JakeDobner
Joined: Feb 26, 2006
Posts: 12159
Seattle
|

Posted on Mar 13 2009 06:02 PM
Just a thought on this subject.
I'm sure we've all felt the rumble of a subwoofer or anything else with a low frequency. This made me think of Newton's third law. For every action there is an equal and opposite reaction. Same thing with shooting a gun and the recoil. So if these bass frequencies are shaking us then there must be more energy required to shake us.
|
DannySnyder
Joined: Mar 02, 2006
Posts: 11075
Berkeley, CA
|

Posted on Mar 13 2009 07:57 PM
Brian
Work is energy per unit of time. If I have to move a speaker cone back and forth 20,000 a second, I think I am doing more work than if I do it 20 times a second.
I know I am missing something in my analysis, but I'm not sure what yet.
I think that if you have 20khz signal and 20hz signal at the same amplitude, you'd hear the 20k much easier. So to compensate you have to amplify the lower frequencies much more. Though I could be wrong...
— Danny Snyder
"With great reverb comes great responsibility" - Uncle Leo
I am now playing trumpet with Prince Buster tribute band 'Balzac'
Playing keys and guitar with Combo Tezeta
Formerly a guitarist in The TomorrowMen and Meshugga Beach Party
Latest surf project - Now That's What I Call SURF
|
Brian
Joined: Feb 25, 2006
Posts: 19337
Des Moines, Iowa, USA
|

Posted on Mar 13 2009 10:37 PM
You probably got something there Danny.
— Site dude - S3 Agent #202
Need help with the site? SG101 FAQ - Send me a private message - Email me
"It starts... when it begins" -- Ralf Kilauea
|
Ben
Joined: Feb 11, 2007
Posts: 591
Encinitas, Ca
|

Posted on Mar 13 2009 11:16 PM
I was told there'd be no math......
|
Mel
Joined: Feb 25, 2008
Posts: 321
Canada's Wet Coast
|

Posted on Mar 14 2009 12:32 AM
Brian
Work is energy per unit of time. If I have to move a speaker cone back and forth 20,000 a second, I think I am doing more work than if I do it 20 times a second.
I know I am missing something in my analysis, but I'm not sure what yet.
I'm guessing it might boil down to how much air you're moving in a given amount of time. Since the bass speaker only moves at 20Hz, it has to travel a lot further to move the same volume of air? So maybe you'll end up doing a lot of work to move that 20Hz speaker the distance it needs to go to make a noise?
That's maybe why those subwoofers look like they're about ready to jump out of the enclosure when you drive them with a couple hundred watts (and it takes a fair bit of wattage to move those cones).
I know those low frequencies get absorbed by a lot of things and that might be why we tend to feel rather than "hear" them.
— Mel
|
Brian
Joined: Feb 25, 2006
Posts: 19337
Des Moines, Iowa, USA
|

Posted on Mar 14 2009 10:14 AM
Yeah. Will this be on the final?
— Site dude - S3 Agent #202
Need help with the site? SG101 FAQ - Send me a private message - Email me
"It starts... when it begins" -- Ralf Kilauea
|
JonW
Joined: Mar 07, 2008
Posts: 237
Indiana
|

Posted on Mar 14 2009 01:08 PM
Ben
I was told there'd be no math......
He he. 
Brian
Work is energy per unit of time. If I have to move a speaker cone back and forth 20,000 a second, I think I am doing more work than if I do it 20 times a second.
I know I am missing something in my analysis, but I'm not sure what yet.
Hi Brian,
Lets see if I can help or just confuse some more. I think its a matter of size
Its relatively difficult for a 12 cone to make a 20,000 Hz sound but relatively easy to make a 20 Hz sound.
From the opposite perspective, its easy for a 1 tweeter to make a 20,000 Hz sound but quite difficult for it to make a 20 Hz sound.
In the case of a guitar/bass speaker we have a speaker of a given size, lets say a single paper coned 12. And it operates well in about the 60-2,500 Hz range.
But it does need to move more air to make that 60 Hz note than it does to make, say, a 1,000 Hz note. The wavelengths are longer. Off the top of my head Id guess about 8 feet at 60 Hz versus 10 inches at 1,000 Hz (dont quote me on the numbers). Plus our ears are less sensitive to low frequencies, say below 100 Hz (google Fletcher-Munson curves). I think low E on a 4 string bass is 40 Hz. And I think that people just tend to like bass played louder than a sharper, more piercing high note.
So that 12 cone needs to work harder (i.e., needs more power input) to produce a bass guitar note of 80 Hz of the same perceived loudness (or to yield the same smile on a face) as a regular guitar treble note of 1,000 Hz.
Does that help or just confuse?
|
Brian
Joined: Feb 25, 2006
Posts: 19337
Des Moines, Iowa, USA
|

