 1994, also came with shields that were installed at random. I saw a Jaguar from the Fender custom shop with the shields installed reversed; the short tabs were installed beneath the wound low E and A strings. I asked the builder about this and he said that I should ask Dave Wronski about it. Maybe Dave will show up and answer this question.
In reality, the position doesn't affect the sound of the pickups. I corrected the claws on my Japanese Jaguar and it didn't make any difference (it did make a difference when I recharged the pickup magnets, but that's another story). You'll have to desolder the ground to the shield, flip it around, then resolder the ground to the shield. The only benefit to installing them correctly is that you can say that the shield are installed 'technically correct', which, as we all know, is the best kind of correct there is.
— If it ain't broke, fix it until it is.
|
AnalogSurf
Joined: Aug 12, 2011
Posts: 133
|

Posted on Jan 04 2012 06:57 PM
BJB wrote:
Unfortunately, you will get different answers on this
one.
The two 'short' tabs, or teeth or whatever you call
them go beneath the two plain strings, the B and high
E. This assumes you are using a wound G string, which
was what Fender and everyone else used back when the
Jaguar was designed.
However, I have seen pre-CBS Jaguars with the shields
reversed. I have even seen a pre-CBS Jaguar with the
shield installed correctly on one pickup but not on the
other.
My Japanese Jaguar, a blond LE from 1994, also came
with shields that were installed at random. I saw a
Jaguar from the Fender custom shop with the shields
installed reversed; the short tabs were installed
beneath the wound low E and A strings. I asked the
builder about this and he said that I should ask Dave
Wronski about it. Maybe Dave will show up and answer
this question.
In reality, the position doesn't affect the sound of
the pickups. I corrected the claws on my Japanese
Jaguar and it didn't make any difference (it did make a
difference when I recharged the pickup magnets, but
that's another story). You'll have to desolder the
ground to the shield, flip it around, then resolder the
ground to the shield. The only benefit to installing
them correctly is that you can say that the shield are
installed 'technically correct', which, as we all know,
is the best kind of correct there is.
Thanks BJB
Currently the RI Pickups are both mounted with the wider slots on the
Big E string...The guitar sounds fine to me...Im running #10
Dunlop round wounds right now...I was thinking of going #11 flats
like on my Jazzmaster.
Seeing they were already soldered to the pickups my mind started to think
if I reverse the neck pickup would the coil now going in to opposite direction have any effect when both pickups are selected and the
3000pf capacitor is now active on the switch plate...
Just had to ask ...
Pete Analog-Surf
|
BJB
Joined: Jul 28, 2008
Posts: 413
|

Posted on Jan 04 2012 07:09 PM
If you reverse the pickup, it won't fit in the routing. The pickup leads will hit sides of the pickup cavity, at least on a stock Jaguar body. I believe the Warmoth bodies are routed for humbuckers, so it might be possible to flip the pickups around.
The magnet stagger will also be thrown off, assuming they are staggered in the first place.
— If it ain't broke, fix it until it is.
|
LHR
Joined: Aug 23, 2006
Posts: 2123
The jungle
|

Posted on Jan 04 2012 07:11 PM
The idea when these "claws" were conceived, was to have the two plain strings run over the shorter tines. Back then strings used a wound G. However, Fender assembled them haphazardly. Nowadays, people seem to use an unwound G most often but I still stand by a wound G for a Jaguar. Likewise for a heavier-than-fashionable gauge of 12 or better. Also, the sonic differences with claws on or off is negligible, so one might assert that the worrying about the correct orientation is fairly pointless.
— SSIV
|
Sonichris
Joined: Mar 06, 2006
Posts: 1910
Wear gloves - I'm in the Rockies
|

Posted on Jan 04 2012 07:12 PM
BJB wrote:
If you reverse the pickup, it won't fit in the routing.
The pickup leads will hit sides of the pickup cavity,
at least on a stock Jaguar body.
Thats not true - The leads on a vintage Jaguar pickup look like this - 
— "You can't tell where you're going if you don't know where you've been"
Last edited: Jan 04, 2012 19:13:51
|
Sonichris
Joined: Mar 06, 2006
Posts: 1910
Wear gloves - I'm in the Rockies
|

Posted on Jan 04 2012 07:20 PM
Oh, the Claws on my really original '65 Jag have the lower section on the big 'E' and 'A'

I don't think it makes much of a difference, and I doubt they do much shielding either.
— "You can't tell where you're going if you don't know where you've been"
|
BJB
Joined: Jul 28, 2008
Posts: 413
|

Posted on Jan 04 2012 07:22 PM
Cool pictures! They remind me of the ones of Jim Shine's website. The pickups on my Japanese Jaguar were wired quite differently. The (-) eyelet is soldered to the shield, as is the (-) lead from the pickup. I have to admit that I don't know how the leads are soldered on the RI/Classic Player guitars, but as I recall, simply flipping the pickup was not an option in my case.
— If it ain't broke, fix it until it is.
|
Sonichris
Joined: Mar 06, 2006
Posts: 1910
Wear gloves - I'm in the Rockies
|

Posted on Jan 04 2012 07:39 PM
I guess the first picture is from Jim Shines website - good eye. The second one is mine
The AVRI pickup leads look like the vintage one above.
And you are correct BJB, the MIJ pickups I've seen had the leads coming out of one end. I haven't seen a Classic Player Jag that close.
— "You can't tell where you're going if you don't know where you've been"
|
AnalogSurf
Joined: Aug 12, 2011
Posts: 133
|

