SG101 on the Web

Follow SurfGuitar101 on Twitter

Photo of the Day
Shoutbox

Emilien03: Wow! 2 weeks of instro madnnes in CA! Now ... back to reality! Cool
9 days ago

Brian: It was great seeing you Emilio!
9 days ago

bigtikidude: I agree, yer welcome anytime Emilio
8 days ago

bigtikidude: And yeah reality sucks
8 days ago

Robbit: The Fathoms are gigging through out the remainder of the year in the Boston/E.MA area Smile
4 days ago

HBkahuna: "Addicted to Surfing" by The Standells Tony Valentino now posted with Tony's permission. http://surfg...
4 days ago

TequilaWorm: TEQUILA WORMS new album out now!!
2 days ago

TequilaWorm: TheTequilaWo...
2 days ago

JONPAUL: Is it SG101 Convention 8 yet?
12 hours ago

bigtikidude: Dude, yer crazy, how bout we recover first, then North Sea surf fest, then Winter or spring surf fest , then instro summit, then Surfer Joe, then SG101 8
10 hours ago

Please login or register to shout.

IRC Status
  • Frus

Join them in the #ShallowEnd!

Need help getting started?

Current Contests

No contests at this time. Check out our past contests.

Donations

Help us meet our monthly goal:

100%

100%

Donate Now

Cake August Birthdays Cake
SG101 MP3 Comps
Top 101 Banner

SurfGuitar101 Forums » Recording Corner »

Permalink Reduce file size, not quality.

New Topic
Page 1 of 1

Hey guys,
Can anyone suggest a good way to reduce the file size of a recording slightly, without losing any of the sound quality?

I've got a recording that is 8.39 megs in size, and I need to reduce it to 8 megs or less in order to post it on ReverbNation.com.

Thanks guys,
Ken

Fin Doctors
Crashmatics

image

What format is it in now? If it is already in mp3, I'd just increase the compression one notch.

Site dude - S3 Agent #202
Need help with the site? SG101 FAQ - Send me a private message - Email me

"It starts... when it begins" -- Ralf Kilauea

DISCLAIMER: My avatar is a reflection of the relationship between myself and computers, and should not be construed as any kind of comment on my fellow SG101'ers.

depends on what file format you want or have to use. There are lossless compression algorithms that won't harm your audio but these are not as efficient and wide-spread as e.g. the MP3 format.

Greetings - the Fenderizer

they're coming to take me away, hahaaa ...

the only way to 'compress' it is to lower the quality or bit rate of the mp3. mp3 encodes and compresses sound or video files and the bit rate is the quality it compresses them at. so thus, lowering the bit rate will lower file size. if you lower it to 128 that is usually the threshold of good mp3 quality. anything lower sounds like a cellphone recording.

Knarle Tide

http://www.facebook.com/knarletide
http://www.reverbnation.com/knarletide

MrSpaghetti
the only way to 'compress' it is to lower the quality or bit rate of the mp3. mp3 encodes and compresses sound or video files and the bit rate is the quality it compresses them at. so thus, lowering the bit rate will lower file size. if you lower it to 128 that is usually the threshold of good mp3 quality. anything lower sounds like a cellphone recording.

I think 256 is my threshold. Especially with surf music. 128 is why mp3s have a bad name.

I'm personally okay with 192, but maybe the years of listening and playing rock n' roll have taken their toll on my hearing.

Sean
Double Crown Records
www.doublecrownrecords.com


Surf CD's / Vinyl / Fanzines / DVD's
15% OFF IN AUGUST WITH PROMO CODE: AUG15

If you want to keep it in mp3 format you could always encode with a variable bit-rate to keep the file size down. A 200-ish VBR mp3 will be indistinguishable from a 320 constant bit-rate mp3 to 95% of people and takes up much less space. I've seen tons of audiophiles fail ABX tests against VBR mp3s, so if they can't tell the difference then it's good enough for me Smile

Hot Summer Comes Again!
Let's Go Beach! Let's Go Beach!

SUBJECTIVELY:
I suppose most non-musician people, with non-audiofile or monitoring systems, in non-acoustically treated environments, would be hard pressed to feel a degradation in sound above 256kb/s vs the original. Many can, though, easily Confused (I can). 320cbr or 256(ish)vbr is the bare minimum for me.

OBJECTIVELY: Mp3 encoders add noise, to reduce perceivable aliasing that comes with resampling the data. So NEVER re-encode an already existing mp3 to a lower bitrate, it will sound horrible. ALWAYS sample the original WAV/AIFF/FLAC to the desired target.

Ariel


A single, double, triple, quadruple song

Page 1 of 1
Top