Posted on Mar 14 2009 01:42 PM
There is a certain amount of work you have to apply to vibrate a speaker at say 3000 Hz. You have to move the voice coil back and forth at this rate. A lot of this work gets lost as heat in the coil. My reasoning was that it is less work to move the speaker at only say 60 Hz.
If I vibrate anything at 60 Hz, it is making a 60 Hz tone, period, end of story, no matter how much "air it moves".
Of course since we are talking about guitars and amps, we want a human to be able to hear this 60 Hz tone. So we have to raise the amplitude, but keep the frequency the same (60 Hz). This means moving the speaker farther, but still at 60 Hz. This amount of work, I imagine, dwarfs the work required to move the speaker a smaller amount of travel at a higher rate. Or something.
— Site dude - S3 Agent #202
Need help with the site? SG101 FAQ - Send me a private message - Email me
"It starts... when it begins" -- Ralf Kilauea
|
Kawentzmann
Joined: Feb 27, 2006
Posts: 1062
Berlin, Germany
|

Posted on Mar 14 2009 02:19 PM
You feel bass sounds rather than hear them because our ears are not made for them as they are for mids and treble, because we communicate in these frequencies. Bass frequencies are not easily absorbed, you can hear them for great distances. A trebly sound is associated with something near by.
— The Exotic Guitar of Kahuna Kawentzmann
You can get the boy out of the Keynes era, but you can’t get the Keynes era out of the boy.
Last edited: Mar 14, 2009 14:56:22
|
JonW
Joined: Mar 07, 2008
Posts: 237
Indiana
|

Posted on Mar 14 2009 02:38 PM
Brian
There is a certain amount of work you have to apply to vibrate a speaker at say 3000 Hz. You have to move the voice coil back and forth at this rate. A lot of this work gets lost as heat in the coil. My reasoning was that it is less work to move the speaker at only say 60 Hz.
If I vibrate anything at 60 Hz, it is making a 60 Hz tone, period, end of story, no matter how much "air it moves".
Of course since we are talking about guitars and amps, we want a human to be able to hear this 60 Hz tone. So we have to raise the amplitude, but keep the frequency the same (60 Hz). This means moving the speaker farther, but still at 60 Hz. This amount of work, I imagine, dwarfs the work required to move the speaker a smaller amount of travel at a higher rate. Or something.
Yup. To add to that... I'm not 100% sure about this, but... I think that the cone/voice coil have to move farther in and out to produce that 60 Hz tone than they do when making, say, a 2,000 Hz tone. Because of the differences in wavelengths involved (e.g., 10 feet versus 10 inches).
So at 60 Hz you are not moving the cone back and forth too rapidly, but it is moving in and out large distances.
By contrast, for the 2,000 Hz tone, it is moving in and out much more often, but with less travel each time.
And here are the Fletcher-Munson curves to show how loudly things need to play to be perceived as equal loudness:
At living room guitar volumes it looks like a 60 Hz tone needs to be played 15-20 db louder than a 2,000 Hz tone to be perceived as the same.
|
Brian
Joined: Feb 25, 2006
Posts: 19337
Des Moines, Iowa, USA
|

Posted on Mar 14 2009 04:28 PM
Nice explanation, I'm good now. 
— Site dude - S3 Agent #202
Need help with the site? SG101 FAQ - Send me a private message - Email me
"It starts... when it begins" -- Ralf Kilauea
|
DannySnyder
Joined: Mar 02, 2006
Posts: 11075
Berkeley, CA
|

Posted on Mar 14 2009 07:27 PM
Me too 
— Danny Snyder
"With great reverb comes great responsibility" - Uncle Leo
I am now playing trumpet with Prince Buster tribute band 'Balzac'
Playing keys and guitar with Combo Tezeta
Formerly a guitarist in The TomorrowMen and Meshugga Beach Party
Latest surf project - Now That's What I Call SURF
|
dp
Joined: Feb 26, 2006
Posts: 3546
mojave desert, california
|

