I go back and forth between 18v and 9v. It may just come down to real estate on my Bbe supa charger unfortunately.
—Get wet and loud wit... Abomionable Showmen FB Showmen Twitter
SabedLeepski:
Sunburn Surf Fest for some scorching hot surf music: https://sunb...
322 days ago
skeeter:
I know a Polish sound guy.
249 days ago
skeeter:
I know a Czech one too!
249 days ago
PatGall:
Surfybear metal settings
169 days ago
Pyronauts:
Happy Tanks-Kicking!
147 days ago
midwestsurfguy:
Merry Christmas!
116 days ago
sysmalakian:
HAPPY NEW YEAR!
109 days ago
SabedLeepski:
Surfin‘ Europe, for surf (related) gigs and events in Europe https://sunb...
70 days ago
SHADOWNIGHT5150:
I like big reverb and i cannot lie
3 days ago
SHADOWNIGHT5150:
Bank accounts are a scam created by a shadow government
3 days ago
#ShallowEnd is empty.
No polls at this time. Check out our past polls.
No contests at this time. Check out our past contests.
Joined: Jul 17, 2011 Posts: 59 |
I go back and forth between 18v and 9v. It may just come down to real estate on my Bbe supa charger unfortunately. —Get wet and loud wit... Abomionable Showmen FB Showmen Twitter |
Joined: Mar 30, 2011 Posts: 388 Copenhagen |
I'm using it for rehearsals and for gigs where I can't take my 63 RI reverb. My 18v el cheapo adaptor died after one use so I can't really comment on the voltage difference. It's not like the real thing but it does a very good job emulating the tone and the responsiveness to my playing, which is a rare thing. But for playing Astronauts style stuff, with heavy drip, maybe a Boss FRV would be better. —https://zakandthekrakens.bandcamp.com/ |
Joined: Sep 29, 2007 Posts: 500 Sacto, CA |
So, there has been some discussion about 9v vs 19v. I have a Pedal Power 4x4 power brick that has choices of 9v 100 mA, 9v 400 mA or 12v 400 mA. Which of these choices would be right for the Topanga (which I don't have at this point)? Or does it really matter all that much? |
Joined: Jan 04, 2011 Posts: 1588 Berlin L-Berg |
Every output on your PP 4x4 will be okay. I think the CA TPG needs less than 100mA. IIRC most Catalinbread devices can be powered with 9-18V. Using higher voltage results in more headroom and more defined low end. |
Joined: Aug 29, 2009 Posts: 1555 Israel |
Topanga draws max 60mA, according to Catalinbread. |
Joined: Jan 01, 2008 Posts: 2105 Livorno |
DreadInBabylon wrote:
After an initial excitement about the Topanga and purchasing it I have to say that it is a better reverb, probably the best reverb pedal I ever tried together with the Flint. But anyway still not working close to the tank. I had the chance to try it a little in the US and now I did some extensive tryout back in Italy. But anyway I DO NOT understand the excitement for the surfy bear. It is not a reverb pedal > it is a controller. you still need an external reverb pan. What is the advantage??? Yes ok, it might work better and similar to a tank compared to the Vanamps, but you do not solve the problem. If you have to carry a solid state control + a reverb pan (for which you have to build at least a box...) why not carrying around the reverb tank directly??? I do not see the point of the surfy bear honestly. —Lorenzo "Surfer Joe" Valdambrini |
Joined: Jan 01, 2008 Posts: 2105 Livorno |
surferjoemusic wrote:
Do not misunderstand me, I appreciate the job a lot, but we are here talking about a pedal, which is a problem solver. Not a replacement of a Fender Tank that takes approx the same space in the end in a custom made cabinet... —Lorenzo "Surfer Joe" Valdambrini |
Joined: Jul 01, 2006 Posts: 657 |
I got one, am useing it with a 1965 reverb unit in combination in this video. http://isurfguitar.com/isurfguitar/AvalonSlip.html -Dave |
Joined: Jan 04, 2011 Posts: 1588 Berlin L-Berg |
I think it's more a question of money, not space. Also reliabilty 'may' be a point. — |
Joined: Mar 13, 2009 Posts: 2351 Twin Cities, MN |
|
Joined: Sep 29, 2007 Posts: 500 Sacto, CA |
