Emilien03
Joined: Jul 16, 2008
Posts: 1367
Coyoacán, Distrito Federal
|
Posted on Aug 19 2008 01:53 PM
HELLO
WHAT DO YOU PREFER?:
A) THAT VINTAGE/BULB (DISTOR AT MOMENTS) SOUND KINDA BELAIRS OR PHANTOM SURFERS.
B) PROFESIONAL RECORDINGS AND CLEAR SOUND.
— When you have to shoot ... shoot! Don't talk.
"Los Grainders" www.facebook.com/losgrainders
"Planeta Reverb" www.facebook.com/planetareverb
|
oestmann
Joined: Mar 06, 2008
Posts: 584
Adelaide
|
Posted on Aug 22 2008 08:28 PM
Emilien03
HELLO
WHAT DO YOU PREFER?:
A) THAT VINTAGE/BULB (DISTOR AT MOMENTS) SOUND KINDA BELAIRS OR PHANTOM SURFERS.
B) PROFESIONAL RECORDINGS AND CLEAR SOUND.
Both A and B!!!
— Tim O
oestmann guitar
tunes
clips
|
Kawentzmann
Joined: Feb 27, 2006
Posts: 1057
Berlin, Germany
|
Posted on Aug 23 2008 05:06 AM
My ideal is when you have the best of both worlds. All the great artifacts of old recordings - to me they are part of the magic and create potentially wilder sounding recordings. But when they are mixed and produced to be able to compete with modern recordings all the better.
— The Exotic Guitar of Kahuna Kawentzmann
You can get the boy out of the Keynes era, but you can’t get the Keynes era out of the boy.
|
DannySnyder
Joined: Mar 02, 2006
Posts: 11045
Berkeley, CA
|
Posted on Aug 23 2008 09:27 AM
Kawentzmann
My ideal is when you have the best of both worlds. All the great artifacts of old recordings - to me they are part of the magic and create potentially wilder sounding recordings. But when they are mixed and produced to be able to compete with modern recordings all the better.
Well said KK.
— Danny Snyder
"With great reverb comes great responsibility" - Uncle Leo
Playing keys and guitar with Combo Tezeta
Formerly a guitarist in The TomorrowMen and Meshugga Beach Party
Latest surf project - Now That's What I Call SURF
|
JakeDobner
Joined: Feb 26, 2006
Posts: 12159
Seattle
|
Posted on Aug 23 2008 09:58 AM
|
zak
Joined: Sep 24, 2007
Posts: 2728
|
Posted on Aug 23 2008 11:30 AM
This post has been removed by the author.
Last edited: Sep 23, 2009 18:59:34
|
dp
Joined: Feb 26, 2006
Posts: 3546
mojave desert, california
|
Posted on Aug 23 2008 01:16 PM
zak
One of the things people eventually learn about recording is that some of the "huge" sounds you hear on recordings are only available at very low volume levels. Good recordings are (at least partially) an auditory illusion.
very well said! much of what gets heard, in the end, lies in the mastering process...
|
bomboraboy
Joined: May 26, 2007
Posts: 87
|
Posted on Aug 25 2008 01:31 PM
I prefer "bad"/vintage recording.
Ever heard "Get ready" by the ready men?
I just like it when you hear the room where it was recorded and there is some hum and some frequencies cut out. the whole band should records it in one take.
Little mistakes are also quite cool.
"Modern" recording is just too clean. it's like an other genre, as original surf is vintage recording.
For me, Daikaiju is not 100% a surf band also because of their recording technique; though I like their style and music.
Just my 2cents.
b
|
benhagerty
Joined: Sep 12, 2008
Posts: 25
Boston MA.
|
Posted on Sep 12 2008 09:20 PM
bomboraboy
I prefer "bad"/vintage recording.
I just like it when you hear the room where it was recorded and there is some hum and some frequencies cut out. the whole band should records it in one take.
Little mistakes are also quite cool.
"Modern" recording is just too clean. it's like an other genre, as original surf is vintage recording.
b
+1 for sure. I feel the same way.
|
tonetti
Joined: Aug 20, 2008
Posts: 654
California
|
Posted on Sep 12 2008 09:44 PM
To me the crustier the better, some of my favorite albums are pretty low budget, All of the early 80s punk just has that raw sound, just listen to the Germs, I dont think you could make a recording as bad as they did if you tried, but it just sounds right for some reason.
|
dooley
Joined: Jan 07, 2007
Posts: 30
|
Posted on Sep 12 2008 11:31 PM
The older recordings were sped up on the first cuts to stay under 2 minutes...AM radio...poor production...# keys, uneven/fast tempos..hard to tune to the radio.
Today it's digital.
You can adjust the music to the way it can be played...and it should be the way it was laid down.
So, You maybe might get to copy the album/45, but style up and give it back........all
— Reverb for everybody, on the house.
|
synchro
Joined: Feb 02, 2008
Posts: 4397
Not One-Sawn, but Two-Sawn . . . AZ.
|
Posted on Sep 13 2008 11:00 AM
dooley
The older recordings were sped up on the first cuts to stay under 2 minutes...AM radio...poor production...# keys, uneven/fast tempos..hard to tune to the radio.
Today it's digital.
You can adjust the music to the way it can be played...and it should be the way it was laid down.
So, You maybe might get to copy the album/45, but style up and give it back........all
I think that you make a very good point. While the sound of some of the old recordings is without a doubt priceless some of the production values were shameful, such as speeding up tracks for airplay.
The concept of a song being 3 minutes long was dictated by the capacity of 78s and later on 45s. Station formats changed somewhat to accomodate LPs at least in the late '60 and onward but by then the radio business had learned to live by the the decree of 3 minutes as a proper length for a song. Unfortunately this decree dominated music production for decades and is even felt today. I don't have sat-radio, at least yet, but I can only imagine that this could have a very positive effect.