Posted on Mar 15 2009 10:50 AM
man, this thread is an awesome micro-course on psycho-accoustics!
so when will we be diving into the"Haas effect"?
|
JonW
Joined: Mar 07, 2008
Posts: 237
Indiana
|

Posted on Mar 16 2009 05:39 PM
The Haas effect. Cool. It's one of those things that we probably all know about, intuitively. Like when you're at a large concert hall and see speakers going far back from the stage. You know they have to be delayed, lower in volume, and all that. Didn't know it was a phenomenon so important as to have someone's name attached to it. 
"Who is responsible for discovereing the Hass Effect?"
"That would be Mr. Effect!"

|
newey
Joined: Feb 06, 2009
Posts: 10
Ohio
|

Posted on Mar 16 2009 10:47 PM
JonW had it right . It's the amount of "in and out" that's the key variable. The term for this is "speaker excursion". Bass speakers (and keyboard and PA speakers as well) allow for more excursion than guitar speakers do, so as to be able to reproduce the lower frequencies without damage.
Any guitar amp can be used for bass so long as a bass speaker is used with it. Whether the resulting sound is any good is a matter of personal preference. You won't hurt the amp, though.
In those old Vintage days we so love, the only difference between guitar and bass amps was usually that bass amps eliminated the 'verb and trem. Modern bass amps tend to have different tone stacks than guitar amps, specifically oriented towards bass tones.
So long as the Bandmaster is played at practice levels, though, it should be OK.
There is also the issue of open-backed vs. closed back cabs. I have heard it said- though I can't personally vouch for this- that a bass speaker can be damaged by using it in an open-backed cab, as the speaker excursion to the rear is not damped by the air pressure in the back of the cab. Closed back cabs are said to provide added damping of the rearward speaker excursion. "Tuned" ports are often added to closed cabs, to allow this extra pressure to escape and provide additional bass tone.
This may be more myth than anything, but one might be careful about putting a bass speaker in an open cab for this reason.
— If I wax pot my pickups, will they work underwater?
|
JonW
Joined: Mar 07, 2008
Posts: 237
Indiana
|

Posted on Mar 18 2009 01:11 PM
Hi newey,
Yup, were thinking about things along the same lines. Excursion or travel or Xmax, etc. are important in not killing the speaker.
It makes sense that a closed back or sealed cabinet will protect the speaker more than an open backed or ported cabinet. If its sealed, when the cone moves out it creates a vacuum behind it and that vacuum will limit how far it can really go, thereby protecting it. But you loose some low end bass that way, too.
For the guitar speaker cabinet I made, I arranged it such that the rear is convertible- it can be open or closed back. (See pics below) So I should close it up if I start playing some bass with that setup.
Then again, if I pick up bass, I may be posting later asking for suggestions for a nice bass amp setup. Ive read all the threads on the topic here. Maybe a blackface Showman or Dual Showman with 2 x 15 speakers of some sort
? Not sure what the ideal would be. Hmmm

|
newey
Joined: Feb 06, 2009
Posts: 10
Ohio
|

Posted on Mar 23 2009 09:17 PM
Nice bit of cabinetry there, Jon! I like your closed/open back idea.
I don't play bass, so I'm not the one to ask about optimum set-ups for that. I'm just starting a rebuild of a P-Bass clone, as I figured it would be good to have a bass around the house for plunking away on, and for those late-night impromptu jams when friends stop by.
I would think, however, that 2 15"s might be a bit much unless you're planning on some serious gigging with the rig. Either a single 15" or a pair of 10" speakers ought to be plenty for most uses, or so my bass playing buddies would tell you.
— If I wax pot my pickups, will they work underwater?
|
JonW
Joined: Mar 07, 2008
Posts: 237
Indiana
|

Posted on Mar 24 2009 12:55 PM
Thanks newey. Im happy with the looks and sounds of the cabinet. But my real goal was to build it and still have 10 fingers afterwards, so I could play guitar. 
Good idea to have a bass around. I may do the same. Ive been thinking about this more lately. And Im wondering what the ideal cabinet and speaker setup might be. I could just buy the speakers and build another cabinet. Maybe go with pine or something of the sort next time, to keep the weight down. Maybe build the cabinet and speakers and run it with the Bandmaster for a while. If I want to get louder, just keep the same cabinet and speakers but pick up a Showman or Dual Showman. Not sure what type of speakers to use, though. The only person Ive seen here using what I might guess to be an ideal bass amp setup is WoodyJ. And near as I can tell, the speakers he uses are not being made any more. Ive searched and read all the bass setup threads here. Im open to suggestions. Maybe I should start a new thread. In the mean time, Ill ask
Anyone got any recommendations for the ideal bass speakers or cabinet configurations?
|
WoodyJ
Joined: Apr 05, 2006
Posts: 1547
Bethlehem, GA
|