As far as the Topanga not sounding exactly like a tank, I'm fine with that. I'm not wanting to duplicate a tank sound. I HAD a tank for a few years and didn't like it all that much for the way I play. I want a "tank-like" tone at times for certain songs but not ALL songs. For me, the Topanga would offer portability, and more versatility in tuning in different reverb settings than I could ever get out of my long gone tank. To me, the tank that I had was kind of a "one trick pony" but I know that's just me. I'm not saying anything against tanks - they are very good at what they do and I am in no way saying that any reverb pedal will directly replace a tank if that exact sound is what you are after. Last edited: Aug 27, 2014 16:39:40 |
Joined: Apr 29, 2010 Posts: 2460 Venice, CA |
josheboy wrote: YEAH!!! Insect Surfers |
Joined: Oct 05, 2011 Posts: 110 Eastern Berlifornia |
Rob_J wrote:
A one trick pony is the best pony you can get. As long it does THE trick. |
Joined: Jan 01, 2008 Posts: 2105 Livorno |
Rob_J wrote:
And I am not saying the Topanga is shit. But it IS sold as a tank replica. At least it is the first reverb pedal where a demonstrator talks about surf music, not just about blues. I play trad surf. My school is Double Showman and Reverb tank. This stuff IS reliable (answering another post), but it is heavy and big - agreed on this. I got the Topanga to be portable when I cannot fit the "real" equipment. I also got a Quilter Tone Block of which I am very happy. So I am with you on all benefits from using a pedal. —Lorenzo "Surfer Joe" Valdambrini |
Joined: Jan 01, 2008 Posts: 2105 Livorno |
JONPAUL wrote:
If I had space in my car and in the venue, and loud volumes would always be allowed (minimum 7-) I would smash with a hammer ANY pedal. Just a nice guitar straight into an amp with volume at 7-. But as this is not always possible, pedals help. Lorenzo "Surfer Joe" Valdambrini |
Joined: Jan 01, 2008 Posts: 2105 Livorno |
By the way, in Italian "Topa" means "pussy" so I personally like the Topa-nga ! —Lorenzo "Surfer Joe" Valdambrini |
Joined: Oct 05, 2011 Posts: 110 Eastern Berlifornia |
Now i got the idea of dripping sound. |
Joined: Aug 29, 2009 Posts: 1555 Israel |
Lorenzo, that's an interesting take you have on this. What you said makes some sense, especially when YOU probably already own a tank or two...
Cheers Last edited: Aug 27, 2014 16:58:12 |
Joined: Jan 01, 2008 Posts: 2105 Livorno |
DreadInBabylon wrote:
I own the FRV, I own the Topanga, I own 5 tanks: 1 brand new brown, 2 1994 La Brea blonde (the best reissue ever), 1 1965 blackface, 1 1963 brown (original Hammond pan, not Gibbs/Accutronics). I listened CAREFULLY to the surfy bear in California, trying the one of Jonpaul. I love it, it sounds great. But I have to understand its usage since it is not a compact pedal. What I meant before. Your comment about the gigging is absolutely reasonable. The pedals for me are a spare and will always remain so. It would be probably interesting to see the surfy bear controller into a Twin Reverb combo. Now THAT would be a good usage of that controller. Probably using the surfy bear circuitry to replace what's into a combo amp would be the best usage. We should have to see what Pat Quilter thinks about integrating the surfy bear in the Steelair... —Lorenzo "Surfer Joe" Valdambrini |
Joined: Mar 30, 2011 Posts: 388 Copenhagen |
I haven't played the surfy bear yet, but if it sounds better than the FRV and the Topanga, here's what I think: IMO there is a place for the surfy bear, it's a very cheap alternative to the Fender unit and it's the best soundind alternative. If I ordered one I would put the PCB in a pedal enclosure box and carry the pan seperately in it's own leather bag. You can also carry just the PCB pedal and an RCA cable and plug the tank's pan in the pedal if the tank fails. For less than 100 euros I can have 99% of the tank sound, in a lighter and more portable package. (Not as light as a plain fx pedal but still, lighter than the tank) Compared to the 700+ euros for a new tank or the 450 euros for a used one, I believe the surfy bear is a great deal. —https://zakandthekrakens.bandcamp.com/ |