To return to the core topic however, I think I'll weigh in with Kawentzmann when he said: "My ideal is when you have the best of both worlds. All the great artifacts of old recordings - to me they are part of the magic and create potentially wilder sounding recordings. But when they are mixed and produced to be able to compete with modern recordings all the better."
It's pretty hard to improve upon the spontaneity of old recordings and the artifacts and glitches add to the charm. If you can start with that and improve the overall sound quality I see it as a winning combination.
— The artist formerly known as: Synchro
When Surf Guitar is outlawed only outlaws will play Surf Guitar.
|
JakeDobner
Joined: Feb 26, 2006
Posts: 12159
Seattle
|
Posted on Sep 13 2008 11:10 AM
Sure it may be cool to listen to an album that has artifacts and such, but for any band making a new album, do you really want your album to sound like that? I just can't imagine trying to make something that didn't sound as good as possible. Of course we did record into digital, but that is only because of time contraints. And recording to tape is great, but we recorded into a really great board and at 192khz.
|
Kawentzmann
Joined: Feb 27, 2006
Posts: 1057
Berlin, Germany
|
Posted on Sep 13 2008 11:28 AM
JakeDobner
Sure it may be cool to listen to an album that has artifacts and such, but for any band making a new album, do you really want your album to sound like that? I just can't imagine trying to make something that didn't sound as good as possible. Of course we did record into digital, but that is only because of time contraints. And recording to tape is great, but we recorded into a really great board and at 192khz.
As good as possible, sure.
— The Exotic Guitar of Kahuna Kawentzmann
You can get the boy out of the Keynes era, but you can’t get the Keynes era out of the boy.
|
synchro
Joined: Feb 02, 2008
Posts: 4397
Not One-Sawn, but Two-Sawn . . . AZ.
|
Posted on Sep 13 2008 11:55 AM
JakeDobner
Sure it may be cool to listen to an album that has artifacts and such, but for any band making a new album, do you really want your album to sound like that? I just can't imagine trying to make something that didn't sound as good as possible. Of course we did record into digital, but that is only because of time contraints. And recording to tape is great, but we recorded into a really great board and at 192khz.
I agree. I am not into the lo-fi movement at all. If Edison were alive today he'd be working for the best sound possible, not the most vintage-correct sound.
It's one thing to restore something in a limited fashion to preserve some of its charm and quite another to purposely make something new with plenty of artificial vintage charm.
Kawentzmann
As good as possible, sure.
Certainly.
— The artist formerly known as: Synchro
When Surf Guitar is outlawed only outlaws will play Surf Guitar.
|
Kawentzmann
Joined: Feb 27, 2006
Posts: 1057
Berlin, Germany
|
Posted on Sep 13 2008 02:19 PM
I think we all agree that a tube amp will produce superior sound to solid state. Because we like what it does to the signal being put into it. But it's not only guitar amps that do nice little things. And digital indirectly brought a lot of these things back, because it became too obvious that a textbook sound-recording doesnt sound very exciting.
— The Exotic Guitar of Kahuna Kawentzmann
You can get the boy out of the Keynes era, but you can’t get the Keynes era out of the boy.
|
zak
Joined: Sep 24, 2007
Posts: 2728
|
Posted on Sep 13 2008 02:31 PM
This post has been removed by the author.
Last edited: Sep 23, 2009 19:17:31
|
tonetti
Joined: Aug 20, 2008
Posts: 654
California
|
Posted on Sep 13 2008 02:37 PM
One thing I must add to this topic, I do like that underproduced crusty sound, on old recordings, because that is just the way it was, or alll the artists could afford, and it just works. But I hate when this sound is acquired purposely, on new recordings. So I guess what Im saying is that a good quality recording is great with new music. Although, there is a ton of new music out therer that is so overproduced, this sound is absolutely unattainable in a live setting. I dont know how many times I have heard a CD, and then saw the band, and said to myself "these guys really sound like shit live" Does anyone here agree?
|
JakeDobner
Joined: Feb 26, 2006
Posts: 12159
Seattle
|
Posted on Sep 13 2008 02:40 PM
Albums should be recorded as best they can. You know what happens then? If the song is great then you get the best possible result. Is there such a thing as a song that is recorded too well? Because personally, I would just say that song is either boring or it sucks.
|
synchro
Joined: Feb 02, 2008
Posts: 4397
Not One-Sawn, but Two-Sawn . . . AZ.
|
Posted on Sep 13 2008 02:40 PM
Kawentzmann
I think we all agree that a tube amp will produce superior sound to solid state. Because we like what it does to the signal being put into it. But it's not only guitar amps that do nice little things. And digital indirectly brought a lot of these things back, because it became too obvious that a textbook sound-recording doesnt sound very exciting.
All of this brings to mind the fine line between creating a sound and simply amplifying a sound. We all expect some coloration of tone from our guitar amps, even super clean amps have an effect on tone. OTOH, we don't want a PA to color the sound much at all. Usually we setup the PA to be as transparent as possible.
Recording sort of combines the two. Good recording gear is usually very transparent but the sound is usually manipulated somewhere along the line to get the mix that is going to sound right. In the days of tube recording consoles the coloration was inevitable but with digital recording it is possible to make a recording that is very accurate in its reproduction of the source. Fortunately (or not, depending on your opinion) the same digital magic also can be used to create effects including emulations of some of the effects inherent in analog recording. Still, it's hard to imagine an effect that can duplicate good tape being pushed a bit.
— The artist formerly known as: Synchro
When Surf Guitar is outlawed only outlaws will play Surf Guitar.
|