Posted on Jan 04 2012 07:46 PM
The Pictures above Is how my Jaguar is setup.
Understand This is a Classic Player body with a All parts neck
On the Classic player you can put the RI pickups either direction.
Ill assume the Classic Player pickups are the same...Sounds like the
Japanese Pickups are different...
Just as a Side note on my Classic player the Thimbles have been plugged
with 5/16 allen screws and a mustang bridge repleaces the Tune-o-Matic.
Not your average Jaguar !
Pete Analog-Surf
|
DeadRanchHands
Joined: Apr 15, 2008
Posts: 1281
|

Posted on Jan 05 2012 08:26 AM
Sonichris wrote:
Oh, the Claws on my really original '65 Jag have the
lower section on the big 'E' and 'A'

I don't think it makes much of a difference, and I
doubt they do much shielding either.
Beautiful tort on that one.
— http://www.reverbnation.com/thedeadranchhands
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jZEW74mHjQk
|
SlacktoneDave
Joined: Jul 01, 2006
Posts: 657
|

Posted on Jan 05 2012 08:28 AM
BJB wrote:
My Japanese Jaguar, a blond LE from 1994, also came
with shields that were installed at random. I saw a
Jaguar from the Fender custom shop with the shields
installed reversed; the short tabs were installed
beneath the wound low E and A strings. I asked the
builder about this and he said that I should ask Dave
Wronski about it. Maybe Dave will show up and answer
this question.
Here's my opinion... the low side should be under the low "E" and "A" strings.
☛ The catalog picture from 1963 that shows the new Twin Reverb and three Jaguars clearly shows the low side on the E and A side of the pickups.
☛ My unmolested 1963 Jaguar has the low side of the combs on the bass side.
☛ The comb thing is technically called a "keeper". It kicks up the induction much like a Telecaster elevator plate found on Tele bridge pickups. It also re-directs the magnetic field back into the pickup, and, I think is supposed to lower the noise, somehow.
☛ Perhaps Leo, and the guys thought that the induction sound has a little bit better balanced if they lessened it under the thicker strings which have more mass.
opinions are mine, not speaking for anyone else on this....
~ dave
|
AnalogSurf
Joined: Aug 12, 2011
Posts: 133
|

Posted on Jan 05 2012 02:10 PM
SlacktoneDave wrote:
BJB wrote:
My Japanese Jaguar, a blond LE from 1994, also came
with shields that were installed at random. I saw a
Jaguar from the Fender custom shop with the shields
installed reversed; the short tabs were installed
beneath the wound low E and A strings. I asked the
builder about this and he said that I should ask
Dave
Wronski about it. Maybe Dave will show up and
answer
this question.
Here's my opinion... the low side should be under the
low "E" and "A" strings.
☛ The catalog picture from 1963 that shows the new Twin
Reverb and three Jaguars clearly shows the low side on
the E and A side of the pickups.
☛ My unmolested 1963 Jaguar has the low side of the
combs on the bass side.
☛ The comb thing is technically called a "keeper". It
kicks up the induction much like a Telecaster elevator
plate found on Tele bridge pickups. It also re-directs
the magnetic field back into the pickup, and, I think
is supposed to lower the noise, somehow.
☛ Perhaps Leo, and the guys thought that the induction
sound has a little bit better balanced if they lessened
it under the thicker strings which have more mass.
opinions are mine, not speaking for anyone else on
this....
~ dave
I know what your saying Dave.
On another Topic they are Ooooing and Ahhhing over the Johnny Marr
Jaguar but when I look at the picture the front Pickup "Keeper" is
in the opposite direction of the Bridge "Keeper" ??????
Hey my parts Jaguar is working fine but when you see more and more pictures of them with the Neck pickup the other way you start to question yourself,,,Am I Wrong...Would it sound better ?
To Clarify my jaguar body is the Classic player MIM but the Neck is
an ALL Parts made in Japan with all RI parts ordered...I question the
chrome plates though...they seem like Chinese knock off's ...
Hey it was built for 1/2 what a real one goes for.
Pete Analog-Surf
|
DeadRanchHands
Joined: Apr 15, 2008
Posts: 1281
|

Posted on Jan 05 2012 02:16 PM
SlacktoneDave wrote:
BJB wrote:
My Japanese Jaguar, a blond LE from 1994, also came
with shields that were installed at random. I saw a
Jaguar from the Fender custom shop with the shields
installed reversed; the short tabs were installed
beneath the wound low E and A strings. I asked the
builder about this and he said that I should ask
Dave
Wronski about it. Maybe Dave will show up and
answer
this question.
Here's my opinion... the low side should be under the
low "E" and "A" strings.
☛ The catalog picture from 1963 that shows the new Twin
Reverb and three Jaguars clearly shows the low side on
the E and A side of the pickups.
☛ My unmolested 1963 Jaguar has the low side of the
combs on the bass side.
☛ The comb thing is technically called a "keeper". It
kicks up the induction much like a Telecaster elevator
plate found on Tele bridge pickups. It also re-directs
the magnetic field back into the pickup, and, I think
is supposed to lower the noise, somehow.
☛ Perhaps Leo, and the guys thought that the induction
sound has a little bit better balanced if they lessened
it under the thicker strings which have more mass.
opinions are mine, not speaking for anyone else on
this....
~ dave
That's how I have them oriented on my parts Jag thing. Not having tried it the other way, I don't know how much difference it makes.
— http://www.reverbnation.com/thedeadranchhands
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jZEW74mHjQk
|
eddiekatcher
Joined: Mar 14, 2006
Posts: 2778
Atlanta, GA
|

Posted on Jan 05 2012 08:21 PM
On my Jaguar, the short claws are are both on the treble side. When I "hid" jaguar pickups under the covers on one of my Jazzmasters, to use in really noisy places, I left the claws intact.
ed
— Traditional........speak softly and play through a big blonde amp. Did I mention that I still like big blonde amps?
|