Posted on Mar 24 2009 01:46 PM
JonW
Thanks newey. Im happy with the looks and sounds of the cabinet. But my real goal was to build it and still have 10 fingers afterwards, so I could play guitar.
Good idea to have a bass around. I may do the same. Ive been thinking about this more lately. And Im wondering what the ideal cabinet and speaker setup might be. I could just buy the speakers and build another cabinet. Maybe go with pine or something of the sort next time, to keep the weight down. Maybe build the cabinet and speakers and run it with the Bandmaster for a while. If I want to get louder, just keep the same cabinet and speakers but pick up a Showman or Dual Showman. Not sure what type of speakers to use, though. The only person Ive seen here using what I might guess to be an ideal bass amp setup is WoodyJ. And near as I can tell, the speakers he uses are not being made any more. Ive searched and read all the bass setup threads here. Im open to suggestions. Maybe I should start a new thread. In the mean time, Ill ask
Anyone got any recommendations for the ideal bass speakers or cabinet configurations?
Bass players are a different breed than guitar players from a gear standpoint. While a majority of guitar players stick with gear whose designs date back to the 50's and 60's...Strats, Teles, Les Pauls, Fender, Vox and Marshall tube amps..many bass players seem to gravitate toward the "latest, greatest" gear available, especially regarding amps. While the Ampeg SVT with a 8x10 cabinet is still the standard for the big stages, there is an unbelievable array of bass amps to suit the needs of every bassists style. Speaker choice is also complex, depending on what you want. Everything from cabs with 5" drivers to 18".
With that said, I'm still pretty old school bass-wise. Duck Dunn, James Jamerson and Bob Bogle are my bass heroes. Yes, I am a huge fan of the Electro-Voice bass speakers, but they are getting hard to find and have become very pricey. E-V's current bass speaker appears to be the DL 12X and DL 15X, available at U.S.Speaker, site link: http://www.usspeaker.com/homepage.htm
The latest thing in bass speaker technology is the neodymium magnet. The neo magnets weigh a lot less than conventional alnico or ceramic ones and in my experience perform just as well. I have two Mesa bass amps with 12" neos, and they sound fabulous. Eminence seems to be the new leader in bass speakers, and they are priced very reasonably compared to a new E-V or an old JBL that will probably need reconing. SWR, Fender and other bass amp manufacturers are using Eminence speakers nowadays, so they must be decent.
Speaker size? That's a personal preference thing. 10's give a tight, focused sound. 18's (to me) are way too flabby. I like either a single or two 15's for stage work, and 12's in the studio.
Cabinet size/volume is very important. Although a Dual Showman is a very good bass rig with proper speakers, it would sound better if the cabinet were deeper (front-to-rear) as it is voiced for guitar, not bass. There is a lot of science involved in speaker cabinet design and porting that is way over my head. But I will say that tone-wise, the single 15" Fender clone cabinet that Eddie Katcher built for me several years back is the best-sounding single 15" bass cab I've ever played through. It is the same size as the very early single 12" tone ring Showman/Bassman cabinets (30" wide. 20" high), but I had Eddie make this one 15" deep (instead of 11.5") to get more cabinet volume. It's all you need in all but the bigger venues. Here's a pic:

— Jack Booth
(aka WoodyJ)
The Mariners (1964-68, 1996-2005), 2025
The Hula Hounds (1996-2000)
The X-Rays (1997-2004)
The Surge! (2004, 2011-2012)
Various non-surf bands that actually made money (1978-1990)
Last edited: Mar 24, 2009 17:57:52
|
eddiekatcher
Joined: Mar 14, 2006
Posts: 2778
Atlanta, GA
|

Posted on Mar 24 2009 03:32 PM
See there BTD.......
No discrimination in Southern Surf Circles.................ed
Oh, nice looking cab Woody. It's easy to carry up the stairs at Smith's Olde Bar too I'll bet!
ed
— Traditional........speak softly and play through a big blonde amp. Did I mention that I still like big blonde amps?
|